Public record
Software health reportschema 0.32.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-20 05:13 UTC

sillsdev / Mercurial4Chorus

Mercurial version used by Chorus

PythonGPL-2.0★ 1 star⑂ 3 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

sillsdev/Mercurial4Chorus holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (36/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SIL LSDevOrganization
182 followers306 public repossince Oct 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSIL.Chorus.Mercurial7.0.1.58-170 days agonative

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

39Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

36Weak
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

44Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 5 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,071 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~174.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv3.0.3.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,071
mean_days_between_releases174.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
5.6/15Watchers — 11 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars1
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

63Moderate
How it's scored
50.4/80Total downloads — 71,039 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSIL.Chorus.Mercurial
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads71,039
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

48Weak
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.4

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent
How it's scored
35.5/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 18/18 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues2
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.846
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

89Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
16.3/25Owner reach — 182 followers of sillsdev
25/25Track record — 306 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers182
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginsillsdev
public_repos306
account_age_days5,436
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSIL.Chorus.Mercurial
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

54Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 64 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories149
affected_packages30
assessed_packages176
unassessed_packages41
affected_by_severityhigh 14, moderate 13, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 176 resolved dependencies against OSV. 41 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.4/40Legible commit history — 18 of 35 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.514
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/chg/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/fuzz/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/hgsh/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/packaging/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — linux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/cext/py.typed, linux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/thirdparty/attr/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 35
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_fileslinux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/chg/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/fuzz/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/hgsh/Makefile, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/packaging/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configslinux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/cext/py.typed, linux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/thirdparty/attr/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsSIL.Chorus.Mercurial.csproj, linux-x64/Mercurial/contrib/merge-lists/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

78Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (linux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/cext/py.typed, linux-x64/Mercurial/mercurial/thirdparty/attr/py.typed)
51.5/55Manageable file sizes — 35/544 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,909,352
source_files_sampled544
oversized_source_files35

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
5contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
5releases
2bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312020-022021-112023-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-20 05:13 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests1 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 18/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities64 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 217

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 217 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaho-corasick0.7.18indirect
crates.ioanstream0.3.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.1indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.1indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon1.0.1indirect
crates.ioassert_cmd2.0.4indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.1.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.3.3indirect
crates.iobstr0.2.17indirect
crates.iocc1.0.79indirect
crates.ioclap4.3.17indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.3.17indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.3.12indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.5.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.0indirect
crates.ioconsole0.15.0indirect
crates.iodifflib0.4.0indirect
crates.iodoc-comment0.3.3indirect
crates.ioeither1.6.1indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode0.3.6indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.1indirect
crates.ioerrno-dragonfly0.1.2indirect
crates.iofuchsia-cprng0.1.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.11.2indirect
crates.ioheck0.4.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.3.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap1.8.0indirect
crates.ioinsta1.13.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.9indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.3indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.1indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.4.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.147indirect
crates.iolinked-hash-map0.5.4indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.4.3indirect
crates.iomemchr2.4.1indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.18.0indirect
crates.iopredicates2.1.1indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.3indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.5indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.66indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.31indirect
crates.iorand0.4.6indirect
crates.iorand_core0.3.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.4.2indirect
crates.iordrand0.4.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.5.5indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.1.10indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.6.25indirect
crates.ioremove_dir_all0.5.3indirect
crates.iorustix0.38.4indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.9indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.136indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.136indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.79indirect
crates.ioserde_yaml0.8.23indirect
crates.iosimilar2.1.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.10.0indirect
crates.iosyn1.0.87indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.27indirect
crates.iotempdir0.3.7indirect
crates.ioterminal_size0.1.17indirect
crates.iotermtree0.2.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.11indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.2indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.1indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.0indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.48.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.48.0indirect
crates.ioyaml-rust0.4.5indirect
PyPI1-9-—indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIastroid2.5.6indirect
PyPIatomicwrites1.4.0indirect
PyPIattrs21.1.0indirect
PyPIattrs21.2.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt3.2.2indirect
PyPIbleach5.0.0indirect
PyPIbookmarksinstore—indirect
PyPIboto3—indirect
PyPIboto31.22.7indirect
PyPIbotocore1.25.7indirect
PyPIcached-property1.5.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2021.10.8indirect
PyPIcffi1.15.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer2.0.12indirect
PyPIclick7.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.4indirect
PyPIcommonmark0.9.1indirect
PyPIcryptography37.0.2indirect
PyPIdirectory-—indirect
PyPIdocutils—indirect
PyPIdocutils0.16indirect
PyPIdocutils0.17.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.18.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.19indirect
PyPIdotencode—indirect
PyPIdulwich—indirect
PyPIdulwich0.20.46indirect
PyPIexp-sparse—indirect
PyPIfncache—indirect
PyPIfuzzywuzzy—indirect
PyPIfuzzywuzzy0.18.0indirect
PyPIgeneraldelta—indirect
PyPIhypothesis—indirect
PyPIidna3.1indirect
PyPIidna3.2indirect
PyPIidna3.3indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata3.1.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata4.11.3indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata5.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig1.1.1indirect
PyPIisort—indirect
PyPIisort4.3.21indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.2.3indirect
PyPIjeepney0.8.0indirect
PyPIjinja2—indirect
PyPIjinja22.11.2indirect
PyPIjmespath1.0.0indirect
PyPIkeyring—indirect
PyPIkeyring22.3.0indirect
PyPIkeyring23.11.0indirect
PyPIkeyring23.5.0indirect
PyPIlazy-object-proxy1.6.0indirect
PyPImanifestlog-—indirect
PyPImanifestv2—indirect
PyPImarkupsafe1.1.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.6.1indirect
PyPImore-itertools9.0.0indirect
PyPImultidict5.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging21.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIparamiko—indirect
PyPIparamiko2.10.4indirect
PyPIparentdelta—indirect
PyPIpathspec0.8.1indirect
PyPIpersistent-nodemap—indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.8.2indirect
PyPIpluggy0.13.1indirect
PyPIpy1.10.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.21indirect
PyPIpyflakes—indirect
PyPIpyflakes2.3.1indirect
PyPIpygit2—indirect
PyPIpygit21.7.1indirect
PyPIpygments—indirect
PyPIpygments2.12.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.13.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.7.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.9.0indirect
PyPIpylint—indirect
PyPIpylint2.8.2indirect
PyPIpynacl1.5.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing2.4.7indirect
PyPIpypsrp—indirect
PyPIpypsrp0.8.1indirect
PyPIpyspnego0.5.2indirect
PyPIpytest6.2.4indirect
PyPIpytest-vcr—indirect
PyPIpytest-vcr1.0.2indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.8.2indirect
PyPIpython-levenshtein—indirect
PyPIpython-levenshtein0.12.2indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes—indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml5.4.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer35.0indirect
PyPIregex2021.4.4indirect
PyPIrelshared—indirect
PyPIrequests2.27.1indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt0.9.1indirect
PyPIrevlogv1—indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich12.3.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.5.2indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.3.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsetuptools75.8.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm—indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm8.2.0indirect
PyPIshare-safe—indirect
PyPIshared—indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIstatus-—indirect
PyPIstore—indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItreemanifest—indirect
PyPItwine—indirect
PyPItwine4.0.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions3.10.0.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPIurllib31.25.11indirect
PyPIurllib31.26.9indirect
PyPIvcrpy—indirect
PyPIvcrpy4.1.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwheel—indirect
PyPIwheel0.45.1indirect
PyPIwindows-curses—indirect
PyPIwindows-curses2.3.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.12.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.6.3indirect
PyPIzipp3.11.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.4.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.8.0indirect
Dependency advisories 30

