Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 01:42 UTC

netresearch / t3x-nr-passkeys-be

TYPO3 extension for passwordless backend authentication via WebAuthn/FIDO2 Passkeys

PHPGPL-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗

netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-be holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Netresearch DTT GmbHOrganization · verified domain
43 followers287 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnetresearch/nr-passkeys-bev0.12.11,4712440 days agoauthenticationbackendtypo3passwordlessfido2webauthnpasskeys

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 533 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year533
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.9 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv0.12.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases7.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesapi.securityscorecards.dev, codecov.io, github.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
42.2/80Monthly downloads — 1,471 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/nr-passkeys-be
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads8,402
monthly_downloads1,471
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.981
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 125/133 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs125
open_issues1
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d16
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of netresearch
25/25Track record — 287 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginnetresearch
public_repos287
account_age_days6,154

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history — 24 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/nr-passkeys-be
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 16 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsauthentication, fido2, passkeys, passwordless, php, typo3, typo3-extension, webauthn
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

89Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

86Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.8/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Silver
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate8.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages129
unassessed_packages18
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 129 resolved dependencies against OSV. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files.ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/workflows/AGENTS.md, .github/workflows/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,116
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/149 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes69,918
source_files_sampled149
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

5GitHub stars
2contributors
533commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.6 / 10
8.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 01:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
7CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Silver
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^12.4 || ^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^12.4 || ^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-setup^12.4 || ^13.4 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagistweb-auth/webauthn-lib^5.3composer.json
All dependencies 147

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 143 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-setup—direct
Packagistweb-auth/webauthn-lib—direct
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color5.1.11indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector7.1.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/generational-cache1.0.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/nwsapi2.3.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.1.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.3.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.2.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.9indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.147.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.63.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.5indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjsdom29.1.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.4indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmplaywright1.63.0indirect
npmplaywright-core1.63.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrolldown1.2.6indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtldts7.4.11indirect
npmtldts-core7.4.11indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.2indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmundici7.29.0indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
Packagistdg/bypass-finals—indirect
Packagistergebnis/phpstan-rules—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistnetresearch/typo3-ci-workflows—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpat/phpat—indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-dashboard—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 129 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.