Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 12:59 UTC

sdaqo / anipy-cli

Little tool in python to watch and download anime from the terminal (the better way to watch anime). Also applicable as an API

PythonGPL-3.0★ 486 stars⑂ 72 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#anime#anime-scraper#cli#scraper#gogoanime#python#python3#beautifulsoup#requests-library-python#watch#gplv3

sdaqo/anipy-cli holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (28/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sdaqoPersonal account
30 followers32 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIanipy-api3.8.1719,041710 days agoanimeapi
PyPIanipy-cli3.8.174,5011650 days agoanimecli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume — 68 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year68
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 71 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count71
latest_release_tagv3.8.17
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good
How it's scored
43.6/60Stars — 486 stars
15.4/25Forks — 72 forks
5.6/15Watchers — 11 watchers
Inputs used
forks72
stars486
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

73Good
How it's scored
58.3/80Monthly downloads — 23,542 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesanipy-api, anipy-cli
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads23,542
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.808

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
41.4/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24.8/30PR acceptance — 86/104 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs86
open_issues3
closed_issues213
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.986
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

55Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.7/25Owner reach — 30 followers of sdaqo
23.1/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginsdaqo
public_repos32
account_age_days2,283
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 165 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesanipy-api, anipy-cli
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sdaqo.github.io/anipy-cli
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsanime, anime-scraper, cli, scraper, gogoanime, python, python3, beautifulsoup, requests-library-python, watch, gplv3
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sdaqo.github.io/anipy-cli
docs_sitehttps://sdaqo.github.io/anipy-cli
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

28At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

12Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json, poetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/55 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes24,627
source_files_sampled55
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

486GitHub stars
23contributors
68commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
71releases
1bus factor
3open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 12:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 5/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpython-ffmpeg^2.0.11api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpycryptodomex^3.20.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests^2.32.5api/pyproject.toml
PyPIm3u8^4.1.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4^4.12.3api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-mpv^1.0.6api/pyproject.toml
PyPIdataclasses-json^0.6.7api/pyproject.toml
PyPIlevenshtein^0.27.3api/pyproject.toml
PyPIsimpleeval^1.0.5api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpycountry^24.6.1api/pyproject.toml
PyPIrapidfuzz^3.14.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3^2.6.0api/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml^6.0.1cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIyaspin^3.0.2cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIinquirerpy^0.3.4cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIappdirs^1.4.4cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIpypresence^4.3.0cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIanipy-api^3.8.17cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIanipy-cli—pyproject.toml
All dependencies 157

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 139 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanipy-api3.8.16direct
PyPIappdirs1.4.4direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3direct
PyPIdataclasses-json0.6.7direct
PyPIinquirerpy0.3.4direct
PyPIlevenshtein0.27.3direct
PyPIm3u84.1.0direct
PyPIpycountry24.6.1direct
PyPIpycryptodomex3.23.0direct
PyPIpypresence4.6.1direct
PyPIpython-ffmpeg2.0.12direct
PyPIpython-mpv1.0.8direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIsimpleeval1.0.7direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIyaspin3.4.0direct
npm@ampproject/remapping2.3.0indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.26.2indirect
npm@babel/compat-data7.26.8indirect
npm@babel/core7.26.10indirect
npm@babel/generator7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-compilation-targets7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.26.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-option7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/parser7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/template7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.27.0indirect
npm@babel/types7.27.0indirect
npm@codemod/matchers1.7.1indirect
npm@codemod/parser1.4.1indirect
npm@codemod/utils1.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.8indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbl4.1.0indirect
npmbrowserslist4.24.4indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001713indirect
npmchownr1.1.4indirect
npmcommander12.1.0indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdecompress-response6.0.0indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.0.3indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.136indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmexpand-template2.0.3indirect
npmfs-constants1.0.0indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.2indirect
npmgithub-from-package0.0.0indirect
npmglobals11.12.0indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmisolated-vm5.0.4indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlru-cache5.1.1indirect
npmmimic-response3.1.0indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmkdirp-classic0.5.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnapi-build-utils2.0.0indirect
npmnode-abi3.74.0indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.19indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprebuild-install7.1.3indirect
npmpump3.0.2indirect
npmrc1.2.8indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.1indirect
npmsimple-concat1.0.1indirect
npmsimple-get4.0.1indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments2.0.1indirect
npmtar-fs2.1.3indirect
npmtar-stream2.2.0indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.1.3indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwebcrack2.15.1indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyallist3.1.1indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-datetime-fromisoformat2.0.3indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffe2.0.2indirect
PyPIgriffecli2.0.2indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.0.2indirect
PyPIidna3.17indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImarshmallow3.26.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-literate-nav0.6.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-section-index0.3.12indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.4indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python1.19.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpastel0.2.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpfzy0.3.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.25.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIproperdocs1.6.7indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.21.3indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIruff0.4.10indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.12.5indirect
PyPItyper0.12.5indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.7.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sdaqo/anipy-cli. Read them side by side →

98apify/crawlee-pythonCrawlee—A web scraping and browser automation library for Python to build reliable crawlers. Extract data for AI, LLMs, RAG, or GPTs. Download HTML, PDF, JPG, PNG, and other files from websites. Works with Parsel, BeautifulSoup, Playwright, and raw HTTP. Both headful and headless mode. With proxy rotation.Exceptional98fastapi/fastapiFastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for productionExceptional97fastapi/typerTyper, build great CLIs. Easy to code. Based on Python type hints.Exceptional99apache/supersetApache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration PlatformExceptional99quantumlib/CirqPython framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.Exceptional99astral-sh/ruffAn extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.