Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-04 10:10 UTC

ruvnet / agentic-flow

Easily switch between alternative low-cost AI models in Claude Code/Agent SDK. For those comfortable using Claude agents and commands, it lets you take what you've created and deploy fully hosted agents for real business purposes. Use Claude Code to get the agent working, then deploy it in your favorite cloud.

TypeScript · JavaScript · RustNo license detected★ 799 stars⑂ 175 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceMCP serverCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

ruvnet/agentic-flow holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (93/100) and lowest on Security (32/100). It was last updated 36 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rUvPersonal account
11,280 followers214 public repossince Nov 2012Not a Bot

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 36 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume813 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year813
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push36
active_weeks_last_year24
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 283 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv2.3.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release283
mean_days_between_releases1.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
47.1/60Stars799 stars
18.7/25Forks175 forks
6/15Watchers13 watchers
Inputs used
forks175
stars799
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
73.5/80Monthly downloads323,684 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesagentic-flow
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads323,684
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 93% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.932
How it's scored
10.7/42Issue resolution25% of issues closed
20.7/30PR acceptance40/58 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs40
open_issues106
closed_issues36
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.254
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach11,280 followers of ruvnet
25/25Track record214 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers11,280
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginruvnet
public_repos214
account_age_days5,025
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history200 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesagentic-flow
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://ruv.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagents, claude, claude-agent-sdk, claude-code, gemini, openrouter, swarm-intelligence
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ruv.io
docs_sitehttps://ruv.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
manifestsagentic-flow/package.json, analysis/package.json, analysis/requirements.txt, bench/package.json, benchmarks/package.json, package.json, reasoningbank/Cargo.toml, tests/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
How it's scored
14.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: sharp 0.34.5 (high 7.3)
6.9/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: @opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger 2.7.1 (high 7.5), adm-zip 0.5.18 (high 7.5), @opentelemetry/core 1.30.1 (moderate 5.3), +1 more
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages5
assessed_packages584
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the npm:agentic-flow@2.1.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 584 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.claude/agents/goal/agent.md, .claude/agents/reasoning/agent.md, .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, CLAUDE.md, agentic-flow/.claude/agents/goal/agent.md, agentic-flow/.claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, agentic-flow/docs/CLAUDE.md, docs/configuration/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.claude/agents/goal/agent.md, .claude/agents/reasoning/agent.md, .claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, CLAUDE.md, agentic-flow/.claude/agents/goal/agent.md, agentic-flow/.claude/commands/monitoring/agents.md, agentic-flow/docs/CLAUDE.md, docs/configuration/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes25,466
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapsrc/controller/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checkingagentic-flow/config/tsconfig.json, agentic-flow/tests/tsconfig.json, bench/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/tsconfig.json, examples/nova-medicina/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-booster/tsconfig.json, packages/agentdb-onnx/tsconfig.json, src/controller/test/e2e/tsconfig.json, src/utils/tsconfig.json, test/benchmark/tsconfig.json, test/e2b/tsconfig.json, test/economics/tsconfig.json, test/patterns/tsconfig.json, tests/e2b-specialized-agents/tsconfig.json, tests/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessrc/controller/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsagentic-flow/config/tsconfig.json, agentic-flow/tests/tsconfig.json, bench/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/tsconfig.json, examples/nova-medicina/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-booster/tsconfig.json, packages/agentdb-onnx/tsconfig.json, src/controller/test/e2e/tsconfig.json, src/utils/tsconfig.json, test/benchmark/tsconfig.json, test/e2b/tsconfig.json, test/economics/tsconfig.json, test/patterns/tsconfig.json, tests/e2b-specialized-agents/tsconfig.json, tests/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsagentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/alignment-engine/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/api-service/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/data-models/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/immune-analyzer/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/offtarget-predictor/Cargo.toml, agentic-flow/examples/crispr-cas13-pipeline/crates/processing-orchestrator/Cargo.toml, crates/agentic-flow-quic/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-api/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-cli/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-core/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-data/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-models/Cargo.toml, examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-physics/Cargo.toml, examples/rights-preserving-platform/Cargo.toml, packages/agent-booster/Cargo.toml, packages/agent-booster/crates/agent-booster-native/Cargo.toml, packages/agent-booster/crates/agent-booster-wasm/Cargo.toml, packages/agent-booster/crates/agent-booster/Cargo.toml, packages/agentic-jujutsu/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-core/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-learning/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-mcp/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-network/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-storage/Cargo.toml, reasoningbank/crates/reasoningbank-wasm/Cargo.toml, src/controller/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes2/1,174 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes71,745
source_files_sampled1,174
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)examples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-api/openapi.yaml, examples/climate-prediction/docs/openapi.yaml
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesexamples/climate-prediction/crates/climate-api/openapi.yaml, examples/climate-prediction/docs/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

