Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 20:12 UTC

padrino / padrino-framework

Padrino is a full-stack ruby framework built upon Sinatra.

Ruby · LessMIT★ 3,400 stars⑂ 494 forkssince Nov 2009View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#padrino#waf#ruby

padrino/padrino-framework holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (80/100) and lowest on Security (24/100). It was last updated 81 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Padrino FrameworkOrganization
10 followers20 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemspadrino0.16.1-126168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-gen0.16.1-127168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-core0.16.1-127168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-admin0.16.1-127168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-cache0.16.1-93168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-mailer0.16.1-127168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-helpers0.16.1-127168 days ago
RubyGemspadrino-supportpoints to another repo — not scored0.16.1-41168 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

35Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 81 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
12.1/18Commit volume — 21 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year21
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push81
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 56 version tags (no GitHub releases)
27/36Release recency — latest release 168 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~359.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count56
latest_release_tag0.16.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release168
mean_days_between_releases359.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent
How it's scored
57.3/60Stars — 3,400 stars
22.4/25Forks — 494 forks
11.3/15Watchers — 109 watchers
Inputs used
forks494
stars3,400
watchers109
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

58Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
75.3/80Total downloads — 17,820,316 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespadrino, padrino-gen, padrino-core, padrino-admin, padrino-cache, padrino-mailer, padrino-helpers
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads17,820,316
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.304

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
40.8/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance — 710/912 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs710
open_issues40
closed_issues1,362
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.971
closed_unmerged_prs202
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach — 10 followers of padrino
21.6/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpadrino
public_repos20
account_age_days6,146

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 168 days ago
20/20Version history — 127 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespadrino, padrino-gen, padrino-core, padrino-admin, padrino-cache, padrino-mailer, padrino-helpers
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish168

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

78Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://www.padrinorb.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspadrino, waf, ruby
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://www.padrinorb.com
docs_sitehttp://www.padrinorb.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

24At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

24At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 14/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier24
security_posture_before_jurisdiction49
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

42Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.padrinorb.com/llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 49 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.padrinorb.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 4/302 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes96,381
source_files_sampled302
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — sample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,400GitHub stars
99contributors
21commits, last 12 months
81days since last push
56releases
2bus factor
40open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-17: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 3400 stars today.
  • rubygems package 'padrino-support' points at a different repository (http://www.padrinorb.com); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 3,402 ★ / 494 ⇿
3,402Stars
494Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-17. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

01,2502,5003,7503,402480322010-022018-042026-07
Major 0Minor 6Patch 50

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 20:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests13 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 14/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 76 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsactivesupport—Gemfile
RubyGemsjdbc-sqlite3~> 3.7.2Gemfile
RubyGemssequel—Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite3~> 1.7Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite3—Gemfile
RubyGemsliquid>= 2.1.1Gemfile
RubyGemsslim>= 1.3.0Gemfile
RubyGemshamlit—Gemfile
RubyGemshaml—Gemfile
RubyGemshaml>= 5Gemfile
RubyGemserubis>= 2.7.0Gemfile
RubyGemserubi>= 1.6.1Gemfile
RubyGemsbuilder>= 2.1.2Gemfile
RubyGemslogger>= 1.6Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest>= 4.0Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-mock>= 1.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmocha>= 2.0Gemfile
RubyGemsnokogiri>= 1.13Gemfile
RubyGemsrack~> 3Gemfile
RubyGemsrackup~> 2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrack-test~> 2.1Gemfile
RubyGemsrake>= 10.5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrb-readline~> 0.4.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop~> 1.6Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest~>0.34.4Gemfile
RubyGemswebmock~> 3.19Gemfile
RubyGemsyard>= 0.7.2Gemfile
RubyGemsjruby-openssl—Gemfile
All dependencies 35

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 11 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsbuilder—direct
RubyGemserubi—direct
RubyGemserubis—direct
RubyGemshaml—direct
RubyGemshamlit—direct
RubyGemsjdbc-sqlite3—direct
RubyGemsjruby-openssl—direct
RubyGemsliquid—direct
RubyGemslogger—direct
RubyGemsminitest—direct
RubyGemsmocha—direct
RubyGemsnokogiri—direct
RubyGemsrack—direct
RubyGemsrack-test—direct
RubyGemsrackup—direct
RubyGemsrake—direct
RubyGemsrb-readline—direct
RubyGemsrubocop—direct
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest—direct
RubyGemssequel—direct
RubyGemsslim—direct
RubyGemssqlite3—direct
RubyGemswebmock—direct
RubyGemsyard—direct
RubyGemsbundler—indirect
RubyGemsi18n—indirect
RubyGemsless—indirect
RubyGemsmail—indirect
RubyGemsmime-types—indirect
RubyGemsmoneta—indirect
RubyGemsostruct—indirect
RubyGemssinatra—indirect
RubyGemstherubyracer—indirect
RubyGemsthor—indirect
RubyGemstilt—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with padrino/padrino-framework. Read them side by side →

93ddnexus/pagyAgnostic pagination in plain rubyExceptional99opf/openprojectOpenProject is the leading open source project management software for product, project and portfolio management. A powerful Jira alternative with agile planning, issue tracking, roadmaps, Gantt charts, time tracking, collaboration features, and more. Available on premises or in the cloud. ⭐ Star us on GitHubExceptional99fluent/fluentdFluentd: Unified Logging Layer (project under CNCF)Exceptional98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional98open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ruby-contribContrib Packages for the OpenTelemetry Ruby API and SDK implementation.Exceptional98ruby/rubygemsLibrary packaging and distribution for Ruby.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.