Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 03:13 UTC

netenglabs / suzieq

Using network observability to operate and design healthier networks

PythonApache-2.0★ 906 stars⑂ 120 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

#networking #network-analysis #data-center #infrastructure #datacenter #python #network-validation #network-monitoring

netenglabs/suzieq holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated 50 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

netenglabsOrganization

34 followers10 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	suzieq	0.25.0	601	44	74 days ago	network cisco arista junos observability cumulus monitoring sonic ios

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 50 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
17.1/18	Commit volume — 80 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	80
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	50
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

47Weak

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 38 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 527 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~124.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	38
latest_release_tag	v0.24.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	527
mean_days_between_releases	124.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

74Good

How it's scored

48/60	Stars — 906 stars
17.3/25	Forks — 120 forks
8.2/15	Watchers — 31 watchers

Inputs used

forks	120
stars	906
watchers	31
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

46Weak

How it's scored

37.1/80	Monthly downloads — 601 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	suzieq
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	601
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	28
top_contributor_share	0.73

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

33.1/42	Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
24.2/30	PR acceptance — 362/448 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	362
open_issues	114
closed_issues	427
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.789
closed_unmerged_prs	86
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
11.1/25	Owner reach — 34 followers of netenglabs
19.6/25	Track record — 10 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	34
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	netenglabs
public_repos	10
account_age_days	2,376

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 74 days ago
20/20	Version history — 44 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	suzieq
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	74

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .flake8, .pylintrc
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.stardustsystems.net/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	networking, network-analysis, data-center, infrastructure, datacenter, python, network-validation, network-monitoring
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.stardustsystems.net/
docs_site	https://www.stardustsystems.net/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 41 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

56Moderate

How it's scored

4.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 5 affected: gitpython 3.1.55 (critical 9.8), asyncssh 2.14.2 (high 8.1), urllib3 2.7.0 (high 7.5), +2 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 689 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	75
affected_packages	10
assessed_packages	192
unassessed_packages	1
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 4, moderate 3, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 192 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40	Legible commit history — 50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.5
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .flake8, .pylintrc
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	poetry.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/264 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	99,767
source_files_sampled	264
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

906GitHub stars

28contributors

80commits, last 12 months

50days since last push

38releases

1bus factor

114open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 120 ⇿

0Stars

120Forks

37Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 11Patch 17

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 03:12 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 3/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	41 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 38

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	aiohttp	`>3.8, <4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	asyncssh	`~2.14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	textfsm	`*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	async-timeout	`>4.0, <5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiofiles	`*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`>2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyarrow	`>=14.0.1,<15.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pandas	`~1.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyYAML	`*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-nubia	`0.2b5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvloop	`*`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	networkx	`~2.8`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	matplotlib	`~3.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	faker	`~4.18`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	netconan	`~0.11.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonpath-ng	`~1.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi	`0.133.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`~0.35.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tabulate	`^0.8.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	streamlit	`1.54.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	graphviz	`^0.15`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	dateparser	`~1.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	natsort	`^8.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	colorama	`^0.4.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tzlocal	`< 3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyparsing	`>=2.2.0, <3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	xmltodict	`~0.12.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	streamlit-aggrid	`1.2.1.post2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ciscoconfparse	`~1.6.21`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	urllib3	`~2.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`~21.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psutil	`~5.9.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jellyfish	`~0.10`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	altair	`>3.2, <5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.7,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`~1.26`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyvmomi	`^8.0.2.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.55`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 193

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 38 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	aiofiles	`24.1.0`	direct
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.1`	direct
PyPI	altair	`4.2.2`	direct
PyPI	async-timeout	`4.0.3`	direct
PyPI	asyncssh	`2.14.2`	direct
PyPI	ciscoconfparse	`1.6.52`	direct
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	direct
PyPI	dateparser	`1.1.8`	direct
PyPI	faker	`4.18.0`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.133.1`	direct
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.55`	direct
PyPI	graphviz	`0.15`	direct
PyPI	jellyfish	`0.10.0`	direct
PyPI	jsonpath-ng	`1.6.1`	direct
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.7.5`	direct
PyPI	natsort	`8.4.0`	direct
PyPI	netconan	`0.11.3`	direct
PyPI	networkx	`2.8.8`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`1.26.4`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`21.3`	direct
PyPI	pandas	`1.5.3`	direct
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.51`	direct
PyPI	psutil	`5.9.8`	direct
PyPI	pyarrow	`14.0.2`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	pyparsing	`2.4.7`	direct
PyPI	python-nubia	`0.2b5`	direct
PyPI	pyvmomi	`8.0.3.0.1`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.2`	direct
PyPI	streamlit	`1.54.0`	direct
PyPI	streamlit-aggrid	`1.2.1.post2`	direct
PyPI	tabulate	`0.8.10`	direct
PyPI	textfsm	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	tzlocal	`2.1`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.35.0`	direct
PyPI	uvloop	`0.21.0`	direct
PyPI	xmltodict	`0.12.0`	direct
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`0.7.16`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	appdirs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`3.3.10`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	autopep8	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	bandit	`1.8.6`	indirect
PyPI	bidict	`0.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	blinker	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2025.7.9`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	configargparse	`0.15.2`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.3.9`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	email-validator	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	entrypoints	`0.4`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	fastapi-cli	`0.0.22`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.7`	indirect
PyPI	flake8	`7.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	future-fstrings	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	icdiff	`2.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.12`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipaddress	`1.0.23`	indirect
PyPI	ipdb	`0.13.13`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.18.1`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`5.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.17.2`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.24.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	loguru	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkautodoc	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mock	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	passlib	`1.7.4`	indirect
PyPI	pbr	`6.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.3.8`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	ply	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pprintpp	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	prettytable	`3.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`6.33.6`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pycodestyle	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`2.22`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-extra-types	`2.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	pydeck	`0.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyflakes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`3.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`0.23.8`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`6.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-depends	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-icdiff	`0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-decouple	`3.8`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pytoolconfig	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2024.11.6`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich-toolkit	`0.19.7`	indirect
PyPI	rope	`1.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`83.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`7.3.7`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autodoc-typehints	`1.25.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	text-unidecode	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	toml	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	toolz	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspect	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.2.13`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`15.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	win32-setctime	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.20.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 192 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
gitpython	`3.1.55`	direct	critical	33	`3.1.62`
anyio	`4.9.0`	indirect	critical	4	`4.14.2`
asyncssh	`2.14.2`	direct	high	6	`2.24.0`
urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct	high	6	`2.8.0`
tornado	`6.5.7`	indirect	high	7	`6.5.9`
virtualenv	`21.6.1`	indirect	high	8	`21.7.13`
aiohttp	`3.14.1`	direct	moderate	6	`3.14.3`
cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`50.0.0`
pytest	`7.2.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
pyarrow	`14.0.2`	direct	unknown	1	`17.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records