Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-02 04:03 UTC

seanchatmangpt / wasm4pm

WASM4PM: Rust for Process Mining.

TypeScript · Rust · TeXCustom license★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sean ChatmanPersonal account
58 followers321 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iowasm4pm26.9.3014060 days agobpmpetri-netprocess-miningwasmwebassemblyalgorithmsdata-structuresscience
crates.iotps-metrics26.7.14391 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 3,895 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year3,895
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year43

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 5 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~34.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv26.9.30
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases34.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

36Weak
How it's scored
28.8/80Monthly downloads — 144 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswasm4pm, tps-metrics
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads610
monthly_downloads144
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.742

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26.4/30PR acceptance — 579/658 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs579
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d27
prs_decided_7d32
prs_merged_30d30
prs_decided_30d35
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs79
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.7/25Owner reach — 58 followers of seanchatmangpt
19.6/25Track record — 321 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers58
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginseanchatmangpt
public_repos321
account_age_days1,207
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswasm4pm, tps-metrics
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 23 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.cjs, clippy.toml, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm
docs_sitehttps://github.com/seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak
How it's scored
3.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 143 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

90Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

79Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, docs_quarantine/ARCHIVE/CLAUDE.md, examples/GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.3/40Legible commit history — 63 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.643
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, docs_quarantine/ARCHIVE/CLAUDE.md, examples/GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes28,192

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Justfile, Makefile, docs/thesis/oldia/Makefile, docs/thesis/periodic-table-of-reason/Makefile, paper-latex/Makefile, wasm4pm/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.cjs, clippy.toml, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — apps/playground-web/tests/tsconfig.json, apps/playground-web/tsconfig.json, apps/wasm4pm/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/adversarial/tsconfig.json, examples/breeds-ts-consumer/tsconfig.json, examples/interview-assist/tsconfig.json, examples/tsconfig.json, examples/zoe-la/tsconfig.json, lab/tsconfig.json, packages/agents/tsconfig.json, packages/cognition/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json, packages/cognition/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts/tsconfig.json, packages/engine/tsconfig.json, packages/kernel/tsconfig.json, packages/ml/tsconfig.json, packages/noun-verb/tsconfig.json, packages/observability/tsconfig.json, packages/planner/tsconfig.json, packages/supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, playground/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, wasm4pm/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesJustfile, Makefile, docs/thesis/oldia/Makefile, docs/thesis/periodic-table-of-reason/Makefile, paper-latex/Makefile, wasm4pm/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/playground-web/tests/tsconfig.json, apps/playground-web/tsconfig.json, apps/wasm4pm/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/adversarial/tsconfig.json, examples/breeds-ts-consumer/tsconfig.json, examples/interview-assist/tsconfig.json, examples/tsconfig.json, examples/zoe-la/tsconfig.json, lab/tsconfig.json, packages/agents/tsconfig.json, packages/cognition/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json, packages/cognition/tsconfig.json, packages/config/tsconfig.json, packages/contracts/tsconfig.json, packages/engine/tsconfig.json, packages/kernel/tsconfig.json, packages/ml/tsconfig.json, packages/noun-verb/tsconfig.json, packages/observability/tsconfig.json, packages/planner/tsconfig.json, packages/supabase/tsconfig.json, packages/testing/tsconfig.json, playground/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json, wasm4pm/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/bench-tools/Cargo.toml, crates/miniml-core/Cargo.toml, crates/ocpq/Cargo.toml, crates/prolog8/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-bindings-py/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-cmca/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-cognition/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-ex4pm-bindings/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-planner/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-sa2a-actuator/Cargo.toml, crates/wasm4pm-testing/Cargo.toml, docs_quarantine/ARCHIVE/docs/experiments/wasm4pm-prolog-reference/Cargo.toml, examples/breeds-rust-consumer/Cargo.toml, tps-metrics/Cargo.toml, wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 28/3,380 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes642,817
source_files_sampled3,380
oversized_source_files28

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — .github/schemas/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files.github/schemas/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
7contributors
3,895commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@wasm4pm/core' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'wasm4pm-dspy' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:wasm4pm@26.9.30; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-02 04:02 UTC

5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6CI-Tests2 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities143 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 61
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmwasm4pmworkspace:*lab/package.json
npm@oxc-minify/binding-darwin-arm64^0.151.0package.json
npm@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-arm64^0.151.0package.json
npm@oxc-transform/binding-darwin-arm64^0.151.0package.json
npmpathe^2.0.3package.json
npm@wasm4pm/configworkspace:*playground/package.json
npm@wasm4pm/contractsworkspace:*playground/package.json
npm@wasm4pm/engineworkspace:*playground/package.json
npmwasm4pmworkspace:*playground/package.json
npm@wasm4pm/observabilityworkspace:*playground/package.json
npm@wasm4pm/plannerworkspace:*playground/package.json
npm@wasm4pm/testingworkspace:*playground/package.json
crates.iogit2—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
crates.iocolored—tps-metrics/Cargo.toml
PyPIblake3>=0.4wasm4pm-dspy/pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema>=4.0wasm4pm-dspy/pyproject.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futures0.4.42wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.19wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.16.0wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconsole_error_panic_hook0.1wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-hash—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioroxmltree0.21wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquick-xml0.41wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv1.3wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iofastrand2.1.0wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand_distr0.4wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iostatrs0.17wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iobcinr-powl—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake3—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-encoder0.252wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasmparser0.252wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek2.1wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogetrandom0.2wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-cognition—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iominiml—wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowgpu0.19wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iopollster0.3wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogood_lp1.15.3wasm4pm/Cargo.toml
npm@wasm4pm/mlworkspace:*wasm4pm/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm. Read them side by side →

88lindera/linderaA multilingual morphological analysis library.Excellent92ruvnet/RuVectorRuVector provides High Performance, Real-Time decisions and agent memory , Self-Learning Ai, Vector GNN DB built in Rust.Excellent91perspective-dev/perspectiveA data visualization and analytics component, especially well-suited for large and/or streaming datasets.Excellent91security-union/videocall-rsmedia streaming framework and teleconferencing system written in rustExcellent89dfinity/response-verificationClient side response verification for the Internet ComputerExcellent98wasmerio/wasmer🚀 Fast, secure, lightweight containers based on WebAssemblyExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.