Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 08:27 UTC

ruvnet / metaharness

🛠️ The meta-harness for AI agents — scaffold your own focused, branded agent harness with its own npx CLI, MCP server, memory, learning loop, and witness-signed releases. Works with Claude Code, Codex, pi.dev, Hermes, OpenClaw, and RVM (hardware-isolated sandbox).

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 650 stars⑂ 79 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolWeb interfaceMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

ruvnet/metaharness holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (87/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

rUvPersonal account
11,407 followers218 public repossince Nov 2012Not a Bot

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@metaharness/codexpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.021190 days agometaharnessagent-harnessagent-harness-generatorcodexhostai-agentmcpnpxscaffold
npm@metaharness/codingpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.020190 days agometaharnessagent-harnessagent-harness-generatorcodingverticalclaude-codeai-agentmcpnpxscaffold
npm@metaharness/devopspoints to another repo — not scored0.1.1284290 days agometaharnessagent-harnessagent-harness-generatordevopsverticalclaude-codeai-agentmcpnpxscaffold

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 973 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year973
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 3 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 33 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv0.4.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases28.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.6/60Stars — 650 stars
15.8/25Forks — 79 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks79
stars650
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges24
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.937
How it's scored
13.8/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance — 163/175 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs163
open_issues80
closed_issues39
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d43
prs_decided_30d47
issue_closed_ratio0.328
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach — 11,407 followers of ruvnet
25/25Track record — 218 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers11,407
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginruvnet
public_repos218
account_age_days5,034
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://Cognitum.One
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent-harness, agent-scaffolding, agentic-ai, agentic-framework, autonomous-agents, claude-code, codex, hermes-agent, mcp, mcp-server, multi-agent, openai-codex, pi-dev, scaffold, scaffolding, agent-harness-generator, create-agent-harness, openclaw, rvm, sandboxing
has_wikino
homepagehttps://Cognitum.One
docs_sitehttps://Cognitum.One
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — kimi-k3-harness/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://code.claude.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://code.claude.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_fileskimi-k3-harness/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,497
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml, crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — apps/web-ui/tsconfig.json, kimi-k3-harness/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-harness-generator-lib/tsconfig.json, packages/agntcy/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3-bench/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3-chatgpt/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3/tsconfig.json, packages/autogenous/tsconfig.json, packages/avo/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-finops/tsconfig.json, packages/bench/tsconfig.json, packages/create-agent-harness/tsconfig.json, packages/darwin-mode/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-extract/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-hle/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-math/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-servedmodel/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-sql/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-toolcall/tsconfig.json, packages/field-memory/tsconfig.json, packages/flywheel/tsconfig.json, packages/harness/tsconfig.json, packages/horizon/tsconfig.json, packages/host-claude-code/tsconfig.json, packages/host-codex/tsconfig.json, packages/host-copilot/tsconfig.json, packages/host-github-actions/tsconfig.json, packages/host-hermes/tsconfig.json, packages/host-openclaw/tsconfig.json, packages/host-opencode/tsconfig.json, packages/host-pi-dev/tsconfig.json, packages/host-prime-agent/tsconfig.json, packages/host-rvm/tsconfig.json, packages/jujutsu/tsconfig.json, packages/kernel-js/tsconfig.json, packages/oo-agents/tsconfig.json, packages/projects/tsconfig.json, packages/radio/tsconfig.json, packages/redblue/tsconfig.json, packages/router/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/turn-credit/tsconfig.json, packages/vertical-base/tsconfig.json, packages/vertical-trading/tsconfig.json, packages/weight-eft/tsconfig.json, packages/workspace-lens/tsconfig.json, packages/workspace-probe/tsconfig.json, services/apicompletions/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 22 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsapps/web-ui/tsconfig.json, kimi-k3-harness/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-harness-generator-lib/tsconfig.json, packages/agntcy/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3-bench/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3-chatgpt/tsconfig.json, packages/arc-agi-3/tsconfig.json, packages/autogenous/tsconfig.json, packages/avo/tsconfig.json, packages/aws-finops/tsconfig.json, packages/bench/tsconfig.json, packages/create-agent-harness/tsconfig.json, packages/darwin-mode/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-extract/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-hle/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-math/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-servedmodel/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-sql/tsconfig.json, packages/evals-toolcall/tsconfig.json, packages/field-memory/tsconfig.json, packages/flywheel/tsconfig.json, packages/harness/tsconfig.json, packages/horizon/tsconfig.json, packages/host-claude-code/tsconfig.json, packages/host-codex/tsconfig.json, packages/host-copilot/tsconfig.json, packages/host-github-actions/tsconfig.json, packages/host-hermes/tsconfig.json, packages/host-openclaw/tsconfig.json, packages/host-opencode/tsconfig.json, packages/host-pi-dev/tsconfig.json, packages/host-prime-agent/tsconfig.json, packages/host-rvm/tsconfig.json, packages/jujutsu/tsconfig.json, packages/kernel-js/tsconfig.json, packages/oo-agents/tsconfig.json, packages/projects/tsconfig.json, packages/radio/tsconfig.json, packages/redblue/tsconfig.json, packages/router/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/tsconfig.json, packages/turn-credit/tsconfig.json, packages/vertical-base/tsconfig.json, packages/vertical-trading/tsconfig.json, packages/weight-eft/tsconfig.json, packages/workspace-lens/tsconfig.json, packages/workspace-probe/tsconfig.json, services/apicompletions/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.22
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml, crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml, crates/kernel/Cargo.toml, crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml, crates/template-catalog/Cargo.toml, kimi-k3-harness/crates/k3-kernel-bench/Cargo.toml, kimi-k3-harness/crates/k3rs/Cargo.toml, packages/horizon/crate/Cargo.toml, packages/oo-agents/crate/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,297 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes72,071
source_files_sampled1,297
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

650GitHub stars
7contributors
973commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
80open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'kimi-k3-harness' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ruflo-kernel' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ruflo-kernel-napi' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ruflo-kernel-wasm' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'poker-darwin' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'template-catalog' from its registry
  • npm package '@metaharness/codex' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ruvnet/agent-harness-generator); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@metaharness/coding' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ruvnet/agent-harness-generator); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@metaharness/devops' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ruvnet/agent-harness-generator); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 79 ⇿
0Stars
79Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060807852026-062026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 2
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 08:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@metaharness/kernel^0.1.0kimi-k3-harness/package.json
npm@metaharness/host-claude-code^0.1.0kimi-k3-harness/package.json
npm@metaharness/flywheel^0.1.0kimi-k3-harness/package.json
npm@huggingface/transformers^4.2.0apps/web-ui/package.json
npmjszip^3.10.1apps/web-ui/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.456.0apps/web-ui/package.json
npmreact^18.3.1apps/web-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.3.1apps/web-ui/package.json
crates.ioruflo-kernel—crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml
crates.ionapi—crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml
crates.ionapi-derive—crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/kernel-napi/Cargo.toml
crates.ioruflo-kernel—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys—crates/kernel-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek2.1crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4crates/kernel/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioruvector-core0.1.31crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.iocandle-core0.8crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.iocandle-nn0.8crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.iors_poker5crates/poker-darwin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—crates/template-catalog/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—crates/template-catalog/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.