Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 17:17 UTC

occamist / laverna

Language is your oyster :hatching_chick:

Go · PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#audio-downloader#google-translate#anki

occamist/laverna holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Talha AltınelPersonal account
64 followers37 public repossince Oct 2016@Akamai

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIaddon0.0.2-12213 days agocalculator
Gogithub.com/occamist/lavernav0.6.1-157 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume — 40 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~38.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv0.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases38.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 25/25 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs25
open_issues0
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13/25Owner reach — 64 followers of occamist
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers64
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginoccamist
public_repos37
account_age_days3,566
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaddon, github.com/occamist/laverna
ecosystemsgo, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaudio-downloader, google-translate, anki
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

31At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes8,798
source_files_sampled24
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
40commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 17:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaqt>=25.9.2addon/pyproject.toml
PyPIflask>=3.1.2addon/pyproject.toml
PyPItypes-waitress>=3.0.1.20250801addon/pyproject.toml
PyPIwaitress>=3.0.2addon/pyproject.toml
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.9.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0go.mod
All dependencies 57

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 48 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.9.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
PyPIaqt25.9.2direct
PyPIflask3.1.2direct
PyPItypes-waitress3.0.1.20250801direct
PyPIwaitress3.0.2direct
PyPIanki25.9.2indirect
PyPIanki-mac-helper0.1.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIflask-cors6.0.2indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.4indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.5indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpip25.3indirect
PyPIpip-system-certs5.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyqt66.9.1indirect
PyPIpyqt6-qt66.9.1indirect
PyPIpyqt6-sip13.10.2indirect
PyPIpyqt6-webengine6.8.0indirect
PyPIpyqt6-webengine-qt66.8.2indirect
PyPIpysocks1.7.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.9indirect
PyPIsend2trash1.8.3indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.2indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with occamist/laverna. Read them side by side →

54lingua-sensei/lavernaLanguage is your oyster :hatching_chick:Moderate54mrwormhole/lavernaLanguage is your oyster :hatching_chick:Moderate73o-murphy/a7pA7P ballistic profile format — encode/decode and validationGood62adamallcock/runcostSmall polyglot cost ledger for LLM and agent API callsModerate88google-ai-edge/mediapipeCross-platform, customizable ML solutions for live and streaming media.Excellent84PSU3D0/formualizerEmbeddable spreadsheet engine - parse, evaluate & mutate Excel workbooks from Rust, Python, or the browser. Arrow-powered, 400+ functions.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, Go.