Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 23:05 UTC

omines / datatables-bundle

DataTables bundle for Symfony

PHPMIT★ 284 stars⑂ 117 forkssince Sep 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

omines/datatables-bundle holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Omines InternetbureauOrganization · verified domain
10 followers7 public repossince Aug 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistomines/datatables-bundle0.10.841,01248104 days agoormsymfonymongodbjquerybundledoctrineelasticadatatablesdatatable

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 10 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
12.4/18Commit volume — 23 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year23
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 48 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 104 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~53.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count48
latest_release_tag0.10.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release104
mean_days_between_releases53.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.8/60Stars — 284 stars
17.2/25Forks — 117 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks117
stars284
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.5/80Monthly downloads — 41,012 downloads/month across packagist
6/20Registry dependents — 7 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesomines/datatables-bundle
dependents7
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,571,584
monthly_downloads41,012
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.825
How it's scored
41.8/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
12.7/30PR acceptance — 81/192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs81
open_issues1
closed_issues217
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.995
closed_unmerged_prs111
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach — 10 followers of omines
18.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginomines
public_repos7
account_age_days4,420

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 104 days ago
20/20Version history — 48 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesomines/datatables-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish104

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://omines.github.io/datatables-bundle/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, symfony, symfony-bundle, datatables-bundle, datatables
has_wikino
homepagehttps://omines.github.io/datatables-bundle/
docs_sitehttps://omines.github.io/datatables-bundle/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.9/40Legible commit history — 18 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.186
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/117 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes268,039
source_files_sampled117
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

284GitHub stars
37contributors
23commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
48releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 117 ⇿
0Stars
117Forks
47Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011532017-112022-012026-04
Major 0Minor 10Patch 28

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 23:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring^1.31.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 39

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 33 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher—direct
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver—direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring—direct
Packagistsymfony/property-access—direct
Packagistsymfony/translation—direct
Packagistdoctrine/common—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/orm—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistence—indirect
Packagistext-curl—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-mbstring—indirect
Packagistext-mongodb—indirect
Packagistext-pdo_sqlite—indirect
Packagistext-zip—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistmongodb/mongodb—indirect
Packagistopenspout/openspout—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpoffice/phpspreadsheet—indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-doctrine—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfony—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistruflin/elastica—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—indirect
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/intl—indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime—indirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.