Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-24 07:44 UTC

sachitrafa / YourMemory

Agentic AI memory with Ebbinghaus forgetting curve decay. +16pp better recall than Mem0 on LoCoMo.

Python · HTML · JavaScriptCustom license★ 260 stars⑂ 21 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ai-agents#claude#ebbinghaus#llm-memory#mcp#memory#model-context-protocol#pgvector#agent-memory#devtools#mcp-server#persistent-memory#rag

sachitrafa/YourMemory holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sachit.MishraPersonal account
7 followers8 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIyourmemory1.4.86-990 days agomcpclaudememoryebbinghausaisqlitepostgresql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 308 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year308
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 59 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv1.4.26
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases18.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

50Moderate
How it's scored
39.1/60Stars — 260 stars
10.8/25Forks — 21 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks21
stars260
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.997

Issue & PR responsiveness

55Moderate
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
16/30PR acceptance — 8/15 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues1
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of sachitrafa
18.9/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsachitrafa
public_repos8
account_age_days2,606
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 99 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesyourmemory
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://yourmemoryai.xyz/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, claude, ebbinghaus, llm-memory, mcp, memory, model-context-protocol, pgvector, agent-memory, devtools, mcp-server, persistent-memory, rag
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://yourmemoryai.xyz/
docs_sitehttps://yourmemoryai.xyz/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories13
affected_packages4
assessed_packages106
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 106 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes724

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — cloudflare-worker/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 48 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configscloudflare-worker/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.48
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (cloudflare-worker/tsconfig.json)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 1/82 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes78,963
source_files_sampled82
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

260GitHub stars
2contributors
308commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:yourmemory@1.4.86; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 21 ⇿
0Stars
21Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242152026-032026-052026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 3
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-24 07:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpython-dotenv—pyproject.toml
PyPImcp—pyproject.toml
PyPIsentence-transformers—pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil—pyproject.toml
PyPIduckdb>=0.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIapscheduler—pyproject.toml
PyPIspacy>=3.8.13,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPInetworkx>=3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi—pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn—pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx—pyproject.toml
All dependencies 122

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 110 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIapscheduler—direct
PyPIduckdb—direct
PyPIfastapi—direct
PyPIhttpx—direct
PyPImcp—direct
PyPInetworkx—direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPIpython-dateutil—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIsentence-transformers—direct
PyPIspacy—direct
PyPIuvicorn—direct
npm@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler0.3.4indirect
npm@cloudflare/unenv-preset2.0.2indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20250718.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20250718.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20250718.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20250718.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20250718.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/workers-types4.20260611.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.0indirect
npm@esbuild-plugins/node-globals-polyfill0.2.3indirect
npm@esbuild-plugins/node-modules-polyfill0.2.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.17.19indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.17.19indirect
npm@fastify/busboy2.1.1indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.0.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.0.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.33.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.33.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npmacorn8.14.0indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.2indirect
npmas-table1.0.55indirect
npmblake3-wasm2.1.5indirect
npmcolor4.2.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolor-string1.9.1indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer2.0.2indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmesbuild0.17.19indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmestree-walker0.6.1indirect
npmexit-hook2.2.1indirect
npmexsolve1.0.8indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-source2.0.12indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmis-arrayish0.3.4indirect
npmmagic-string0.25.9indirect
npmmime3.0.0indirect
npmminiflare3.20250718.3indirect
npmmustache4.2.0indirect
npmohash2.0.11indirect
npmpath-to-regexp6.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmprintable-characters1.0.42indirect
npmrollup-plugin-inject3.0.2indirect
npmrollup-plugin-node-polyfills0.2.1indirect
npmrollup-pluginutils2.8.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmsharp0.33.5indirect
npmsimple-swizzle0.2.4indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsourcemap-codec1.4.8indirect
npmstacktracey2.2.0indirect
npmstoppable1.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmufo1.6.4indirect
npmundici5.29.0indirect
npmunenv2.0.0-rc.14indirect
npmworkerd1.20250718.0indirect
npmwrangler3.114.17indirect
npmws8.18.0indirect
npmyouch3.3.4indirect
npmzod3.22.3indirect
PyPIneo4j—indirect
PyPIpgvector—indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 106 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sharp0.33.5indirecthigh10.35.0
undici5.29.0indirecthigh98.5.0
ws8.18.0indirecthigh28.21.0
esbuild0.17.19indirectmoderate10.25.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sachitrafa/YourMemory. Read them side by side →

95MemTensor/MemOSSelf-evolving memory OS for LLM & AI Agents: ultra-persistent memory, hybrid-retrieval, and cross-task skill reuse, with 35.24% token savings and DeepSeek Harness support.Exceptional96alpic-ai/skybridgeSkybridge is a full-stack TypeScript framework for MCP Apps and ChatGPT Apps. Type-safe. React-powered. Platform-agnostic.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional98mem0ai/mem0Universal memory layer for AI AgentsExceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.