Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 09:39 UTC

ubisoft / NGitLab

.NET client for the GitLab REST API

C#MIT★ 174 stars⑂ 84 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗
#ci-cd#client-library#dotnet#gitlab#gitlab-api#gitlab-ci#gitlab-client#rest-api

ubisoft/NGitLab holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (49/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

UbisoftOrganization · verified domain
845 followers63 public repossince Jul 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetNGitLab.Mock12.1.0-2440 days agogitlabrestapiclient
NuGetNGitLab12.1.0-2510 days agogitlabrestapiclient

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 147 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year147
human_commit_share0.26
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag12.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases20.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

57Moderate
How it's scored
36.3/60Stars — 174 stars
16/25Forks — 84 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks84
stars174
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

91Excellent
How it's scored
72.7/80Total downloads — 9,895,591 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNGitLab.Mock, NGitLab
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads9,895,591
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

89Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

84Excellent
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 91 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled91
top_contributor_share0.217

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent
How it's scored
31.4/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 916/1,030 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs916
open_issues19
closed_issues56
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.747
closed_unmerged_prs114
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

96Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21/25Owner reach — 845 followers of ubisoft
25/25Track record — 63 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers845
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginubisoft
public_repos63
account_age_days3,319

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 251 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNGitLab.Mock, NGitLab
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsci-cd, client-library, dotnet, gitlab, gitlab-api, gitlab-ci, gitlab-client, rest-api
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

78Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 26 of 26 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj, NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj, NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 74 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsNGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj, NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj, NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj, NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.74

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/670 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes83,030
source_files_sampled670
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

174GitHub stars
91contributors
147commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
19open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 84 ⇿
0Stars
84Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008322021-062023-122026-06
Major 5Minor 56Patch 33

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.8 / 10
7.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 09:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit—NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers—NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter—NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.NUnit—NGitLab.Mock.Tests/NGitLab.Mock.Tests.csproj
NuGetLibGit2Sharp—NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers—NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj
NuGetNeoSmart.AsyncLock—NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet—NGitLab.Mock/NGitLab.Mock.csproj
NuGetDocker.DotNet—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Versioning—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetNSubstitute—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetPolly—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—NGitLab.Tests/NGitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers—NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces—NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
NuGetPolySharp—NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations—NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json—NGitLab/NGitLab.csproj
All dependencies 19

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector—direct
NuGetDocker.DotNet—direct
NuGetLibGit2Sharp—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright—direct
NuGetNeoSmart.AsyncLock—direct
NuGetNSubstitute—direct
NuGetNuGet.Versioning—direct
NuGetNUnit—direct
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers—direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter—direct
NuGetPolly—direct
NuGetPolySharp—direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations—direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json—direct
NuGetVerify.NUnit—direct
NuGetYamlDotNet—direct
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ubisoft/NGitLab. Read them side by side →

96python-gitlab/python-gitlabA python wrapper for the GitLab API.Exceptional99scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional99axios/axiosPromise based HTTP client for the browser and node.jsExceptional98swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional97discordjs/discord.jsA powerful JavaScript library for interacting with the Discord APIExceptional97apify/apify-client-pythonApify API client for Python—Programmatically run Actors, manage and stream data from storages (datasets, key-value stores, request queues), schedule and monitor runs, and access the full Apify platform API. Sync and async interfaces with automatic retries and pagination.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.