Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 13:24 UTC

shipmonk-rnd / doctrine-two-phase-migrations

Two phase migrations for Doctrine ORM: before and after deploying new codebase version. Suitable for rolling-update deployments (e.g. in Kubernetes clusters).

PHPNo license detected★ 25 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

shipmonk-rnd/doctrine-two-phase-migrations holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated 39 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ShipMonk R&DOrganization
81 followers27 public repossince Aug 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistshipmonk/doctrine-two-phase-migrations0.7.14,59611157 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 39 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share0.56
days_since_last_push39
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 157 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~86.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tag0.7.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release157
mean_days_between_releases86.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars — 25 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars25
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.8/80Monthly downloads — 4,596 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesshipmonk/doctrine-two-phase-migrations
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads59,757
monthly_downloads4,596
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.738
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 120/143 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs120
open_issues2
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.8/25Owner reach — 81 followers of shipmonk-rnd
20.7/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers81
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginshipmonk-rnd
public_repos27
account_age_days1,853

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 157 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesshipmonk/doctrine-two-phase-migrations
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish157

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsautomation, doctrine, migrations, orm, sql
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages3
assessed_packages81
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 53 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.946
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 44 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.44
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/47 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes28,590
source_files_sampled47
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

25GitHub stars
7contributors
22commits, last 12 months
39days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 13:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests22 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/dbal^4.3.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/orm^3.3.3composer.json
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^5.4.0 || ^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0composer.json
All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 76 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/dbal4.3.0direct
Packagistdoctrine/orm3.5.0direct
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0direct
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2direct
Packagistsymfony/console7.3.1direct
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/collections2.3.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/event-manager2.0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.0.10indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistence4.0.0indirect
Packagisteditorconfig-checker/editorconfig-checker10.7.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize2.50.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/json1.6.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-normalizer4.10.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-pointer3.7.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-printer3.8.1indirect
Packagistergebnis/json-schema-validator4.5.1indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.7.2indirect
Packagistlocalheinz/diff1.3.0indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.46indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.16indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules2.0.10indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.63indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistshipmonk/coding-standard0.2.2indirect
Packagistshipmonk/composer-dependency-analyser1.8.4indirect
Packagistshipmonk/dead-code-detector1.0.0indirect
Packagistshipmonk/phpstan-rules4.3.6indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.28.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/config8.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection8.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler8.0.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.0.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.0.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation8.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel8.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.32.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.32.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.32.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.32.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.32.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.3.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper7.4.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter7.4.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirecthigh14.0.2
symfony/http-kernel8.0.7indirecthigh18.0.12
symfony/http-foundation8.0.7indirectlow18.0.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.