Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 17:02 UTC

nyx-space / anise

A thread-safe alternative to NASA SPICE toolkit, computing spacecraft, planetary, coordinate frame, instrument transformations, ground station visibility, and orbital elements. Engineered for high-throughput Python concurrent execution and flight software, with proven lunar flight heritage.

Rust · PythonMPL-2.0★ 266 stars⑂ 47 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolDesktop applicationhow this is determined

nyx-space/anise holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (63/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nyx SpaceOrganization · verified domain
118 followers5 public repossince Nov 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.ioanise0.10.614,2614210 days ago
PyPIanise0.10.631,1254110 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume701 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year701
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases43 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~20.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tag0.10.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases20.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.3/60Stars266 stars
13.9/25Forks47 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks47
stars266
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
62.1/80Monthly downloads45,386 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesanise, anise
dependents
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads182,580
monthly_downloads45,386
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth20 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.892
How it's scored
37.5/42Issue resolution89% of issues closed
19.2/30PR acceptance348/544 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 10/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs348
open_issues24
closed_issues199
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d16
prs_decided_30d17
issue_closed_ratio0.892
closed_unmerged_prs196
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
14.9/25Owner reach118 followers of nyx-space
15.2/25Track record5 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers118
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginnyx-space
public_repos5
account_age_days1,736

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history42 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesanise, anise
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nyxspace.com/anise
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsattitude, ephemeris, naif, rust, spice
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://nyxspace.com/anise
docs_sitehttps://nyxspace.com/anise
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 10/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages35
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
23.7/40Legible commit history44 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.444
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, anise-cli/Cargo.toml, anise-cpp/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkinganise-py/anise/py.typed
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsanise-py/anise/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, anise-cli/Cargo.toml, anise-cpp/Cargo.toml, anise-gui/Cargo.toml, anise-py/Cargo.toml, anise/Cargo.toml, anise/fuzz/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes1/215 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes62,534
source_files_sampled215
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesnotebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

266GitHub stars
20contributors
701commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
43releases
1bus factor
24open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'anise-py' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'anise-cli' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'anise-cpp' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'anise-gui' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 47 ⇿
0Stars
47Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504622022-012024-052026-08
Major 0Minor 10Patch 33

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 17:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 10/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 55
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioaniseanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4anise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iopretty_env_loggeranise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytesanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemmap2anise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iosnafuanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iologanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iozerocopyanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iohifitimeanise-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaniseanise-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iohifitimeanise-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.iocxxanise-cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaniseanise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iohifitimeanise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iologanise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytesanise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iopretty_env_loggeranise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeframe0.35anise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioegui0.35anise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioegui_extras0.35anise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.iorfd0.17.1anise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioegui_logger0.11.0anise-gui/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaniseanise-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iohifitimeanise-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3anise-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3-loganise-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iohifitimeanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemmap2anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc32fastanise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iologanise/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebraanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iozerocopyanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytesanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iosnafuanise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconst_format0.2anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_derive1anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iotabledanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo3-loganise/Cargo.toml
crates.ionumpyanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iondarrayanise/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.0anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_dhall0.13anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioureq3.0.10anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioplatform-dirs0.3.0anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-embed8.4.0anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10.5anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayonanise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-lexpr0.1.3anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv1anise/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap2.11.4anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iohyperdual=1.5.0anise/Cargo.toml
crates.iosofars0.6.1anise/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 47

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobytesdirect
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.ioconst_formatdirect
crates.iocsvdirect
crates.ioeframedirect
crates.ioeguidirect
crates.ioegui_extrasdirect
crates.ioegui_loggerdirect
crates.iohyperdual1.5.0direct
crates.ioindexmapdirect
crates.ioplatform-dirsdirect
crates.iorayondirect
crates.ioregexdirect
crates.iorfddirect
crates.iorust-embeddirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde-lexprdirect
crates.ioserde_derivedirect
crates.ioserde_dhalldirect
crates.iosofarsdirect
crates.ioureqdirect
crates.iourldirect
crates.ioapproxindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iocxx-buildindirect
crates.ioiai-callgrindindirect
crates.iolibfuzzer-sysindirect
crates.iopolarsindirect
crates.iopoll-promiseindirect
crates.iorandindirect
crates.iorand_pcgindirect
crates.iorust-spiceindirect
crates.ioserde_ymlindirect
crates.iotauri-winresindirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futuresindirect
PyPIhvplot0.12.2indirect
PyPInarwhals2.0.1indirect
PyPInumpyindirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.1indirect
PyPIplotly6.2.0indirect
PyPIpolars1.32.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow21.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pyarrow21.0.0indirecthigh223.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io, PyPI.