Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 13:24 UTC

marcusquinn / aidevops

Vibe-Coding is easy. DevOps is hard. OpenCode & Git token-efficient AI agent automation for your app, business, and personal development. Opinionated tools, services, CLI & API stack for speed, security, and 24/7 results. Open-source first. SOTA everything. Try on your repos for money-making magic.

Shell · PythonMIT★ 381 stars⑂ 63 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

marcusquinn/aidevops holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (66/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Marcus QuinnPersonal account
209 followers26 public repossince Jan 2014@evergreenjersey @awardsapp @wpallstars

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmaidevops3.32.28536,1322,4810 days agoaidevopscliautomationcode-qualitygit-workflowmcpllmdspyprompt-optimizationai-agents

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume24,090 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year24,090
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year40

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.32.285
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.8/60Stars381 stars
14.9/25Forks63 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks63
stars381
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges15
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, github.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
60.8/80Monthly downloads36,132 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaidevops
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads36,132
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 79% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.787
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance12,483/13,829 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs12,483
open_issues9
closed_issues16,686
prs_merged_7d50
prs_decided_7d56
prs_merged_30d50
prs_decided_30d56
issue_closed_ratio0.999
closed_unmerged_prs1,346
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.7/25Owner reach209 followers of marcusquinn
22.4/25Track record26 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers209
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmarcusquinn
public_repos26
account_age_days4,600
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history2,481 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaidevops
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows60 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbiome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.aidevops.sh
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevops, devops-tools, agents, agents-md, ai, ai-agents, ai-assistant, ai-assistants, ai-assisted-development, ai-code-review, ai-coding, ai-devops, ai-dev-ops, ai-system-admin, claude, opencode, opencode-plugin, git-workflow, git-worktrees
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.aidevops.sh
docs_sitehttps://www.aidevops.sh
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages167
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitymoderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 167 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/commands/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/plugin-template/AGENTS.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, templates/home/AGENTS.md, templates/home/git/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history94 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.989
agent_instruction_files.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/commands/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/plugin-template/AGENTS.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, templates/home/AGENTS.md, templates/home/git/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes23,968
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbiome.json
11/11Static type checking.agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeShell with type-check config (.agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes4/1,228 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes204,232
source_files_sampled1,228
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

381GitHub stars
14contributors
24,090commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
9open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:aidevops@3.32.285; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 63 ⇿
0Stars
63Forks
78Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

013253850637563102025-122026-042026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 78
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 13:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests23 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmajv8.20.0.agents/package.json
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.5package.json
npmelysia1.4.29package.json
npmfile-type21.3.4package.json
npmhono4.13.0package.json
npmvite8.2.1package.json
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.5direct
npmajv8.20.0direct
npmelysia1.4.29direct
npmfile-type21.3.4direct
npmhono4.13.0direct
npmvite8.2.1direct
npm@ai-sdk/provider3.0.8indirect
npm@bufbuild/protobuf2.13.0indirect
npm@fontsource/courier-prime5.2.8indirect
npm@fontsource/dm-mono5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/dm-sans5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/fredoka5.2.10indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono5.2.7indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-sans5.2.8indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-serif5.2.7indirect
npm@fontsource/inter5.2.8indirect
npm@fontsource/mohave5.2.10indirect
npm@fontsource/playpen-sans5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/poppins5.2.7indirect
npm@fontsource/source-sans-35.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/source-serif-45.2.9indirect
npm@fontsource/tilt-neon5.2.10indirect
npm@fontsource/ubuntu5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ubuntu-mono5.2.8indirect
npm@fontsource/zilla-slab5.3.0indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-arm643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-x643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-arm3.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-arm643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-x643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-win32-x643.0.4indirect
npm@opencode-ai/plugin1.18.21indirect
npm@opencode-ai/sdk1.18.21indirect
npm@remotion/captions^4indirect
npm@remotion/cli^4indirect
npm@remotion/google-fonts^4indirect
npm@remotion/media^4indirect
npm@remotion/transitions^4indirect
npm@ryntab/wappalyzer-node^2.1.4indirect
npm@secretlint/secretlint-rule-preset-recommend11.7.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/bun1.3.14indirect
npm@types/bun^1.3.10indirect
npm@types/react19.2.18indirect
npm@types/react^19indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmeffect4.0.0-beta.83indirect
npmfast-check4.9.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.5indirect
npmfind-my-way-ts0.1.6indirect
npmini7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema0.4.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkubernetes-types1.30.0indirect
npmmsgpackr2.0.5indirect
npmmsgpackr-extract3.0.4indirect
npmmultipasta0.2.8indirect
npmnode-gyp-build-optional-packages5.2.2indirect
npmopencode-ai1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-arm64-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-baseline-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmplaywright1.55.1indirect
npmplaywright^1.58.2indirect
npmpure-rand8.4.2indirect
npmreact19.2.8indirect
npmreact^19indirect
npmreact-dom19.2.8indirect
npmreact-dom^19indirect
npmreact-icons5.6.0indirect
npmremotion^4indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmsecretlint11.7.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmtoml4.3.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript^5indirect
npmtypescript^5.9.3indirect
npmuuid14.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmzod4.1.8indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.5indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.1indirect
PyPIasyncer0.0.8indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdatasets4.4.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.0indirect
PyPIdiskcache5.6.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdspy3.1.0b1indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2025.10.0indirect
PyPIgepa0.0.22indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.21.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.15.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.2indirect
PyPIjson-repair0.61.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlitellm1.84.0indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.18indirect
PyPInumpy2.0.2indirect
PyPIopenai2.20.0indirect
PyPIoptuna4.6.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpyarrow24.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.5.9indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrich14.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.2indirect
PyPItiktoken0.13.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIxxhash3.7.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 167 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
diskcache5.6.3indirectmoderate2
datasets4.4.1indirectunknown15.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.