Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 09:44 UTC

mbari-org / aidata

Extract, transform, load/download and augment images and annotations for object detection, clustering or classification workflows

PythonNo license detected★ 7 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Mar 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

mbari-org/aidata holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

63 followers138 public repossince Apr 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPImbari-aidata1.79.5-748 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 145 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year145
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.79.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars7
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.98
How it's scored
37.7/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 40/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs40
open_issues4
closed_issues35
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.897
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13/25Owner reach — 63 followers of mbari-org
25/25Track record — 138 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers63
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmbari-org
public_repos138
account_age_days3,061

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 74 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmbari-aidata
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.mbari.org/internal/ai/data
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, database, machine-learning, etl
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.mbari.org/internal/ai/data
docs_sitehttps://docs.mbari.org/internal/ai/data
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 48 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.9
How it's scored
6.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: torch 2.2.0 (critical 9.8), pyarrow 15.0.2 (high 7.0)
6.8/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: pillow 11.3.0 (critical 9.1)
24.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 681 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories62
affected_packages3
assessed_packages85
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the pypi:mbari-aidata@1.79.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 85 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.6/40Legible commit history — 55 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.556
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,178
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 17 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.17
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes39,330
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
4contributors
145commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
4open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'mbari-aidata' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
48Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412025-102026-032026-08
Major 0Minor 19Patch 29
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 09:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities48 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIredis5.0.7pyproject.toml
PyPItator1.2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIephem>=4.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPImoviepy>=2.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIopencv-contrib-python4.11.0.86pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz>=2024.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpiexif>=1.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.7pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm4.67.1pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpascal-voc-writer>=0.1.4pyproject.toml
PyPIalbumentations>=1.4.15pyproject.toml
PyPIalbucore>=0.0.16pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas^2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyarrow^15.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.24,<2pyproject.toml
PyPItorch2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItorchvision0.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPItransformers>=4.42.4,<6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpytest^9.1.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 90

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 70 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIalbucore0.0.24direct
PyPIalbumentations2.0.8direct
PyPIclick8.3.1direct
PyPIephem4.2direct
PyPImoviepy2.2.1direct
PyPInumpy1.26.4direct
PyPIopencv-contrib-python4.11.0.86direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpascal-voc-writer0.1.4direct
PyPIpiexif1.1.3direct
PyPIpyarrow15.0.2direct
PyPIpytest9.1.1direct
PyPIpytz2025.2direct
PyPIredis5.0.7direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPItator1.2.3direct
PyPItorch2.2.0direct
PyPItorchvision0.17.0direct
PyPItqdm4.67.1direct
PyPItransformers5.0.0rc3direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIfsspec2025.10.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.4.3indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.11.0indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimageio2.37.2indirect
PyPIimageio-ffmpeg0.6.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.1.3.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.1.105indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.1.105indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.1.105indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu128.9.2.26indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.0.2.54indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.2.106indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.4.5.107indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.1.0.106indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.19.3indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.9.86indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.1.105indirect
PyPIopencv-python-headless4.11.0.86indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpillow11.3.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIproglog0.1.12indirect
PyPIprogressbar24.5.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.1.3indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-utils3.9.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIregex2025.11.3indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.7.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsimsimd6.5.3indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIstringzilla4.2.3indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItriton2.2.0indirect
PyPItyper0.24.1indirect
PyPItyper-slim0.24.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
Dependency advisories 3

Installing pypi:mbari-aidata@1.79.5 pulls in 85 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
torch2.2.0directcritical232.13.0
pillow11.3.0indirectcritical3612.3.0
pyarrow15.0.2directhigh323.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.