Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 05:53 UTC

marcusquinn / aidevops

Vibe-Coding is easy. DevOps is hard. OpenCode & Git token-efficient AI agent automation for your app, business, and personal development. Opinionated tools, services, CLI & API stack for speed, security, and 24/7 results. Open-source first. SOTA everything. The best AI harness for GitHub & teamwork.

Shell · PythonMIT★ 417 stars⑂ 70 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

marcusquinn/aidevops holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (63/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Marcus QuinnPersonal account
241 followers32 public repossince Jan 2014@wpallstars @evergreenjersey @awardsapp

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmaidevops3.39.4941,1792,7440 days agoaidevopscliautomationcode-qualitygit-workflowmcpllmprompt-optimizationai-agents

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 26,781 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year26,781
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.39.49
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.5/60Stars — 417 stars
15.3/25Forks — 70 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks70
stars417
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, github.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
61.5/80Monthly downloads — 41,179 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaidevops
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads41,179
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.777
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance — 14,881/16,458 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs14,881
open_issues13
closed_issues18,677
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d10
prs_merged_30d10
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.999
closed_unmerged_prs1,577
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.1/25Owner reach — 241 followers of marcusquinn
23.1/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers241
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmarcusquinn
public_repos32
account_age_days4,658
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 2,744 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaidevops
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 68 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.aidevops.sh
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevops, devops-tools, agents, agents-md, ai, ai-agents, ai-assistant, ai-assistants, ai-assisted-development, ai-code-review, ai-coding, ai-devops, ai-dev-ops, ai-system-admin, claude, opencode, opencode-plugin, git-workflow, git-worktrees
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.aidevops.sh
docs_sitehttps://www.aidevops.sh
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages167
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 167 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/commands/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/plugin-template/AGENTS.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 89 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.927
agent_instruction_files.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/commands/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/.agents/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/agent-source-repo/AGENTS.md, .agents/templates/plugin-template/AGENTS.md, .github/instructions/codacy.instructions.md, AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes23,997
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — .agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Shell with type-check config (.agents/scripts/higgsfield/remotion/tsconfig.json, .agents/scripts/simplex-bot/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 10/1,792 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes204,232
source_files_sampled1,792
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

417GitHub stars
16contributors
26,781commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
13open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:aidevops@3.39.49; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 70 ⇿
0Stars
70Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

013253850637570102025-122026-052026-10
Major 0Minor 2Patch 90
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 05:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmajv8.20.0.agents/package.json
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.1.2package.json
npmelysia1.4.30package.json
npmfile-type21.3.4package.json
npmhono4.13.13package.json
npmvite8.3.3package.json
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.1.2direct
npmajv8.20.0direct
npmelysia1.4.30direct
npmfile-type21.3.4direct
npmhono4.13.13direct
npmvite8.3.3direct
npm@ai-sdk/provider3.0.8indirect
npm@bufbuild/protobuf2.13.0indirect
npm@fontsource/courier-prime5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/dm-mono5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/dm-sans5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/fredoka5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-sans5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-serif5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/inter5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/mohave5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/playpen-sans5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/poppins5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/source-sans-35.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/source-serif-45.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/tilt-neon5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ubuntu5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/ubuntu-mono5.3.0indirect
npm@fontsource/zilla-slab5.3.0indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-arm643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-x643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-arm3.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-arm643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-linux-x643.0.4indirect
npm@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-win32-x643.0.4indirect
npm@opencode-ai/plugin1.18.33indirect
npm@opencode-ai/sdk1.18.33indirect
npm@remotion/captions^4indirect
npm@remotion/cli^4indirect
npm@remotion/google-fonts^4indirect
npm@remotion/media^4indirect
npm@remotion/transitions^4indirect
npm@ryntab/wappalyzer-node^2.1.4indirect
npm@secretlint/secretlint-rule-preset-recommend13.0.7indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/bun1.4.2indirect
npm@types/bun^1.3.10indirect
npm@types/react19.3.0indirect
npm@types/react^19indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.7indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmeffect4.0.0-beta.83indirect
npmfast-check4.9.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.8indirect
npmfind-my-way-ts0.1.6indirect
npmini7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema0.4.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkubernetes-types1.30.0indirect
npmmsgpackr2.0.5indirect
npmmsgpackr-extract3.0.4indirect
npmmultipasta0.2.8indirect
npmnode-gyp-build-optional-packages5.2.2indirect
npmopencode-ai1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-darwin-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-arm64-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-baseline-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-linux-x64-musl1.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-arm641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-x641.18.11indirect
npmopencode-windows-x64-baseline1.18.11indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmplaywright1.55.1indirect
npmplaywright^1.58.2indirect
npmpure-rand8.4.2indirect
npmreact19.3.0indirect
npmreact^19indirect
npmreact-dom19.3.0indirect
npmreact-dom^19indirect
npmreact-icons5.7.0indirect
npmremotion^4indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmsecretlint13.0.7indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmtoml4.3.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript^5indirect
npmtypescript^5.9.3indirect
npmuuid14.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmzod4.1.8indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.4indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.5indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIasyncer0.0.8indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdatasets5.0.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.0indirect
PyPIdiskcache5.6.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIgepa0.0.22indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.21.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.15.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.2indirect
PyPIjson-repair0.61.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlitellm1.93.2indirect
PyPImako1.4.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImcp1.30.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.18indirect
PyPInumpy2.0.2indirect
PyPIopenai2.20.0indirect
PyPIoptuna4.6.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpyarrow24.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.5.9indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrich14.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.2indirect
PyPItiktoken0.13.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIxxhash3.7.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.25.1indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 167 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
diskcache5.6.3indirectmoderate2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.