Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 13:34 UTC

po-ui / po-angular

Biblioteca de componentes Angular.

TypeScriptMIT★ 1,008 stars⑂ 237 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

po-ui/po-angular holds a health index of 97 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (61/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

97
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

97
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 85 is calibrated to 97 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PO UIOrganization
305 followers10 public repossince Mar 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume195 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year195
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~6.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv21.23.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.7/60Stars1,008 stars
19.8/25Forks237 forks
8.1/15Watchers30 watchers
Inputs used
forks237
stars1,008
watchers30
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

89Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 13% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth75 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled75
top_contributor_share0.127
How it's scored
35.9/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance1,812/2,032 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,812
open_issues89
closed_issues519
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.854
closed_unmerged_prs220
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
17.9/25Owner reach305 followers of po-ui
19.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers305
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginpo-ui
public_repos10
account_age_days2,674
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://po-ui.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsangular, ui-components, frontend, angular-components, enterprise, po, po-ui, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://po-ui.io
docs_sitehttps://po-ui.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/instructions/agents-instructions.md, .github/instructions/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.github/instructions/agents-instructions.md, .github/instructions/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,527
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checkingprojects/mcp/tsconfig.json, projects/schematics/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsprojects/mcp/tsconfig.json, projects/schematics/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes20/1,882 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes154,801
source_files_sampled1,882
oversized_source_files20
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,008GitHub stars
75contributors
195commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
6bus factor
89open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 13:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@angular/animations~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/cdk~21.2.14package.json
npm@angular/common~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/compiler~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/core~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/forms~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic~21.2.17package.json
npm@angular/router~21.2.17package.json
npm@capacitor/core5.7.2package.json
npm@capacitor/network^5.0.7package.json
npm@po-ui/style21.23.1package.json
npmcustom-idle-queue4.0.0package.json
npmdriver.js~1.4.0package.json
npmecharts^6.1.0package.json
npmhttp-status-codes^2.3.0package.json
npmlocalforage1.10.0package.json
npmlokijs1.5.12package.json
npmmonaco-editor0.44.0package.json
npmrxjs~7.8.1package.json
npmtslib^2.6.2package.json
npmzone.js~0.15.0package.json
All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 68 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@angular/animations~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/cdk~21.2.14direct
npm@angular/common~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/compiler~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/core~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/forms~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/platform-browser~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic~21.2.17direct
npm@angular/router~21.2.17direct
npm@capacitor/core5.7.2direct
npm@capacitor/core^6.2.0direct
npm@capacitor/network^5.0.7direct
npm@capacitor/network^6.0.1direct
npm@po-ui/style0.0.0-PLACEHOLDERdirect
npm@po-ui/style21.23.1direct
npmcustom-idle-queue3.0.1direct
npmcustom-idle-queue4.0.0direct
npmdriver.js~1.4.0direct
npmecharts^6.1.0direct
npmhttp-status-codes^2.3.0direct
npmlocalforage1.10.0direct
npmlokijs1.5.12direct
npmmonaco-editor0.44.0direct
npmrxjs~7.8.1direct
npmtslib^2.6.2direct
npmzone.js~0.15.0direct
npm@angular-devkit/build-angular~21.2.17indirect
npm@angular-eslint/builder^21.1.0indirect
npm@angular-eslint/eslint-plugin^21.1.0indirect
npm@angular-eslint/eslint-plugin-template^21.1.0indirect
npm@angular-eslint/schematics^21.1.0indirect
npm@angular-eslint/template-parser^21.1.0indirect
npm@angular/cli~21.2.17indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli~21.2.17indirect
npm@angular/language-service~21.2.17indirect
npm@animaliads/animalia-icon^1.1.0indirect
npm@commitlint/cli^18.4.3indirect
npm@commitlint/config-angular^18.4.3indirect
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.12.1indirect
npm@po-ui/ng-components0.0.0-PLACEHOLDERindirect
npm@po-ui/ng-schematics0.0.0-PLACEHOLDERindirect
npm@po-ui/ng-schematics^18.0.0indirect
npm@po-ui/ng-storage0.0.0-PLACEHOLDERindirect
npm@types/jasmine~5.1.4indirect
npm@types/jasminewd2~2.0.13indirect
npm@types/jest^30.0.0indirect
npm@types/node25.0.1indirect
npm@types/node^20.11.0indirect
npm@types/resize-observer-browser^0.1.11indirect
npm@types/systemjs^6.13.5indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^8.33.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.33.1indirect
npmcapitalize^2.0.4indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcore-js3.33.3indirect
npmcore-js^3.33.3indirect
npmdel^6.0.0indirect
npmdotenv^16.5.0indirect
npmeslint^9.28.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsdoclatestindirect
npmeslint-plugin-prefer-arrowlatestindirect
npmeslint-plugin-sonarjslatestindirect
npmfast-check4.8.0indirect
npmgulp^5.0.1indirect
npmgulp-clean^0.4.0indirect
npmgulp-tap^2.0.0indirect
npmhighlight.js^11.9.0indirect
npmhusky^8.0.0indirect
npmintl^1.2.5indirect
npmjasmine2.8.0indirect
npmjasmine-core5.1.1indirect
npmjasmine-spec-reporter7.0.0indirect
npmjest^30.3.0indirect
npmjsonc-parser^3.2.0indirect
npmkarma6.4.2indirect
npmkarma-chrome-launcher3.2.0indirect
npmkarma-coverage2.2.1indirect
npmkarma-jasmine5.1.0indirect
npmkarma-jasmine-html-reporter2.1.0indirect
npmlint-staged^15.1.0indirect
npmmkdirp3.0.1indirect
npmng-packagr~21.2.5indirect
npmngx-markdown^21.0.1indirect
npmprettier^3.9.4indirect
npmrollup4.60.1indirect
npmrun-sequence^2.2.1indirect
npmrxjs-compat~6.6.7indirect
npmstandard-version^9.5.0indirect
npmts-jest^29.4.6indirect
npmts-node~10.9.1indirect
npmtypemoq^2.1.0indirect
npmtypescript~5.9.3indirect
npmyargs^17.7.2indirect
npmzod^3.23.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.