Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 15:32 UTC

neos / form-builder

Flow Form Framework integration into Neos CMS

PHP · SCSS · JavaScriptGPL-3.0★ 19 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗

neos/form-builder holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (30/100). It was last updated 141 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

NeosOrganization · verified domain

95 followers152 public repossince Mar 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	neos/form-builder	3.0.5	4,865	29	141 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

44Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

19Critical

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 141 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	141
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 29 releases published
27/36	Release recency — latest release 141 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~90.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	29
latest_release_tag	3.0.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	141
mean_days_between_releases	90.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

35Weak

How it's scored

20.4/60	Stars — 19 stars
12.7/25	Forks — 34 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	34
stars	19
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate

How it's scored

49.2/80	Monthly downloads — 4,865 downloads/month across packagist
8.7/20	Registry dependents — 19 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	neos/form-builder
dependents	19
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	377,772
monthly_downloads	4,865
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	22
top_contributor_share	0.533

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good

How it's scored

33.1/42	Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
18.1/30	PR acceptance — 64/106 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

merged_prs	64
open_issues	10
closed_issues	37
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.787
closed_unmerged_prs	42
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

89Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
14.3/25	Owner reach — 95 followers of neos
25/25	Track record — 152 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	95
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	neos
public_repos	152
account_age_days	4,194

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 141 days ago
20/20	Version history — 29 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	neos/form-builder
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	141

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	form, neoscms, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	54
affected_packages	22
assessed_packages	199
unassessed_packages	2
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 12, moderate 7
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 199 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

32At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.2/40	Legible commit history — 58 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.604
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/20 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	5,923
source_files_sampled	20
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

19GitHub stars

22contributors

6commits, last 12 months

141days since last push

29releases

1bus factor

10open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿

0Stars

34Forks

29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 6Patch 20

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 15:32 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7	Code-Review	Found 9/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	50 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	neos/neos	`^9.0`	composer.json
Packagist	neos/form	`^5.0 \|\| ^6.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	neos/form	`—`	direct
Packagist	neos/neos	`—`	direct
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	@neos-project/neos-ui-extensibility	`8.3.10`	indirect
npm	@neos-project/positional-array-sorter	`8.3.10`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.2`	indirect
npm	amdefine	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	aproba	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	are-we-there-yet	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	array-find-index	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	asn1	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	assert-plus	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	async-foreach	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	aws-sign2	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	aws4	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	bcrypt-pbkdf	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	block-stream	`0.0.9`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	camelcase-keys	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	caseless	`0.12.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	cliui	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	code-point-at	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	console-control-strings	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	currently-unhandled	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	dashdash	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	delegates	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ecc-jsbn	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.17.19`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	extsprintf	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	forever-agent	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	form-data	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fstream	`1.0.12`	indirect
npm	gauge	`2.7.4`	indirect
npm	gaze	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	get-stdin	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	getpass	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.6`	indirect
npm	globule	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	har-schema	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	har-validator	`5.1.3`	indirect
npm	has-ansi	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-unicode	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	http-signature	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	in-publish	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	invert-kv	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-builtin-module	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-finite	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-typedarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-utf8	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isstream	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	js-base64	`2.1.9`	indirect
npm	jsbn	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stringify-safe	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsprim	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	lcid	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	load-json-file	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.15`	indirect
npm	loud-rejection	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	map-obj	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	meow	`3.7.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.29.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.44.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.16`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.27`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`0.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	nan	`2.14.1`	indirect
npm	node-gyp	`3.8.0`	indirect
npm	node-sass	`4.14.0`	indirect
npm	nopt	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	npmlog	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	number-is-nan	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	oauth-sign	`0.9.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	os-homedir	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	os-locale	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	os-tmpdir	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	osenv	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-type	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	performance-now	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	pinkie	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	pinkie-promise	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	pseudomap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	psl	`1.8.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.5.2`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	read-pkg-up	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	redent	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	repeating	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	request	`2.88.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-main-filename	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`2.7.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	sass-graph	`2.2.4`	indirect
npm	scss-tokenizer	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	set-blocking	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.4.4`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	sshpk	`1.16.1`	indirect
npm	stdout-stream	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	tar	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	trim-newlines	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	true-case-path	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	tunnel-agent	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	tweetnacl	`0.14.5`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	uuid	`3.4.0`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	verror	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	which-module	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wide-align	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	yallist	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	yargs	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`5.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 22

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 199 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 22 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
json-schema	`0.2.3`	indirect	critical	1	`0.4.0`
minimist	`0.0.8`	indirect	critical	2	`1.2.6`
minimist	`1.2.0`	indirect	critical	2	`1.2.6`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
cross-spawn	`3.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
form-data	`2.3.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.6`
lodash	`4.17.15`	indirect	high	6	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect	high	4	`10.2.3`
qs	`6.5.2`	indirect	high	3	`6.16.0`
scss-tokenizer	`0.2.3`	indirect	high	1	`0.4.3`
semver	`5.3.0`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
tar	`2.2.2`	indirect	high	15	`7.5.21`
trim-newlines	`1.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.1`
uuid	`3.4.0`	indirect	high	1	`13.0.1`
y18n	`3.2.1`	indirect	high	1	`5.0.5`
ajv	`6.12.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`8.18.0`
esbuild	`0.17.19`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
hosted-git-info	`2.5.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`3.0.8`
node-sass	`4.14.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`7.0.0`
request	`2.88.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`3.0.0`
tough-cookie	`2.5.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.1.3`
yargs-parser	`5.0.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`18.1.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records