Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 22:47 UTC
ruvnet / RuView
π RuView turns commodity WiFi signals into real-time spatial intelligence, vital sign monitoring, and presence detection — all without a single pixel of video.
ruvnet/RuView holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
89
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
rUvPersonal account
10,809 followers199 public repossince Nov 2012Not a Bot
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | wifi-densepose | 1.99.0 | 10,856 | 5 | 72 days ago | wificsipose-estimationdeprecatedmigration |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
89
Development activity
81Excellent
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 16.6/36 | Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 1,194 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 1,194 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 24 |
Release discipline
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 100 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 2 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 100 |
| latest_release_tag | v2146 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 2 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 0.2 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
74
Popularity & adoption
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 60/60 | Stars — 88,499 stars |
| 25/25 | Forks — 11,762 forks |
| 15/15 | Watchers — 770 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 11,762 |
| stars | 88,499 |
| watchers | 770 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 15 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
How it's scored
| 53.8/80 | Monthly downloads — 10,856 downloads/month across pypi |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | wifi-densepose |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 10,856 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
65
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 3/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 29 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 29 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.865 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
63Moderate
How it's scored
| 38.3/42 | Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed |
| 20.8/30 | PR acceptance — 393/566 decided PRs merged |
| 3.5/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 393 |
| open_issues | 39 |
| closed_issues | 404 |
| prs_merged_7d | 13 |
| prs_decided_7d | 17 |
| prs_merged_30d | 37 |
| prs_decided_30d | 45 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.912 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 173 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 8 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 3 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 11 |
Ownership & stewardship
75Good
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 25/25 | Owner reach — 10,809 followers of ruvnet |
| 25/25 | Track record — 199 public repos, account ~13 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 10,809 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | ruvnet |
| public_repos | 199 |
| account_age_days | 4,995 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 72 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 5 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | wifi-densepose |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 72 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
90
Engineering practices
84Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 29 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://Cognitum.One/RuView |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 20 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | densepose, wifi, esp32, monitoring, rf, wifi-security, self-learning, firmware, pose-estimation, spatial-intelligence, home-assistant, home-automation, skills, networking, claude, iot, react, typescript, npm, awesome |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://Cognitum.One/RuView |
| docs_site | https://Cognitum.One/RuView |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
50
Security posture
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 6/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 2.2/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 5/5 | Fuzzing — project is fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 3/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
| 5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 220 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
83
Agent context & guidance
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — .claude/agents/goal/agent.md, .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, harness/homecore/AGENTS.md, harness/homecore/CLAUDE.md, harness/ruview/CLAUDE.md, harness/wifi-densepose-sar/CLAUDE.md, plugins/ruview/codex/AGENTS.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | .claude/agents/goal/agent.md, .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, harness/homecore/AGENTS.md, harness/homecore/CLAUDE.md, harness/ruview/CLAUDE.md, harness/wifi-densepose-sar/CLAUDE.md, plugins/ruview/codex/AGENTS.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 25,097 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
83Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile, firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/Makefile, firmware/esp32-csi-node/tests/host/Makefile, v2/crates/cog-ha-matter/cog/Makefile, v2/crates/cog-pose-estimation/cog/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/frontend/tsconfig.json, harness/wifi-densepose-sar/tsconfig.json, python/wifi_densepose/py.typed, tools/ruview-cli/tsconfig.json, tools/ruview-mcp/tests/tsconfig.json, tools/ruview-mcp/tsconfig.json, ui/mobile/tsconfig.json, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/ui/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 6/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile, firmware/esp32-csi-node/test/Makefile, firmware/esp32-csi-node/tests/host/Makefile, v2/crates/cog-ha-matter/cog/Makefile, v2/crates/cog-pose-estimation/cog/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | dashboard/tsconfig.json, examples/frontend/tsconfig.json, harness/wifi-densepose-sar/tsconfig.json, python/wifi_densepose/py.typed, tools/ruview-cli/tsconfig.json, tools/ruview-mcp/tests/tsconfig.json, tools/ruview-mcp/tsconfig.json, ui/mobile/tsconfig.json, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/ui/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | python/Cargo.toml, v2/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/cog-ha-matter/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/cog-person-count/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/cog-pose-estimation/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-api/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-assist/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-automation/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-hap/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-migrate/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-plugin-example/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-plugins/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-recorder/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore-server/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/homecore/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/nvsim-server/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/nvsim/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/ruview-auth/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/ruview-unified/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-aether/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-bfld/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-calibration/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-cli/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-core/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-desktop/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-engine/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-hardware/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-mat/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-nn/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-occworld-candle/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-pointcloud/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-rufield/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-ruvector/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-sar/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-sensing-server/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-signal/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-train/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-vitals/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-wasm-edge/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-wasm/Cargo.toml, v2/crates/wifi-densepose-wifiscan/Cargo.toml, v2/patches/ruvector-crv/Cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed) |
| 54.5/55 | Manageable file sizes — 13/1,530 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Rust |
| largest_source_bytes | 932,689 |
| source_files_sampled | 1,530 |
| oversized_source_files | 13 |
Machine-readable interfaces
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — demos, examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | demos, examples |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | network-service |
Key facts
88,499GitHub stars
29contributors
1,194commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
39open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch crates package 'wifi-densepose-py' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 11,762 ⇿
0Stars
11,762Forks
42Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 8 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| 3 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | Dangerous-Workflow | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 10 | Fuzzing | project is fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 6 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6 |
| 10 | SAST | SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 220 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 64
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @preact/signals-core | ^1.8.0 | dashboard/package.json |
| npm | lit | ^3.2.1 | dashboard/package.json |
| npm | workbox-window | ^7.4.0 | dashboard/package.json |
| PyPI | fastapi | >=0.104.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | uvicorn | >=0.24.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pydantic | >=2.5.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pydantic-settings | >=2.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | sqlalchemy | >=2.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | alembic | >=1.13.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | asyncpg | >=0.29.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | psycopg2-binary | >=2.9.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | redis | >=5.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | aioredis | >=2.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | torch | >=2.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | torchvision | >=0.16.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | numpy | >=1.24.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | opencv-python | >=4.8.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pillow | >=10.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | scikit-learn | >=1.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | scipy | >=1.11.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | matplotlib | >=3.7.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pandas | >=2.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | scapy | >=2.5.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyserial | >=3.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | paramiko | >=3.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | click | >=8.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | rich | >=13.6.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | typer | >=0.9.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-multipart | >=0.0.6 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-jose | >=3.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | passlib | >=1.7.4 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-dotenv | >=1.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyyaml | >=6.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | toml | >=0.10.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | prometheus-client | >=0.19.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | structlog | >=23.2.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | psutil | >=5.9.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx | >=0.25.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | aiofiles | >=23.2.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | marshmallow | >=3.20.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | jsonschema | >=4.19.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | celery | >=5.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | kombu | >=5.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest | >=7.4.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-asyncio | >=0.21.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-cov | >=4.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-mock | >=3.12.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-xdist | >=3.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-bdd | >=7.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | black | >=23.9.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | isort | >=5.12.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | flake8 | >=6.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | mypy | >=1.6.0 | pyproject.toml |
| crates.io | pyo3 | 0.22 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-core | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-vitals | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-bfld | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | numpy | 0.22 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-aether | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-train | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-signal | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | wifi-densepose-mat | 0.3.0 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1.35 | python/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | geo | 0.27 | python/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.