Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 17:11 UTC

plausible / prima

Headless UI component library for Phoenix Liveview

Elixir · JavaScriptMIT★ 14 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

plausible/prima holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (81/100) and lowest on Security (36/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Plausible AnalyticsOrganization · verified domain
859 followers21 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Hexprima0.3.05,058195 days ago
npmprima0.0.176712981 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 215 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year215
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.3.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
18.1/60Stars — 14 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars14
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.4/80Monthly downloads — 5,058 downloads/month across hex
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesprima
dependents—
ecosystemshex
total_downloads27,922
monthly_downloads5,058
unverified_packages_excludedprima
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.959
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
22.1/30PR acceptance — 28/38 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs28
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d6
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21.1/25Owner reach — 859 followers of plausible
21.8/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers859
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginplausible
public_repos21
account_age_days2,604

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on hex, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 19 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesprima, prima
ecosystemshex, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://prima-lingering-feather-539.fly.dev/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselixir, liveview, phoenix, phoenix-liveview
has_wikino
homepagehttps://prima-lingering-feather-539.fly.dev/
docs_sitehttps://prima-lingering-feather-539.fly.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 50 affected: babel-traverse 6.26.0 (critical 9.3), eventsource 0.1.6 (critical 9.3), loader-utils 0.2.17 (critical 9.8), +47 more
4.6/40No advisories left outstanding — 44 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,844 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories102
affected_packages50
assessed_packages1,205
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 29, moderate 17
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:prima@0.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1205 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.3/40Legible commit history — 70 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.7
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,511
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — demo/mix.exs, mix.exs (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsdemo/mix.exs, mix.exs
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Elixir without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/81 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageElixir
largest_source_bytes21,607
source_files_sampled81
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

14GitHub stars
3contributors
215commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412025-112026-042026-09
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 17:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsinternal error: internal error: Client.Repositories.ListStatuses: internal error: ListStatuses: GET https://api.github.com/repos/plausible/prima/commits/2fe57ba5e53f40df73dd8ab5cafe58e9eb3b1b23/statuses: 500 []
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@floating-ui/dom^1.6.3assets/package.json
Hexphoenix>= 1.7.0mix.exs
Hexphoenix_html~> 4.2mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 1.1mix.exs
Hexesbuild~> 0.7mix.exs
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 50

Installing npm:prima@0.0.1 pulls in 1,205 packages, direct and transitive: 50 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
babel-traverse6.26.0indirectcritical18.0.0-alpha.4
eventsource0.1.6indirectcritical12.0.2
loader-utils0.2.17indirectcritical12.0.3
shell-quote1.6.1indirectcritical21.9.0
ansi-html0.0.7indirecthigh10.0.8
braces1.8.5indirecthigh23.0.3
braces2.3.2indirecthigh23.0.3
braces3.0.3indirecthigh1—
browserslist1.7.7indirecthigh24.28.7
browserslist2.11.3indirecthigh24.28.7
cross-spawn5.1.0indirecthigh17.0.5
decode-uri-component0.2.2indirecthigh10.5.0
elliptic6.6.1indirecthigh1—
form-data2.3.3indirecthigh24.0.6
html-minifier3.5.21indirecthigh1—
http-proxy-middleware0.17.4indirecthigh24.1.0
ip1.1.9indirecthigh1—
is-svg2.1.0indirecthigh24.3.0
js-yaml3.7.0indirecthigh74.3.2
json50.5.1indirecthigh12.2.2
merge1.2.1indirecthigh12.1.1
minimatch3.0.3indirecthigh410.2.3
node-forge0.10.0indirecthigh141.4.0
postcss5.2.18indirecthigh68.5.23
postcss6.0.23indirecthigh68.5.23
serialize-javascript1.9.1indirecthigh37.0.3
ssri5.3.0indirecthigh18.0.1
tmp0.0.33indirecthigh20.2.6
trim-newlines1.0.0indirecthigh14.0.1
uuid2.0.3indirecthigh113.0.1
uuid3.4.0indirecthigh113.0.1
webpack-dev-middleware1.12.2indirecthigh28.3.0
webpack-dev-server2.9.4indirecthigh75.2.6
ajv5.5.2indirectmoderate28.18.0
color-string0.3.0indirectmoderate11.5.5
got6.7.1indirectmoderate112.1.0
mem1.1.0indirectmoderate14.0.0
micromatch2.3.11indirectmoderate14.0.8
micromatch3.1.10indirectmoderate14.0.8
node-notifier5.4.5indirectmoderate18.0.1
postcss-selector-parser2.2.3indirectmoderate17.1.6
qs6.5.5indirectmoderate26.16.0
react-dev-utils5.0.3indirectmoderate111.0.4
request2.88.2indirectmoderate13.0.0
sockjs0.3.18indirectmoderate10.3.20
sprintf-js1.0.3indirectmoderate1—
tough-cookie2.5.0indirectmoderate14.1.3
yargs-parser4.2.1indirectmoderate118.1.1
yargs-parser7.0.0indirectmoderate118.1.1
yargs-parser8.1.0indirectmoderate118.1.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex, npm.