Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.17.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 07:04 UTC
n0-computer / noq
noq, a QUIC implementation in Rust
n0-computer/noq holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
92
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
number zeroOrganization
1,023 followers120 public repossince Mar 2022
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | noq | 1.1.0 | 179,483 | 8 | 0 days ago | quicasynchronousnetwork-programming |
| crates.io | perf | 0.0.2 | 158 | 3 | 2459 days ago | — |
| crates.io | benchpoints to another repo — not scored | 1.1.0 | 47 | 2 | 1917 days ago | — |
| crates.io | noq-udp | 1.1.0 | 179,996 | 7 | 0 days ago | quicasynchronousnetwork-programming |
| crates.io | noq-proto | 1.1.0 | 179,403 | 7 | 0 days ago | quicasynchronousnetwork-programming |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
100
Development activity
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 36/36 | Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 1,007 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 1,007 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 52 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 5 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 0 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~24.1 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 5 |
| latest_release_tag | noq-v1.1.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 0 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 24.1 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
75
Popularity & adoption
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 41.3/60 | Stars — 354 stars |
| 13.8/25 | Forks — 46 forks |
| 4.7/15 | Watchers — 8 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 46 |
| stars | 354 |
| watchers | 8 |
| growth_state | organic |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
Community health
77Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
96Exceptional
How it's scored
| 76.4/80 | Monthly downloads — 538,882 downloads/month across crates |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | noq, noq-udp, noq-proto |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | crates |
| total_downloads | 1,718,384 |
| monthly_downloads | 538,882 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | perf |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
79
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 15/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 100 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 70 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 100 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.335 |
How it's scored
| 23.5/42 | Issue resolution — 56% of issues closed |
| 25.5/30 | PR acceptance — 497/584 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 10.5/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 497 |
| open_issues | 75 |
| closed_issues | 95 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.559 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 87 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 21.6/25 | Owner reach — 1,023 followers of n0-computer |
| 21.8/25 | Track record — 120 public repos, account ~4 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 1,023 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | n0-computer |
| public_repos | 120 |
| account_age_days | 1,598 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on crates |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 8 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | noq, perf, noq-udp, noq-proto |
| ecosystems | crates |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 0 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
73
Engineering practices
68Good
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 10 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/noq |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | https://docs.rs/noq |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
65
Security posture
65Good
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 5.2/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 70 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 5/5 | Fuzzing — project is fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 5.2/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 6.5 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
51
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
53Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Rust (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
95Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed) |
| 50.2/55 | Manageable file sizes — 10/114 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Rust |
| largest_source_bytes | 327,434 |
| source_files_sampled | 114 |
| oversized_source_files | 10 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
354GitHub stars
100contributors
1,007commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
5releases
2bus factor
75open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- crates package 'bench' points at a different repository (https://github.com/AlexanderThaller/bench-rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
- deps.dev does not index crates:noq@1.1.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
More detail
Star and fork history 354 ★ / 0 ⇿
354Stars
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Each point covers 2 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 7 | Code-Review | Found 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 70 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 10 | Fuzzing | project is fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7 | Vulnerabilities | 3 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 73
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | anyhow | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | clap | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hdrhistogram | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | noq | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rcgen | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing-subscriber | — | bench/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aes-gcm | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | arbitrary | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aws-lc-rs | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | criterion | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | derive_more | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | enum-assoc | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | fastbloom | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | identity-hash | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | lru-slab | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | qlog | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rand_pcg | 0.10 | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | ring | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustc-hash | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls-platform-verifier | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | slab | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sorted-index-buffer | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tinyvec | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing | — | noq-proto/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | libc | 0.2.175 | noq-udp/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | — | noq-udp/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing | — | noq-udp/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-io | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | derive_more | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures-io | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustc-hash | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | pin-project-lite | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | proto | 1.1.0 | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | smol | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | udp | 1.1.0 | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-global-executor | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-fs | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-executor | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aws-lc-fips-sys | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | aws-lc-sys | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | gcc | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | http | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | lazy_static | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sharded-slab | — | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-stream | 0.1.15 | noq/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | anyhow | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | clap | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | console-subscriber | 0.5.0 | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hdrhistogram | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | noq | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | noq-proto | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rcgen | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde_json | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | socket2 | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tracing-subscriber | — | perf/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.17.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.