Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 01:49 UTC

mkb79 / Audible

A(Sync) Interface for internal Audible API written in pure Python.

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 416 stars⑂ 40 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#audible-api#audible#async-functions#encrypted-store#python

mkb79/Audible holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (93/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (58/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mkb79Personal account
32 followers16 public repossince Jun 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIaudible0.12.020,1743557 days agoapiaudibleasync

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
16.8/18Commit volume — 73 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year73
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 57 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~175.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv0.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release57
mean_days_between_releases175.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

61Moderate
How it's scored
42.5/60Stars — 416 stars
13.3/25Forks — 40 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks40
stars416
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
57.4/80Monthly downloads — 20,174 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaudible
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads20,174
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.953

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good
How it's scored
40.4/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
20.9/30PR acceptance — 545/782 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs545
open_issues3
closed_issues77
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.963
closed_unmerged_prs237
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.9/25Owner reach — 32 followers of mkb79
21/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers32
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmkb79
public_repos16
account_age_days3,014
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
20/20Version history — 35 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaudible
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://audible.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaudible-api, audible, async-functions, encrypted-store, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://audible.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://audible.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

66Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:audible@0.12.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

93Exceptional · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 63 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.984
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes17,543

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile, noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/audible/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 36 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, noxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/audible/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.36

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/audible/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/65 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes36,688
source_files_sampled65
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

416GitHub stars
17contributors
73commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
38releases
1bus factor
3open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 40 ⇿
0Stars
40Forks
37Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030404022019-062023-012026-08
Major 0Minor 10Patch 21

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 01:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIPillow(>=12.3.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4(>=4.14.3)pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx(>=0.27.2,<0.29)pyproject.toml
PyPIpbkdf2(>=1.3)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyaes(>=1.6.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIrsa(>=4.9.1)pyproject.toml
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 136 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIpbkdf21.3direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIpyaes1.6.1direct
PyPIrsa4.9.1direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIaudible0.12.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIboolean-py5.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.11.0indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.16.5indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib11.11.0indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdependency-groups1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser-fork0.0.16indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.0indirect
PyPIgit-cliff2.13.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhumanize4.16.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlicense-expression30.4.4indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInox2026.7.11indirect
PyPInox-uv0.8.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.17.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpip26.2.1indirect
PyPIpip-api0.0.34indirect
PyPIpip-audit2.10.1indirect
PyPIpip-requirements-parser32.0.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit-hooks6.0.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpy-serializable2.1.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydoclint0.9.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.0indirect
PyPIpython-rapidjson1.23indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.22indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.13.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-httpdomain2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypeguard4.5.2indirect
PyPItypes-beautifulsoup44.12.0.20250516indirect
PyPItypes-docutils0.22.3.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-html5lib1.1.11.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pygments2.20.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-webencodings0.5.0.20260408indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIujson5.13.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.51.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1.1indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIxdoctest1.3.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:audible@0.12.0 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mkb79/Audible. Read them side by side →

98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional99quantumlib/CirqPython framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional98python-telegram-bot/python-telegram-botWe have made you a wrapper you can't refuseExceptional98Skyvern-AI/skyvernAutomate browser based workflows with AIExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.