Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 07:14 UTC

markolofsen / django-cfg

🚀 Django-CFG: Type-Safe Django Configuration Framework with AI-Ready Infrastructure

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 24 stars⑂ 1 forksince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork serviceChat bothow this is determined

markolofsen/django-cfg holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (40/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MarqPersonal account
48 followers66 public repossince Aug 2015Cmdop

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 487 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year487
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year51
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 311 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0.28
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release311
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.1/60Stars — 24 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars24
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.1/80Monthly downloads — 6,822 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdjango-cfg
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads6,822
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.2/25Owner reach — 48 followers of markolofsen
25/25Track record — 66 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers48
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmarkolofsen
public_repos66
account_age_days4,097
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 437 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-cfg
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — django_cfg/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://djangocfg.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadmin, ai, django, django-rest-framework, django-unfold, llm, pydantic
has_wikino
homepagehttps://djangocfg.com
docs_sitehttps://djangocfg.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
manifestsdjango_cfg/pyproject.toml, django_cfg/requirements.txt
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages132
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-cfg@2.3.327 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 132 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — solution/projects/django/CLAUDE.md, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.1/40Legible commit history — 4 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.04
agent_instruction_filessolution/projects/django/CLAUDE.md, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes623
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, solution/docker/Makefile, solution/projects/django/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — django_cfg/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — django_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, solution/docker/Makefile, solution/projects/django/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdjango_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (django_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,470 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes122,086
source_files_sampled1,470
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsrecipes
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filessolution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot, network-service

Key facts

24GitHub stars
1contributors
487commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 70
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.11.0,<3.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-yaml>=1.6.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=6.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.2.0,<9.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary>=2.1.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=14.0.0,<15.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorlog>=6.9.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.3.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2,<0.11.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=12.2.0,<13.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcoolname>=2.2.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItzlocal>=5.3.1,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=7.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIfaker>=40.0.0,<41.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.2.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdj-database-url>=3.0.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpgvector>=0.4.2,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIwhitenoise>=6.8.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-cors-headers>=4.7.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-extensions>=4.1.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-constance>=4.3.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-unfold>=0.73.1django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-json-widget>=2.0.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-import-export>=4.3.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-admin-rangefilter>=0.13.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-axes>=8.0.0,<9.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-tailwind>=4.2.0,<5.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-simple-history>=3.7.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework>=3.16.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-simplejwt>=5.5.1,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-nested-routers>=0.95.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-filter>=25.0,<26.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-ratelimit>=4.1.0,<5.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular>=0.28.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular-sidecar>=2025.8.0,<2026.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIadrf>=0.1.11,<0.2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-redis>=6.0.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis>=6.4.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIhiredis>=2.0.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyotp>=2.9.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode>=8.2,<9.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=46.0.7django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIemail-validator>=2.3.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyTelegramBotAPI>=4.28.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpywebpush>=2.0.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.33.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.13.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=6.1.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPImistune>=3.2.1,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.12.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=2.45.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity>=9.1.2,<10.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjson-repair>=0.30,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.13.4,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiometer>=1.0.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiobreaker>=1.2.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.6,<4.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIPygments>=2.20.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjson-toon>=1.0.2,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-json-logger>=3.3.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopy>=2.4.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIua-parser>=1.0.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPImypy>=1.18.2,<2.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-stubs>=5.2.9,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-stubs>=3.16.8,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIsetuptools>=75.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-cfg@2.3.327 pulls in 132 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.