Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 09:21 UTC

seanchatmangpt / wasm4pm-compat

Rust · Shell · TeXApache-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm-compat holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (87/100) and lowest on Security (27/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sean ChatmanPersonal account
54 followers266 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iowasm4pm-compat26.8.76,717150 days agoconformanceprocess-miningevidenceevent-logoceldata-structuresscience

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 885 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year885
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
51/80Monthly downloads — 6,717 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageswasm4pm-compat
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads20,150
monthly_downloads6,717
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.998

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance — 16/19 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs16
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.5/25Owner reach — 54 followers of seanchatmangpt
19.3/25Track record — 266 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginseanchatmangpt
public_repos266
account_age_days1,152
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 15 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageswasm4pm-compat
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/wasm4pm-compat
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/wasm4pm-compat
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

27At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, web/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 83 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.838
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, web/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,797

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — python/src/wasm4pm_compat_pydantic/py.typed, wasm4pm-compat-ts/tsconfig.json, wasm4pm-compat-ts/zod_integration/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesJustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/src/wasm4pm_compat_pydantic/py.typed, wasm4pm-compat-ts/tsconfig.json, wasm4pm-compat-ts/zod_integration/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, c8-adversary/Cargo.toml, c8-instruments/Cargo.toml, c8-market/Cargo.toml, c8-receipts/Cargo.toml, c8-time/Cargo.toml, gymact-rs/Cargo.toml, wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml, wasm4pm-compat-ts/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/906 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes74,322
source_files_sampled906
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
885commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'c8-time' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'c8-market' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'gymact-rs' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'wasm4pm-compat-pydantic' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'c8-receipts' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'c8-adversary' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'c8-instruments' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index crates:wasm4pm-compat@26.8.7; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 09:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
9CI-Tests9 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioquick-xml0.41Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31.8.5Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.45Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.23.2Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1Cargo.toml
crates.iorustc-hash2Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-time26.6.9c8-adversary/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-market26.6.9c8-adversary/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-instruments26.6.9c8-adversary/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-time26.6.23c8-instruments/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-market26.6.9c8-instruments/Cargo.toml
crates.ioc8-time26.6.23c8-market/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10c8-receipts/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0c8-receipts/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0c8-receipts/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4c8-receipts/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat—gymact-rs/Cargo.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12,<3python/pyproject.toml
crates.ioclap4wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iolsp-max—wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.10wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat—wasm4pm-compat-lsp/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm4pm-compat—wasm4pm-compat-ts/Cargo.toml
crates.iospecta1.0.5wasm4pm-compat-ts/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228wasm4pm-compat-ts/Cargo.toml
npmzod^4.4.3wasm4pm-compat-ts/package.json
npmnext16.2.9web/package.json
npmreact19.2.4web/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.4web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with seanchatmangpt/wasm4pm-compat. Read them side by side →

87cyberlife-coder/VelesDBThe explainable, local-first memory engine for AI agents. One ~9 MB binary fuses vector + graph + columnar under VelesQL; why() returns the evidence path behind every recall. No cloud, no glue code — runs on server, browser, mobile and desktop.Excellent77cool-japan/scirsSciRS2 - Scientific Computing and AI in Rust., providing SciPy-compatible APIs while leveraging Rust's performance, safety, and concurrency features. Unlike traditional scientific librariesGood84Jij-Inc/ommxOpen standard for mathematical programming interoperability Excellent81Dicklesworthstone/asupersyncAsync runtime for Rust where correctness is structural: region-owned tasks, cancel-correct protocols, capability-gated effects, and deterministic replay testingExcellent80nnethercott/hannoyProduction-ready KV-backed HNSW implementation in Rust using LMDBExcellent77itt-ustutt/num-dualGeneralized (hyper-) dual numbers in rustGood

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.