Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:24 UTC

mistralai / mistral-vibe

Minimal CLI coding agent by Mistral

PythonApache-2.0★ 4,878 stars⑂ 675 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverNetwork serviceTerminal interfacehow this is determined

mistralai/mistral-vibe holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (58/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mistral AIOrganization · verified domain

8,953 followers28 public repossince May 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	mistral-vibe	2.24.5	11,782,207	82	0 days ago	ai cli coding-assistant developer-tools llm mistral

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

89Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36	Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18	Commit volume — 83 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	83
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	37

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 83 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~3.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	83
latest_release_tag	v2.24.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	3.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

86Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent

How it's scored

59.8/60	Stars — 4,878 stars
23.6/25	Forks — 675 forks
7.7/15	Watchers — 25 watchers

Inputs used

forks	675
stars	4,878
watchers	25
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 11,782,207 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	mistral-vibe
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	11,782,207
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

54Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	10
top_contributor_share	0.44

Issue & PR responsiveness

56Moderate

How it's scored

31.7/42	Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
10.4/30	PR acceptance — 84/242 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	84
open_issues	109
closed_issues	335
prs_merged_7d	2
prs_decided_7d	4
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	20
issue_closed_ratio	0.755
closed_unmerged_prs	158
first_time_authors_30d	10
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	12

Ownership & stewardship

92Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 8,953 followers of mistralai
17.3/25	Track record — 28 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	8,953
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	mistralai
public_repos	28
account_age_days	1,213

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 82 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	mistral-vibe
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe#readme
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe#readme
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	5.9

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	142
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 142 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 70 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.833
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,354

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

53Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 84
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 15/1,124 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	224,507
source_files_sampled	1,124
oversized_source_files	15

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

4,878GitHub stars

10contributors

83commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

83releases

2bus factor

109open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:mistral-vibe@2.24.5; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 675 ⇿

0Stars

675Forks

82Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 26Patch 54

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10

5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 20:24 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
1	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
8	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 99

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	agent-client-protocol	`==0.11.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	annotated-types	`==0.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	anyio	`==4.14.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	attrs	`==26.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`==4.14.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cachetools	`==7.0.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	certifi	`==2026.7.22`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cffi	`==2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`==3.4.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click	`==8.3.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	colorama	`==0.4.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`==50.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	eval-type-backport	`==0.3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	gitdb	`==4.0.12`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	gitpython	`==3.1.58`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	giturlparse	`==0.15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	google-auth	`==2.49.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`==1.74.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	h11	`==0.16.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpcore	`==1.0.9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`==0.28.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx-sse	`==0.4.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	humanize	`==4.16.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	idna	`==3.18`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`==8.7.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`==3.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jaraco-context	`==6.1.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`==4.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jeepney	`==0.9.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonpatch	`==1.33`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonpath-python	`==1.1.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonpointer	`==3.1.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema	`==4.26.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`==2025.9.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	keyring	`==25.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`==2.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`==4.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	markdownify	`==1.2.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mcp	`==1.28.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`==0.5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mdurl	`==0.1.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mistralai	`==2.6.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	more-itertools	`==11.0.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`==1.39.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	`==1.39.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	`==1.39.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`==1.39.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`==1.39.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`==0.60b1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`==26.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pexpect	`==4.9.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	platformdirs	`==4.9.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	protobuf	`==6.33.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ptyprocess	`==0.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyasn1	`==0.6.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`==0.4.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pycparser	`==3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`==2.13.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-core	`==2.46.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`==2.14.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pygments	`==2.20.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyjwt	`==2.13.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyperclip	`==1.11.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`==2.9.0.post0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dotenv	`==1.2.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-multipart	`==0.0.32`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pywin32	`==311`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`==0.2.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pywinpty	`==3.0.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`==6.0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	referencing	`==0.37.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`==2.34.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rfc8785	`==0.1.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`==15.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rpds-py	`==0.30.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	secretstorage	`==3.5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sentry-sdk	`==2.64.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	setproctitle	`==1.3.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	six	`==1.17.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	smmap	`==5.0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sounddevice	`==0.5.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	soupsieve	`==2.8.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sse-starlette	`==3.4.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	starlette	`==1.3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	textual	`==8.2.8`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	textual-speedups	`==0.2.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tomli-w	`==1.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tree-sitter	`==0.26.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tree-sitter-bash	`==0.25.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	truststore	`==0.10.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`==4.15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-inspection	`==0.4.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uc-micro-py	`==2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	urllib3	`==2.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`==0.46.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	watchfiles	`==1.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	websockets	`==16.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	zipp	`==3.23.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	zstandard	`==0.25.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 99 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	agent-client-protocol	`0.11.0`	direct
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	direct
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.1`	direct
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	direct
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.14.3`	direct
PyPI	cachetools	`7.0.6`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	direct
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.3.3`	direct
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	direct
PyPI	eval-type-backport	`0.3.1`	direct
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	direct
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.58`	direct
PyPI	giturlparse	`0.15.0`	direct
PyPI	google-auth	`2.49.2`	direct
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.74.0`	direct
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	direct
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	direct
PyPI	humanize	`4.16.0`	direct
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	direct
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	direct
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	direct
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	direct
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.4.0`	direct
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	direct
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.33`	direct
PyPI	jsonpath-python	`1.1.5`	direct
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	direct
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	direct
PyPI	linkify-it-py	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	direct
PyPI	markdownify	`1.2.3`	direct
PyPI	mcp	`1.28.1`	direct
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.5.0`	direct
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	direct
PyPI	mistralai	`2.6.0`	direct
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.0.2`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.39.1`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common	`1.39.1`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http	`1.39.1`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`1.39.1`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.39.1`	direct
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.60b1`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	direct
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	direct
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.6`	direct
PyPI	protobuf	`6.33.6`	direct
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	direct
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.4`	direct
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	direct
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	direct
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	direct
PyPI	pyperclip	`1.11.0`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	direct
PyPI	pywin32	`311`	direct
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	direct
PyPI	pywinpty	`3.0.5`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	rfc8785	`0.1.4`	direct
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	direct
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	direct
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	direct
PyPI	sentry-sdk	`2.64.0`	direct
PyPI	setproctitle	`1.3.7`	direct
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	direct
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	direct
PyPI	sounddevice	`0.5.5`	direct
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	direct
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.1`	direct
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	direct
PyPI	textual	`8.2.8`	direct
PyPI	textual-speedups	`0.2.1`	direct
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	direct
PyPI	tree-sitter	`0.26.0`	direct
PyPI	tree-sitter-bash	`0.25.1`	direct
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	direct
PyPI	uc-micro-py	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.46.0`	direct
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	direct
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	direct
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.1`	direct
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	direct
PyPI	altgraph	`0.17.5`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	debugpy	`1.8.21`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.0`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	macholib	`1.16.4`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mistral-vibe	`2.24.5`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.5`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pefile	`2024.8.26`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit-uv	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller	`6.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller-hooks-contrib	`2026.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstrument	`5.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.409`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-textual-snapshot	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`44.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	respx	`0.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.18`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	syrupy	`4.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	typos	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	uv	`0.12.3`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	vulture	`2.16`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 142 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records