Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 22:53 UTC

scikit-hep / awkward

Manipulate JSON-like data with NumPy-like idioms.

Python · C++BSD-3-Clause★ 970 stars⑂ 131 forkssince Aug 2019View on GitHub ↗

scikit-hep/awkward holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Scikit-HEP ProjectOrganization
304 followers54 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIawkward_cpp54862,5028518 days ago
PyPIawkward2.11.0-2070 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume305 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year305
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases38.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.4/60Stars970 stars
17.6/25Forks131 forks
6.4/15Watchers15 watchers
Inputs used
forks131
stars970
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
79.1/80Monthly downloads862,502 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesawkward_cpp, awkward
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads862,502
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth62 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled62
top_contributor_share0.35
How it's scored
36.2/42Issue resolution86% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance2,296/2,567 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs2,296
open_issues175
closed_issues1,105
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.863
closed_unmerged_prs271
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
17.9/25Owner reach304 followers of scikit-hep
24.7/25Track record54 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers304
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginscikit-hep
public_repos54
account_age_days3,535
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history207 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesawkward_cpp, awkward
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows19 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://awkward-array.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjson, numpy, data-analysis, jagged-array, ragged-array, columnar-format, pandas, numba, apache-arrow, cern-root, scikit-hep, python, rdataframe
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://awkward-array.org
docs_sitehttps://awkward-array.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifestsawkward-cpp/pyproject.toml, docs/requirements-wasm.txt, docs/requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, requirements-test-basic.txt, requirements-test-full.txt, requirements-test-gpu.txt, requirements-test-minimal.txt, requirements-test-ml.txt, requirements-test-nogil.txt, requirements-test-numpy1.txt
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
20.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: numpy 1.21.3 (moderate 5.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
35.3/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,675 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages47
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 9 resolved dependencies against OSV. 47 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,138
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapnoxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnoxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
53.9/55Manageable file sizes26/1,275 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes216,054
source_files_sampled1,275
oversized_source_files26
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

970GitHub stars
62contributors
305commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
175open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index pypi:awkward@2.11.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (2026/07/20 22:53:08 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy>=1.21.3awkward-cpp/pyproject.toml
PyPIawkward_cpp==54pyproject.toml
PyPIimportlib_metadata>=4.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.21.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpackagingpyproject.toml
PyPItyping_extensions>=4.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfsspec>=2022.11.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 56

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIawkward-cpp54direct
PyPIfsspecdirect
PyPIimportlib-metadatadirect
PyPInumpydirect
PyPInumpy1.21.3direct
PyPIpackagingdirect
PyPItyping-extensionsdirect
PyPIawkwardindirect
PyPIblackindirect
PyPIfsspec-xrootdindirect
PyPIh5pyindirect
PyPIhatchlingindirect
PyPIhepunitsindirect
PyPIhistindirect
PyPIhypothesis-awkward0.19.0indirect
PyPIipyleafletindirect
PyPIjaxindirect
PyPIjupyterlite0.1.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlite-pyodide-kernel0.1.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlite-sphinx0.8.0indirect
PyPIlark-parserindirect
PyPImatplotlibindirect
PyPImyst-nbindirect
PyPImyst-parserindirect
PyPInumbaindirect
PyPInumba-cudaindirect
PyPInumexprindirect
PyPIpandasindirect
PyPIpandas1.3.4indirect
PyPIparticleindirect
PyPIpyarrowindirect
PyPIpyarrow17.0.0indirect
PyPIpybind11indirect
PyPIpycparserindirect
PyPIpydanticindirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-themeindirect
PyPIpyodide-build0.23.3indirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-xdistindirect
PyPIpyyamlindirect
PyPIs3fsindirect
PyPIsafetensorsindirect
PyPIscikit-build-coreindirect
PyPIscikit-hep-testdataindirect
PyPIscipyindirect
PyPIsphinxindirect
PyPIsphinx-autoapiindirect
PyPIsphinx-copybuttonindirect
PyPIsphinx-designindirect
PyPIsphinx-external-tocindirect
PyPIsphinx-sitemapindirect
PyPItensorflowindirect
PyPItorchindirect
PyPIuprootindirect
PyPIvectorindirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 9 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 47 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pyarrow17.0.0indirecthigh223.0.1
numpy1.21.3directmoderate11.22

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.