799GitHub stars
3contributors
813commits, last 12 months
36days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
106open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@agentic-flow/reasoningbank-benchmark' from its registry
  • npm package 'analysis' points at a different repository (https://github.com/seikho/analysis); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (killed by SIGKILL — most likely the container's memory limit; 2026/09/04 10:09:56 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 175 ⇿
0Stars
175Forks
24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04080120160200173112024-092025-092026-08
Major 1Minor 5Patch 16

Each point covers 2 days.

Direct dependencies 67
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk^0.1.5agentic-flow/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.65.0agentic-flow/package.json
npm@google/genai^1.22.0agentic-flow/package.json
npm@metaharness/router^0.3.2agentic-flow/package.json
npm@ruvector/core^0.1.29agentic-flow/package.json
npm@ruvector/edge-full^0.1.0agentic-flow/package.json
npm@ruvector/router^0.1.30agentic-flow/package.json
npm@ruvector/ruvllm^2.5.5agentic-flow/package.json
npm@ruvector/tiny-dancer^0.1.17agentic-flow/package.json
npm@supabase/supabase-js^2.78.0agentic-flow/package.json
npm@huggingface/transformers^3.8.1agentic-flow/package.json
npmagentdb3.0.0-alpha.20agentic-flow/package.json
npmaxios^1.12.2agentic-flow/package.json
npmdotenv^16.4.5agentic-flow/package.json
npmexpress^5.1.0agentic-flow/package.json
npmfastmcp^3.19.0agentic-flow/package.json
npmglob^13.0.0agentic-flow/package.json
npmgun^0.2020.1241agentic-flow/package.json
npmhttp-proxy-middleware^3.0.5agentic-flow/package.json
npmruvector0.2.40agentic-flow/package.json
npmruvector-onnx-embeddings-wasm^0.1.2agentic-flow/package.json
npmtiktoken^1.0.22agentic-flow/package.json
npmulid^3.0.1agentic-flow/package.json
npmws^8.20.0agentic-flow/package.json
npmyaml^2.8.1agentic-flow/package.json
npmzod^3.25.76agentic-flow/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.32.1bench/package.json
npmbetter-sqlite3^11.7.0bench/package.json
npmulid^2.3.0bench/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk^0.1.5package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-code^2.1.150package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.65.0package.json
npm@google/genai^1.22.0package.json
npm@ruvector/attention^0.1.2package.json
npm@ruvector/core^0.1.31package.json
npm@ruvector/gnn^0.1.23package.json
npm@ruvector/ruvllm^2.5.3package.json
npm@ruvector/sona^0.1.3package.json
npm@supabase/supabase-js^2.78.0package.json
npm@types/react^19.2.2package.json
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.2package.json
npm@vitejs/plugin-react-swc^4.2.0package.json
npm@xenova/transformers^2.17.2package.json
npmagentdb^3.0.0-alpha.14package.json
npmagentic-payments^0.1.13package.json
npmautoprefixer^10.4.21package.json
npmaxios^1.16.1package.json
npmbetter-sqlite3^11.10.0package.json
npmdotenv^16.4.5package.json
npmexpress^5.1.0package.json
npmfastmcp^3.19.0package.json
npmhttp-proxy-middleware^3.0.5package.json
npmlucide-react^0.548.0package.json
npmmarked^17.0.3package.json
npmpostcss^8.5.15package.json
npmreact^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.15.1package.json
npmruvector^0.2.18package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.1.16package.json
npmtailwindcss-animate^1.0.7package.json
npmtiktoken^1.0.22package.json
npmulid^3.0.1package.json
npmvite^8.0.14package.json
npmws^8.21.0package.json
npmyaml^2.9.0package.json
npmzod^3.25.76package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 5

Installing npm:agentic-flow@2.1.2 pulls in 584 packages, direct and transitive: 5 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sharp0.34.5directhigh10.35.0
@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger2.7.1indirecthigh12.9.0
adm-zip0.5.18indirecthigh10.6.0
@opentelemetry/core1.30.1indirectmoderate12.8.0
@opentelemetry/core2.7.1indirectmoderate12.8.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.