Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:48 UTC

markolofsen / django-cfg

🚀 Django-CFG: Type-Safe Django Configuration Framework with AI-Ready Infrastructure

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 24 stars⑂ 1 forksince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork serviceChat bothow this is determined
#admin#ai#django#django-rest-framework#django-unfold#llm#pydantic

markolofsen/django-cfg holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (35/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MarqPersonal account
46 followers65 public repossince Aug 2015Cmdop

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdjango-cfg2.2.1548,1063992 days agoai-agentscentrifugoconfigurationdjangodjango-environdjango-settingsenterprise-djangoide-autocompletemodern-djangonextjs-adminpydanticpydantic-settingsreact-adminreal-timesettingsstartup-validationtype-safe-configtype-safetytypescript-generationwebsocket

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 460 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year460
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year43

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 252 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0.28
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release252
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk
How it's scored
22.1/60Stars — 24 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars24
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
52.1/80Monthly downloads — 8,106 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdjango-cfg
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads8,106
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

100Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12/25Owner reach — 46 followers of markolofsen
25/25Track record — 65 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers46
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmarkolofsen
public_repos65
account_age_days4,038
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 399 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-cfg
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — django_cfg/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://djangocfg.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsadmin, ai, django, django-rest-framework, django-unfold, llm, pydantic
has_wikino
homepagehttps://djangocfg.com
docs_sitehttps://djangocfg.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
manifestsdjango_cfg/pyproject.toml, django_cfg/requirements.txt
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno

Dependency advisories

77Good
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
8.8/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: skia-python 138.0.0 (high 8.1)
33.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 155 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages142
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the pypi:django-cfg@2.2.154 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 142 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

81Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — solution/projects/django/CLAUDE.md, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://djangocfg.com/llms.txt)
20.8/40Legible commit history — 39 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://djangocfg.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.39
agent_instruction_filessolution/projects/django/CLAUDE.md, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes623

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

87Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, solution/docker/Makefile, solution/projects/django/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — django_cfg/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort]), eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — django_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, solution/docker/Makefile, solution/projects/django/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/Makefile, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdjango_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (django_cfg/py.typed, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,532 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes122,086
source_files_sampled1,532
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

80Excellent
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/openapi.json
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsrecipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessolution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/.tmp/generated/typescript-admin-0/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_crypto/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_profiles/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/_trading/openapi.json, solution/projects/frontend/apps/admin/app/_lib/api/generated/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot, network-service

Key facts

24GitHub stars
1contributors
460commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (2026/08/22 14:45:02 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 73
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.11.0,<3.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-yaml>=1.6.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=6.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.2.0,<9.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary>=2.1.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=14.0.0,<15.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorlog>=6.9.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools>=5.3.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2,<0.11.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=12.2.0,<13.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpictex>=2.1.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcoolname>=2.2.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItzlocal>=5.3.1,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=7.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIfaker>=40.0.0,<41.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIngrok>=1.5.1django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.2.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdj-database-url>=3.0.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpgvector>=0.4.2,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIwhitenoise>=6.8.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-cors-headers>=4.7.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-extensions>=4.1.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-constance>=4.3.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-unfold>=0.73.1django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-json-widget>=2.0.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-import-export>=4.3.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-admin-rangefilter>=0.13.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-axes>=8.0.0,<9.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-tailwind>=4.2.0,<5.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-simple-history>=3.7.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcent>=5.0.0,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework>=3.16.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-simplejwt>=5.5.1,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-nested-routers>=0.95.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-filter>=25.0,<26.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-ratelimit>=4.1.0,<5.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular>=0.28.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdrf-spectacular-sidecar>=2025.8.0,<2026.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIadrf>=0.1.11,<0.2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-redis>=6.0.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis>=6.4.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIhiredis>=2.0.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyotp>=2.9.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode>=8.2,<9.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=46.0.7django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIemail-validator>=2.3.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyTelegramBotAPI>=4.28.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpywebpush>=2.0.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.33.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.13.0,<5.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=6.1.0,<7.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPImistune>=3.2.1,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.12.0,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=2.45.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity>=9.1.2,<10.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjson-repair>=0.30,<1.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.13.4,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiometer>=1.0.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiobreaker>=1.2.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.6,<4.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIPygments>=2.20.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIjson-toon>=1.0.2,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-json-logger>=3.3.0,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopy>=2.4.0,<3.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIua-parser>=1.0.0,<2.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPImypy>=1.18.2,<2.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-stubs>=5.2.9,<6.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIdjangorestframework-stubs>=3.16.8,<4.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
PyPIsetuptools>=75.0.0django_cfg/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:django-cfg@2.2.154 pulls in 142 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
skia-python138.0.0indirecthigh1144.0.post1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with markolofsen/django-cfg. Read them side by side →

99langchain-ai/langgraphBuild resilient agents.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99google/adk-pythonAn open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional98mem0ai/mem0Universal memory layer for AI AgentsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.