Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 19:29 UTC

panoramicdata / AutoTask.Psa.Api

Datto Autotask PSA REST API

C#MIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗

panoramicdata/AutoTask.Psa.Api holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (71/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Panoramic Data LimitedOrganization · verified domain
12 followers120 public repossince May 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetAutoTask.Psa.Api1.1.16-50 days agoautotaskdattopsarestapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 5 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~33.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tag1.1.16
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases33.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.1/80Total downloads — 33,765 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAutoTask.Psa.Api
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads33,765
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.74

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — 0/26 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues2
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of panoramicdata
25/25Track record — 120 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginpanoramicdata
public_repos120
account_age_days3,024

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAutoTask.Psa.Api
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

43Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

38Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

8Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.5/40Legible commit history — 11 of 78 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.141
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

31At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj, AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2.6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 78 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.013
toolchain_manifestsAutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj, AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/453 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes41,077
source_files_sampled453
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
3contributors
15commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 19:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAsyncFixer—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions.Analyzers—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecrets—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetXunit.Microsoft.DependencyInjection—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test/AutoTask.Psa.Api.Test.csproj
NuGetAsyncFixer—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
NuGetRefit—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations—AutoTask.Psa.Api/AutoTask.Psa.Api.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAsyncFixer—direct
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—direct
NuGetAwesomeAssertions.Analyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecrets—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—direct
NuGetNerdbank.GitVersioning—direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—direct
NuGetRefit—direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations—direct
NuGetXunit.Microsoft.DependencyInjection—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
NuGetxunit.v3—direct
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with panoramicdata/AutoTask.Psa.Api. Read them side by side →

96Azure/data-api-builderData API builder provides modern REST, GraphQL endpoints and MCP tools to your Azure Databases and on-prem stores.Exceptional94dotnet/dev-proxySimulate API failures, throttling, and chaos — all from your command line.Exceptional92ubisoft/NGitLab.NET client for the GitLab REST APIExcellent91twilio/twilio-csharpTwilio C#/.NET Helper Library for .NET6+.Excellent99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional99axios/axiosPromise based HTTP client for the browser and node.jsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.