Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 00:38 UTC

netresearch / t3x-rte_ckeditor_image

Image support in CKEditor for the TYPO3 ecosystem - by Netresearch

PHP · TypeScript · JavaScriptAGPL-3.0★ 61 stars⑂ 67 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginhow this is determined
#ckeditor#typo3#magic-images#ckeditor-plugin#typo3cms-extension#typo3-extension#rte-ckeditor

netresearch/t3x-rte_ckeditor_image holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (68/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Netresearch DTT GmbHOrganization · verified domain
43 followers286 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistnetresearch/rte-ckeditor-imagev13.10.224,3407724 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,431 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,431
human_commit_share0.7
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year41

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 67 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.5 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 4 out of the last 4 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count67
latest_release_tagv13.10.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases15.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

49Weak
How it's scored
28.8/60Stars — 61 stars
15.2/25Forks — 67 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks67
stars61
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
58.5/80Monthly downloads — 24,340 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20Registry dependents — 5 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/rte-ckeditor-image
dependents5
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,105,417
monthly_downloads24,340
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 45 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled45
top_contributor_share0.804

Issue & PR responsiveness

96Exceptional
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 531/596 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs531
open_issues2
closed_issues283
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio0.993
closed_unmerged_prs65
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

87Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of netresearch
25/25Track record — 286 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginnetresearch
public_repos286
account_age_days6,143

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 24 days ago
20/20Version history — 77 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnetresearch/rte-ckeditor-image
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsckeditor, typo3, magic-images, ckeditor-plugin, typo3cms-extension, typo3-extension, rte-ckeditor
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

89Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

86Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.8/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Silver
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 4 out of the last 4 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate8.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages129
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 129 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .github/instructions/code-review.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 70 of 70 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.ddev/AGENTS.md, .ddev/CLAUDE.md, .github/instructions/code-review.instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Classes/AGENTS.md, Classes/CLAUDE.md, Documentation/AGENTS.md, Documentation/CLAUDE.md, Resources/AGENTS.md, Resources/CLAUDE.md, Tests/AGENTS.md, Tests/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,986

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 30 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 3/145 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes162,897
source_files_sampled145
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

61GitHub stars
45contributors
1,431commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
67releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 67 ⇿
0Stars
67Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

013253850636142017-062021-102026-03
Major 4Minor 8Patch 41

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.6 / 10
8.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 00:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
7CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Silver
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases4 out of the last 4 releases have a total of 4 signed artifacts.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^13.4.21 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^13.4.21 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend^13.4.21 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase^13.4.21 || ^14.3composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-rte-ckeditor^13.4.21 || ^14.3composer.json
All dependencies 143

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-rte-ckeditor—direct
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color6.0.5indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector8.3.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.0indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@commitlint/cli^21.0.0indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional^21.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.3.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.1.10indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.7indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.146.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.62.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.0indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmhusky^9.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjsdom30.0.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlint-staged^17.0.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.2indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.62.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.62.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrolldown1.2.5indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.0.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtldts7.0.21indirect
npmtldts-core7.0.21indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.2indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmundici8.9.0indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url17.1.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
Packagistbk2k/bootstrap-package—indirect
Packagistext-dom—indirect
Packagistext-libxml—indirect
Packagistnetresearch/typo3-ci-workflows—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 129 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with netresearch/t3x-rte_ckeditor_image. Read them side by side →

92netresearch/t3x-nr-llmThe shared AI foundation for TYPO3 — one LLM setup for every extension on your siteExcellent89netresearch/t3x-nr-passkeys-beTYPO3 extension for passwordless backend authentication via WebAuthn/FIDO2 PasskeysExcellent89netresearch/t3x-nr-vaultSecure secrets management for TYPO3 with envelope encryption, access control, and audit loggingExcellent88in2code-de/in2publish_corein2publish Community VersionExcellent81FriendsOfTYPO3/extension_builderTYPO3 extension to kickstart and maintain TYPO3 extensionsExcellent80dmind-gmbh/extension-cookiemanA GDPR tracking consent popup for the content management system TYPO3. It asks for approval to include tracking objects (cookies, images or any HTML) and includes the objects when consented.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.