Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 12:41 UTC

patchlevel / worker

Gives the opportunity to build a stable worker that terminates properly when limits are exceeded.

PHPMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2023View on GitHub ↗

patchlevel/worker holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

patchlevelOrganization
16 followers23 public repossince Aug 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistpatchlevel/worker1.5.027,2949288 days agoconsoleworker

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 137 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year137
human_commit_share0.1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year36
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 288 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~108.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tag1.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release288
mean_days_between_releases108.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.1/80Monthly downloads — 27,294 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagespatchlevel/worker
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads654,928
monthly_downloads27,294
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 65% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.653
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
18.3/30PR acceptance — 28/46 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs28
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.8/25Owner reach — 16 followers of patchlevel
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers16
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpatchlevel
public_repos23
account_age_days2,228
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 288 days ago
20/20Version history — 9 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespatchlevel/worker
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish288

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://patchlevel.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://patchlevel.dev
docs_sitehttps://patchlevel.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages134
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 134 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://patchlevel.dev/llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://patchlevel.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 90 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes9,018
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

5GitHub stars
2contributors
137commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2024-07-02: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 5 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 2 ★ / 0 ⇿
2Stars

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2024-07-02. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

111222212024-042024-052024-07
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 12:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^5.4.26 || ^6.4.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0composer.json
Packagistroave/backward-compatibility-check^8.16.0tools/composer.json
All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistroave/backward-compatibility-check8.21.0direct
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.1.5direct
Packagistbeberlei/assert3.3.4indirect
Packagistcolinodell/json53.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle1.5.14indirect
Packagistcomposer/class-map-generator1.7.3indirect
Packagistcomposer/composer2.10.3indirect
Packagistcomposer/metadata-minifier1.0.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/spdx-licenses1.6.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistinfection/abstract-testframework-adapter0.5.1indirect
Packagistinfection/extension-installer0.1.2indirect
Packagistinfection/include-interceptor0.2.5indirect
Packagistinfection/infection0.32.7indirect
Packagistinfection/mutator0.4.1indirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs2026.2indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.12.0indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.10.1indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.6indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.5indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistnikolaposa/version4.2.1indirect
Packagistocramius/package-versions2.12.0indirect
Packagistondram/ci-detector4.2.0indirect
Packagistpatchlevel/coding-standard1.3.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/async6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/channel6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/collection6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/comparison6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/date-time6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/default6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/dict6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/either-or-both6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/env6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/file6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/filesystem6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/foundation6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/interoperability6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/io6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/iter6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/json6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/locale6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/option6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/process6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/promise6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/range6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/regex6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/result6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/shell6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/str6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/type6.2.1indirect
Packagistphp-standard-library/vec6.2.1indirect
Packagistphpat/phpat0.12.4indirect
Packagistphpbench/container2.2.3indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench1.7.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.13indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.18indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.56indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.9indirect
Packagistroave/better-reflection6.73.0indirect
Packagistsanmai/di-container0.1.23indirect
Packagistsanmai/duoclock0.1.3indirect
Packagistsanmai/later0.1.8indirect
Packagistsanmai/pipeline7.10indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistseld/phar-utils1.2.2indirect
Packagistseld/signal-handler2.0.2indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.22.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.6indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.42.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper8.1.6indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe3.4.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
Packagistwnx/commonmark-markdown-renderer1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 134 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.