Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 07:42 UTC

royben / Resonance

High Performance Real-Time C# Communication Library.

C#MIT★ 52 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

royben/Resonance holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (53/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

42
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Roy Ben ShabatPersonal account
18 followers9 public repossince Nov 2011Sirilix

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

53Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases31 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~212 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv2.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases212
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
27.7/60Stars52 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars52
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.6/80Total downloads47,286 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesResonance.Bluetooth, Resonance.LZ4, Resonance.MessagePack, Resonance.Protobuf, Resonance.SignalR
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads47,286
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution0% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance48/48 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs48
open_issues2
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.2/25Owner reach18 followers of royben
19.3/25Track record9 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginroyben
public_repos9
account_age_days5,372
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history9 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesResonance.Bluetooth, Resonance.LZ4, Resonance.MessagePack, Resonance.Protobuf, Resonance.SignalR
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

35Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsresonance, communication-library, tcp, csharp, udp, usb, webrtc, signalr, network, socket, named-pipes, transport
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages25
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.7/40Legible commit history22 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.22
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsource/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Example.Bluetooth.Common/Resonance.Example.Bluetooth.Common.csproj, source/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.MauiClient/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.MauiClient.csproj, source/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.Server/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.Server.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifestssource/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Example.Bluetooth.Common/Resonance.Example.Bluetooth.Common.csproj, source/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.MauiClient/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.MauiClient.csproj, source/Examples/Bluetooth/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.Server/Resonance.Examples.Bluetooth.Server.csproj, source/Examples/Common/Resonance.Examples.Common/Resonance.Examples.Common.csproj, source/Examples/Common/Resonance.Examples.Logging/Resonance.Examples.Logging.csproj, source/Examples/RPC/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Client/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Client.csproj, source/Examples/RPC/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Common/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Common.csproj, source/Examples/RPC/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Server/Resonance.Examples.RPC.Server.csproj, source/Examples/SharedMemory/Resonance.Example.SharedMemory.Client/Resonance.Example.SharedMemory.Client.csproj, source/Examples/SignalR/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Client/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Client.csproj, source/Examples/SignalR/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Common/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Common.csproj, source/Examples/SignalR/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Server/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Server.csproj, source/Examples/SignalR/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Service/Resonance.Examples.SignalR.Service.csproj, source/Examples/TCP/Resonance.Examples.TCP.Client/Resonance.Examples.TCP.Client.csproj, source/Examples/TCP/Resonance.Examples.TCP.Server/Resonance.Examples.TCP.Server.csproj, source/Examples/UDP_Broadcast/Resonance.Examples.UDP.BroadcastClient/Resonance.Examples.UDP.BroadcastClient.csproj, source/Examples/WebRTC/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Client/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Client.csproj, source/Examples/WebRTC/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Common/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Common.csproj, source/Examples/WebRTC/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Server/Resonance.Examples.WebRTC.Server.csproj, source/Resonance.Benchmarks/Resonance.Benchmarks.csproj, source/Resonance.Bluetooth/Resonance.Bluetooth.csproj, source/Resonance.LZ4/Resonance.LZ4.csproj, source/Resonance.MessagePack/Resonance.MessagePack.csproj, source/Resonance.Messages/Resonance.Messages.csproj, source/Resonance.Protobuf/Resonance.Protobuf.csproj, source/Resonance.SignalR/Resonance.SignalR.csproj, source/Resonance.Tests.SignalRCore.WebAPI/Resonance.Tests.SignalRCore.WebAPI.csproj, source/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj, source/Resonance.USB/Resonance.USB.csproj, source/Resonance.WebRTC/Resonance.WebRTC.csproj, source/Resonance/Resonance.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/360 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes137,534
source_files_sampled360
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

52GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
2open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612022-012023-062024-10

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 07:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNetsource/Resonance.Benchmarks/Resonance.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetInTheHand.Net.Bluetoothsource/Resonance.Bluetooth/Resonance.Bluetooth.csproj
NuGetK4os.Compression.LZ4source/Resonance.LZ4/Resonance.LZ4.csproj
NuGetMessagePacksource/Resonance.MessagePack/Resonance.MessagePack.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobufsource/Resonance.Messages/Resonance.Messages.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobufsource/Resonance.Protobuf/Resonance.Protobuf.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Clientsource/Resonance.SignalR/Resonance.SignalR.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Protocols.MessagePacksource/Resonance.SignalR/Resonance.SignalR.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Protocols.MessagePacksource/Resonance.Tests.SignalRCore.WebAPI/Resonance.Tests.SignalRCore.WebAPI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdksource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdaptersource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFrameworksource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionssource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Protobufsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Loggingsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consolesource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debugsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Filesource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Seqsource/Resonance.Tests/Resonance.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionssource/Resonance.USB/Resonance.USB.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Portssource/Resonance.USB/Resonance.USB.csproj
NuGetSystem.Managementsource/Resonance.USB/Resonance.USB.csproj
NuGetSIPSorcerysource/Resonance.WebRTC/Resonance.WebRTC.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingsource/Resonance/Resonance.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionssource/Resonance/Resonance.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsource/Resonance/Resonance.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json.Bsonsource/Resonance/Resonance.csproj
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNetdirect
NuGetGoogle.Protobufdirect
NuGetInTheHand.Net.Bluetoothdirect
NuGetK4os.Compression.LZ4direct
NuGetMessagePackdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Clientdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Protocols.MessagePackdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkdirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapterdirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFrameworkdirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsondirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json.Bsondirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Loggingdirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consoledirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debugdirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Filedirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Seqdirect
NuGetSIPSorcerydirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Portsdirect
NuGetSystem.Managementdirect
NuGetMaterialDesignThemesindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug9.0.18indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controlsindirect
NuGetSerilogindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.