Manipulate JSON-like data with NumPy-like idioms.
scikit-hep/awkward holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | awkward_cpp | 54 | 862,502 | 85 | 18 days ago |
| PyPI | awkward | 2.11.0 | - | 207 | 0 days ago |
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 33.9/36 | Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 305 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data |
| commits_last_year | 305 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 49 |
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 100 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 0 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~38.5 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
| releases_count | 100 |
| latest_release_tag | v2.11.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 0 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 38.5 |
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
| 48.4/60 | Stars — 970 stars |
| 17.6/25 | Forks — 131 forks |
| 6.4/15 | Watchers — 15 watchers |
| forks | 131 |
| stars | 970 |
| watchers | 15 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
| 79.1/80 | Monthly downloads — 862,502 downloads/month across pypi |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
| packages | awkward_cpp, awkward |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 862,502 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 14.6/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 62 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data |
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 62 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.35 |
| 36.2/42 | Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed |
| 26.8/30 | PR acceptance — 2,296/2,567 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data |
| merged_prs | 2,296 |
| open_issues | 175 |
| closed_issues | 1,105 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.863 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 271 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 17.9/25 | Owner reach — 304 followers of scikit-hep |
| 24.7/25 | Track record — 54 public repos, account ~9 yr old |
| followers | 304 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | scikit-hep |
| public_repos | 54 |
| account_age_days | 3,535 |
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 207 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
| packages | awkward_cpp, awkward |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 0 |
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 19 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config |
| 9.6/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | yes |
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://awkward-array.org |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 13 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
| topics | json, numpy, data-analysis, jagged-array, ragged-array, columnar-format, pandas, numba, apache-arrow, cern-root, scikit-hep, python, rdataframe |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://awkward-array.org |
| docs_site | https://awkward-array.org |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
| 0/30 | Security policy (SECURITY.md) |
| 25/25 | Dependabot config |
| 0/25 | Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected |
| 0/20 | CodeQL workflow |
| source | file_signals |
| lockfiles | — |
| manifests | awkward-cpp/pyproject.toml, docs/requirements-wasm.txt, docs/requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, requirements-test-basic.txt, requirements-test-full.txt, requirements-test-gpu.txt, requirements-test-minimal.txt, requirements-test-ml.txt, requirements-test-nogil.txt, requirements-test-numpy1.txt |
| has_codeql_workflow | no |
| has_security_policy | no |
| has_dependabot_config | yes |
| 20.2/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: numpy 1.21.3 (moderate 5.3) |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 35.3/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,675 days ago |
| source | osv |
| advisories | 3 |
| affected_packages | 2 |
| assessed_packages | 9 |
| unassessed_packages | 47 |
| affected_by_severity | high 1, moderate 1 |
| direct_affected_packages | 1 |
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 7,138 |
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — noxfile.py |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | noxfile.py |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config |
| 53.9/55 | Manageable file sizes — 26/1,275 source files over 60KB |
| primary_language | Python |
| largest_source_bytes | 216,054 |
| source_files_sampled | 1,275 |
| oversized_source_files | 26 |
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples, notebooks, samples |
| example_dirs | examples, notebooks, samples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | numpy | >=1.21.3 | awkward-cpp/pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | awkward_cpp | ==54 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | importlib_metadata | >=4.13.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | numpy | >=1.21.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | packaging | — | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | typing_extensions | >=4.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | fsspec | >=2022.11.0 | pyproject.toml |
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | awkward-cpp | 54 | direct |
| PyPI | fsspec | — | direct |
| PyPI | importlib-metadata | — | direct |
| PyPI | numpy | — | direct |
| PyPI | numpy | 1.21.3 | direct |
| PyPI | packaging | — | direct |
| PyPI | typing-extensions | — | direct |
| PyPI | awkward | — | indirect |
| PyPI | black | — | indirect |
| PyPI | fsspec-xrootd | — | indirect |
| PyPI | h5py | — | indirect |
| PyPI | hatchling | — | indirect |
| PyPI | hepunits | — | indirect |
| PyPI | hist | — | indirect |
| PyPI | hypothesis-awkward | 0.19.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | ipyleaflet | — | indirect |
| PyPI | jax | — | indirect |
| PyPI | jupyterlite | 0.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | jupyterlite-pyodide-kernel | 0.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | jupyterlite-sphinx | 0.8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | lark-parser | — | indirect |
| PyPI | matplotlib | — | indirect |
| PyPI | myst-nb | — | indirect |
| PyPI | myst-parser | — | indirect |
| PyPI | numba | — | indirect |
| PyPI | numba-cuda | — | indirect |
| PyPI | numexpr | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pandas | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pandas | 1.3.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | particle | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pyarrow | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pyarrow | 17.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pybind11 | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pycparser | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pydantic | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pydata-sphinx-theme | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pyodide-build | 0.23.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-cov | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-xdist | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pyyaml | — | indirect |
| PyPI | s3fs | — | indirect |
| PyPI | safetensors | — | indirect |
| PyPI | scikit-build-core | — | indirect |
| PyPI | scikit-hep-testdata | — | indirect |
| PyPI | scipy | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-autoapi | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-copybutton | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-design | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-external-toc | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-sitemap | — | indirect |
| PyPI | tensorflow | — | indirect |
| PyPI | torch | — | indirect |
| PyPI | uproot | — | indirect |
| PyPI | vector | — | indirect |
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 9 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 47 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pyarrow | 17.0.0 | indirect | high | 2 | 23.0.1 |
| numpy | 1.21.3 | direct | moderate | 1 | 1.22 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.