Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 14:58 UTC

redimp / otterwiki

A minimalistic wiki powered by python, markdown and git.

Python · JavaScriptMIT★ 1,478 stars⑂ 119 forkssince Jul 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#markdown#wiki#git

redimp/otterwiki holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (43/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ralph ThesenPersonal account
29 followers18 public repossince Aug 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIotterwiki2.21.1665172 days agowikigitmarkdown

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 459 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year459
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 66 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~11 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count66
latest_release_tagv2.21.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases11
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good
How it's scored
51.4/60Stars — 1,478 stars
17.3/25Forks — 119 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks119
stars1,478
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

47Weak
How it's scored
37.6/80Monthly downloads — 665 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesotterwiki
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads665
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.818

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
35.6/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
23/30PR acceptance — 116/151 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs116
open_issues47
closed_issues260
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.847
closed_unmerged_prs35
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach — 29 followers of redimp
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginredimp
public_repos18
account_age_days6,188
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesotterwiki
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://otterwiki.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmarkdown, wiki, git
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://otterwiki.com
docs_sitehttps://otterwiki.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

74Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/auth_examples/header-auth-different-headers/Makefile, docs/auth_examples/header-auth/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/auth_examples/header-auth-different-headers/Makefile, docs/auth_examples/header-auth/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

46Weak
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
45.7/55Manageable file sizes — 29/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes3,164,970
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files29

Key facts

1,478GitHub stars
31contributors
459commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
66releases
1bus factor
47open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'otterwiki-cm6' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 14:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 43
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmcodemirror^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/commands^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-javascript^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-python^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-xml^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-markdown^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-php^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-sql^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-go^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-rust^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-yaml^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-html^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-css^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-json^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/legacy-modes^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/search^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/autocomplete^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lint^6.9.5frontend/package.json
npm@lezer/common^1.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@lezer/highlight^1.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@lezer/markdown^1.0.0frontend/package.json
PyPIWerkzeug==3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIFlask-Login==0.6.3pyproject.toml
PyPIFlask-Mail==0.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.36pyproject.toml
PyPIFlask-SQLAlchemy==3.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIFlask==3.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIJinja2==3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython==3.1.50pyproject.toml
PyPIcython==3.0.11pyproject.toml
PyPImistune==3.3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpygments==2.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow==12.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML==6.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIunidiff==0.7.5pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4==4.12.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpluggy==1.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIregex==2026.2.28pyproject.toml
PyPIfeedgen==1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-wtf==1.2.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 44 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@codemirror/autocomplete6.20.1direct
npm@codemirror/commands6.10.3direct
npm@codemirror/lang-css6.3.1direct
npm@codemirror/lang-go6.0.1direct
npm@codemirror/lang-html6.4.11direct
npm@codemirror/lang-javascript6.2.5direct
npm@codemirror/lang-json6.0.2direct
npm@codemirror/lang-markdown6.5.0direct
npm@codemirror/lang-php6.0.2direct
npm@codemirror/lang-python6.2.1direct
npm@codemirror/lang-rust6.0.2direct
npm@codemirror/lang-sql6.10.0direct
npm@codemirror/lang-xml6.1.0direct
npm@codemirror/lang-yaml6.1.3direct
npm@codemirror/language6.12.3direct
npm@codemirror/legacy-modes6.5.2direct
npm@codemirror/lint6.9.5direct
npm@codemirror/search6.6.0direct
npm@codemirror/state6.6.0direct
npm@codemirror/view6.41.1direct
npm@lezer/common1.5.2direct
npm@lezer/highlight1.2.3direct
npm@lezer/markdown1.6.3direct
npmcodemirror6.0.2direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup4—direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.3direct
PyPIcython3.0.11direct
PyPIfeedgen1.0.0direct
PyPIflask3.1.3direct
PyPIflask-login0.6.3direct
PyPIflask-mail0.10.0direct
PyPIflask-sqlalchemy3.1.1direct
PyPIflask-wtf1.2.2direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.50direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPImistune3.3.3direct
PyPIpillow12.2.0direct
PyPIpluggy1.5.0direct
PyPIpygments2.20.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2direct
PyPIregex2026.2.28direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.36direct
PyPIunidiff0.7.5direct
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.6direct
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@lezer/css1.3.3indirect
npm@lezer/go1.0.1indirect
npm@lezer/html1.3.13indirect
npm@lezer/javascript1.5.4indirect
npm@lezer/json1.0.3indirect
npm@lezer/lr1.4.10indirect
npm@lezer/php1.0.5indirect
npm@lezer/python1.1.18indirect
npm@lezer/rust1.0.2indirect
npm@lezer/xml1.0.6indirect
npm@lezer/yaml1.0.4indirect
npm@marijn/find-cluster-break1.0.2indirect
npmcrelt1.0.6indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmstyle-mod4.1.3indirect
npmw3c-keyname2.2.8indirect
PyPItypes-flask—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with redimp/otterwiki. Read them side by side →

97toeverything/AFFiNEThere can be more than Notion and Miro. AFFiNE(pronounced [ə‘fain]) is a next-gen knowledge base that brings planning, sorting and creating all together. Privacy first, open-source, customizable and ready to use. Exceptional95siyuan-note/siyuanA privacy-first, self-hosted, fully open source personal knowledge management software, written in typescript and golang.Exceptional93growilabs/growi:anchor: GROWI - Team collaboration software using markdownExceptional92nextcloud/collectivesYour space to collaboratively write and organize. Collectives is designed for groups and communities to structure shared knowledge and cultivate trust.Excellent87iamgio/quarkdown🪐 Markdown with superpowers: from ideas to papers, presentations, websites, books, and knowledge bases.Excellent86jgravelle/jdocmunch-mcpThe leading, most token-efficient MCP server for documentation exploration and retrieval via structured section indexingExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.