Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 05:43 UTC

n24q02m / mcp-core

Shared foundation for building MCP servers -- Streamable HTTP transport, OAuth 2.1, browser-based credential setup, and a shared embedding daemon.

Python · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

n24q02m/mcp-core holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nguyen Quang MinhPersonal account
40 followers54 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 840 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year840
human_commit_share0.46
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.25.11
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases0.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
57.5/80Monthly downloads — 20,668 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@n24q02m/mcp-core, n24q02m-mcp-core, mcp-embedding-daemon
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads20,668
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.998
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
18.2/30PR acceptance — 546/899 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs546
open_issues1
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d23
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs353
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.6/25Owner reach — 40 followers of n24q02m
19.4/25Track record — 54 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers40
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginn24q02m
public_repos54
account_age_days1,232
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 20 days ago
20/20Version history — 158 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@n24q02m/mcp-core, n24q02m-mcp-core, mcp-embedding-daemon
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, packages/core-py/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/mcp-core/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, mcp, model-context-protocol, oauth21, python, streamable-http, typescript, open-source
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/mcp-core/
docs_sitehttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/mcp-core/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages99
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@n24q02m/mcp-core@1.25.11 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 99 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://mcp.n24q02m.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 46 of 46 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,903
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — .mise.toml, Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, packages/core-py/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), ruff.toml
11/11Static type checking — packages/core-ts/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 54 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files.mise.toml, Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/core-ts/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.54
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/core-ts/tsconfig.json)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 4/299 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes112,574
source_files_sampled299
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
840commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'mcp-e2e-driver' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'mcp-audit' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 05:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIfastmcp>=3.4.8,<4packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.30.0,<2packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpcore>=1.0.9packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=50.0.2packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIauthlib>=1.8.0packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.7.0packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.5,<3packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.14.2,<3packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7.3packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIplatformdirs>=4.12.3packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPItomli-w>=1.2.0packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
PyPIfilelock>=4.0.9packages/core-py/pyproject.toml
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.30.1packages/core-ts/package.json
npmbetter-sqlite3^13.0.3packages/core-ts/package.json
npmenv-paths^4.0.0packages/core-ts/package.json
npmjose^6.2.12packages/core-ts/package.json
PyPIfastapi>=0.142.2packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.54.0packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime>=1.30.0packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.5.3packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.5,<3packages/embedding-daemon/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=7.2.2scripts/audit/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.43.109scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIbotocore>=1.43.109scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.3scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.6scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=2.3.0,<3scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx2>=2.13.1,<3scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.7.0scripts/e2e/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 154

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.30.1direct
npmbetter-sqlite3^13.0.3direct
npmenv-paths^4.0.0direct
npmjose^6.2.12direct
PyPIauthlib1.9.1direct
PyPIboto31.43.114direct
PyPIbotocore1.43.114direct
PyPIcryptography50.0.2direct
PyPIfastapi0.143.1direct
PyPIfastmcp3.4.8direct
PyPIfilelock4.2.0direct
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIhttpx22.13.1direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIloguru0.7.3direct
PyPImcp1.30.0direct
PyPImcp2.3.0direct
PyPInumpy2.5.4direct
PyPIonnxruntime1.31.0direct
PyPIplatformdirs4.13.0direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpydantic2.14.1direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.16.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIstarlette1.8.0direct
PyPItomli-w1.2.0direct
PyPIuvicorn0.54.0direct
npm@biomejs/biome^2.5.15indirect
npm@types/better-sqlite3^9.6.0indirect
npm@types/node^26.6.4indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v8^5.0.3indirect
npmtypescript^7.0.2indirect
npmvitest^5.0.3indirect
PyPIaiofile3.12.3indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.5indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIawscrt0.36.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.23.1indirect
PyPIcachetools7.2.1indirect
PyPIcaio0.12.9indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.2indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.2indirect
PyPIcyclopts5.2.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim3.4.8indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.9.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.7.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.13.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub2.2.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjiter0.17.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.5indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.5.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlitellm1.103.4indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.4indirect
PyPImcp-audit0.1.0indirect
PyPImcp-e2e-driver0.1.0indirect
PyPImcp-embedding-daemon1.25.11indirect
PyPImcp-types2.3.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.2.1indirect
PyPImultidict7.1.0indirect
PyPIn24q02m-mcp-core1.25.11indirect
PyPIonnxruntime-gpu1.31.0indirect
PyPIopenai2.54.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.6.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.45.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathable0.6.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.4indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.36.2indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.6indirect
PyPIpyaes1.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpycparser3.11indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.50.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.4indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.9.29indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrespx0.23.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst2.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.9.1indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.17.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.5.0indirect
PyPItelethon1.45.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.14.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.3indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.5indirect
PyPIty0.0.87indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.4.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.3.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.2indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.25.1indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@n24q02m/mcp-core@1.25.11 pulls in 99 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.