Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 16:20 UTC

lynndylanhurley / devise_token_auth

Token based authentication for Rails JSON APIs. Designed to work with jToker and ng-token-auth.

RubyWTFPL★ 3,569 stars⑂ 1,135 forkssince Jun 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#devise#rails#authentication#api#oauth#omniauth

lynndylanhurley/devise_token_auth holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated 83 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Lynn Dylan HurleyPersonal account
254 followers45 public repossince Nov 2010@graveflex

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsdevise_token_auth1.2.6-118240 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

39Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

31At Risk
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 83 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year6
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push83
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

50Moderate
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 53 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 240 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~249.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count53
latest_release_tagv1.2.6
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release240
mean_days_between_releases249.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

92Excellent
How it's scored
57.6/60Stars — 3,569 stars
25/25Forks — 1,135 forks
9.4/15Watchers — 51 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,135
stars3,569
watchers51
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

78Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (WTFPL)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

92Excellent
How it's scored
73.8/80Total downloads — 12,528,967 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdevise_token_auth
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads12,528,967
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.43

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
21.8/30PR acceptance — 439/605 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs439
open_issues185
closed_issues864
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs166
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.3/25Owner reach — 254 followers of lynndylanhurley
24.1/25Track record — 45 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers254
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginlynndylanhurley
public_repos45
account_age_days5,736
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 240 days ago
20/20Version history — 118 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdevise_token_auth
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish240

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevise, rails, authentication, api, oauth, omniauth
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

73Good
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsGemfile
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/136 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes30,324
source_files_sampled136
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3,569GitHub stars
100contributors
6commits, last 12 months
83days since last push
53releases
2bus factor
185open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsomniauth~> 2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsomniauth-rails_csrf_protection—Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid~> 7Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid~> 6Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid~> 5Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid>= 5Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid-locker~> 2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrails~> 7Gemfile
All dependencies 35

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsmongoid—direct
RubyGemsmongoid-locker—direct
RubyGemsomniauth—direct
RubyGemsomniauth-rails_csrf_protection—direct
RubyGemsrails—direct
RubyGemsappraisal—indirect
RubyGemsattr_encrypted—indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt—indirect
RubyGemsdatabase_cleaner—indirect
RubyGemsdevise—indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails—indirect
RubyGemsfaker—indirect
RubyGemsfigaro—indirect
RubyGemsfuzz_ball—indirect
RubyGemsgithub_changelog_generator—indirect
RubyGemsminitest—indirect
RubyGemsminitest-focus—indirect
RubyGemsminitest-rails—indirect
RubyGemsminitest-reporters—indirect
RubyGemsmocha—indirect
RubyGemsmysql2—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth-apple—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth-facebook—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth-github—indirect
RubyGemsomniauth-google-oauth2—indirect
RubyGemspg—indirect
RubyGemspry—indirect
RubyGemspry-byebug—indirect
RubyGemspry-remote—indirect
RubyGemsrack-cors—indirect
RubyGemsrails-controller-testing—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop—indirect
RubyGemssimplecov—indirect
RubyGemssqlite3—indirect
RubyGemsthor—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with lynndylanhurley/devise_token_auth. Read them side by side →

95doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeperDoorkeeper is an OAuth 2 provider for Ruby on Rails / Grape.Exceptional95ruby-oauth/oauth🔑 A Ruby wrapper for OAuth 1.0, and 1.0a protocols; clients & serversExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional97NangoHQ/nangoBuild product integrations with AI.Exceptional96better-auth/better-authThe most comprehensive authentication frameworkExceptional96praw-dev/prawPRAW, an acronym for "Python Reddit API Wrapper", is a python package that allows for simple access to Reddit's API.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.