Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 05:49 UTC

mbailey / voicemode

Natural voice conversations with Claude Code

PythonMIT★ 1,366 stars⑂ 194 forkssince Jun 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined
#asr#claudecode#kokoro#livekit#mcp#mcp-server#tts#voice#whisper#voicemode#anthropic#claude

mbailey/voicemode holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mike BaileyPersonal account
113 followers63 public repossince Apr 2008

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIvoice-mode8.12.07,53313456 days agoailivekitllmmcpspeechsttttsvoice
PyPIvoice-mode-install8.12.0-4656 days agoinstallermcpsetupvoicevoicemode

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,349 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,349
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year43

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv8.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

74Good
How it's scored
50.9/60Stars — 1,366 stars
19/25Forks — 194 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks194
stars1,366
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
51.7/80Monthly downloads — 7,533 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesvoice-mode, voice-mode-install
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads7,533
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

27At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.801

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
33.9/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
21/30PR acceptance — 266/380 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs266
open_issues25
closed_issues105
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.808
closed_unmerged_prs114
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach — 113 followers of mbailey
25/25Track record — 63 public repos, account ~18 yr old
Inputs used
followers113
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmbailey
public_repos63
account_age_days6,740
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history — 134 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesvoice-mode, voice-mode-install
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://voicemode.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsasr, claudecode, kokoro, livekit, mcp, mcp-server, tts, voice, whisper, voicemode, anthropic, claude
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://voicemode.dev
docs_sitehttps://voicemode.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:voice-mode@8.12.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 90 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 89 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.927
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,991

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 39 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.39
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 3/278 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes227,282
source_files_sampled278
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,366GitHub stars
15contributors
1,349commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
25open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'voice-mode-install' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 194 ⇿
0Stars
194Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020019362025-062026-012026-09
Major 5Minor 40Patch 55

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 05:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=8.0.0installer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.0installer/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=5.9.0installer/pyproject.toml
PyPIuv>=0.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastmcp>=3.2.0,<4pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIsounddevice—pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy—pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=2pyproject.toml
PyPIpydub—pyproject.toml
PyPIaudioop-lts—pyproject.toml
PyPIsimpleaudio—pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx—pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp—pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=5.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwebrtcvad-wheels>=2.0.14pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIkeyring>=25.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 156

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.1direct
PyPIaudioop-lts0.2.2direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIfastmcp3.4.3direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIkeyring25.7.0direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.3.3direct
PyPIopenai2.44.0direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpydub0.25.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIscipy1.15.3direct
PyPIscipy1.16.2direct
PyPIsimpleaudio1.0.4direct
PyPIsounddevice0.5.5direct
PyPIuv0.11.26direct
PyPIwebrtcvad-wheels2.0.14direct
PyPIaiofile3.9.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.10.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.7.2indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs5.9indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.1indirect
PyPIcaio0.9.25indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.6indirect
PyPIcryptography48.0.1indirect
PyPIcsscompressor0.9.5indirect
PyPIcyclopts4.11.2indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.1indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim3.4.3indirect
PyPIflask3.1.3indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.7.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.50indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.0.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhtmlmin20.1.13indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.1indirect
PyPIid1.5.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.3.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.10.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.6.8indirect
PyPIjsmin3.0.1indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.3.4indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.9indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImcp1.27.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin1.5.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-minify-plugin0.8.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.6.4indirect
PyPInh30.3.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.5.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.39.1indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathable0.4.4indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.3.2indirect
PyPIproperdocs1.6.7indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.4indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic2.11.9indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.33.2indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.10.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.9.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.1.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst1.3.1indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.1indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.4.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.0.2indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.1indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.3.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.35.0indirect
PyPIvoice-mode-install8.10.2indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIyarl1.20.1indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:voice-mode@8.12.0 pulls in 90 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mbailey/voicemode. Read them side by side →

96diegosouzapw/OmniRouteNever stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 352 providers (150+ free), 1200+ models Kimi, Claude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A, Desktop/PWA. Built by 550+ contributorsExceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional96yamadashy/repomix📦 Repomix is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI-friendly file. Perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Gemini, Gemma, Llama, Grok, and more.Exceptional98strands-agents/toolsA set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional97strands-agents/harness-sdkBuild an agent harness and control it end-to-end. Open-source SDK for production AI agents in Python & TypeScript - any model, any cloud.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.