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 176 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 30 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 41 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
certifi2021.10.8indirecthigh62024.7.4
click7.1.2indirecthigh18.3.3
cryptography37.0.2indirecthigh24300.0.12
dulwich0.20.46indirecthigh41.2.5
idna3.1indirecthigh43.15
idna3.2indirecthigh43.15
idna3.3indirecthigh43.15
jinja22.11.2indirecthigh103.1.6
pygments2.7.1indirecthigh82.20.0
setuptools75.8.0indirecthigh483.0.0
urllib31.25.11indirecthigh182.7.0
urllib31.26.9indirecthigh162.7.0
vcrpy4.1.1indirecthigh18.2.1
wheel0.45.1indirecthigh20.46.2
anstream0.3.2indirectmoderate20.6.8
bleach5.0.0indirectmoderate26.4.0
paramiko2.10.4indirectmoderate43.4.0
pygments2.12.0indirectmoderate42.20.0
pygments2.13.0indirectmoderate42.20.0
pygments2.9.0indirectmoderate42.20.0
pynacl1.5.0indirectmoderate23.6.1
pytest6.2.4indirectmoderate29.0.3
requests2.27.1indirectmoderate82.33.0
rustix0.38.4indirectmoderate10.38.19
zipp3.11.0indirectmoderate23.19.1
zipp3.4.0indirectmoderate23.19.1
zipp3.8.0indirectmoderate23.19.1
remove_dir_all0.5.3indirectlow20.8.0
tempdir0.3.7indirectunknown1—
yaml-rust0.4.5indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with sillsdev/Mercurial4Chorus. Read them side by side →

94MonoGame/MonoGameOne framework for creating powerful cross-platform games.Exceptional78pal-tamas/raskThe .NET One Person Framework — build, run, and ship a whole product solo, in C#, on one server. One codebase across server, WASM & native UI; SQLite-first data, auth, jobs, mail, cache, CQRS & one-command deploy.Good71ooples/AiDotNet.TensorsThe fastest .NET tensor library. Beats MathNet (6x), NumSharp (3200x), matches TorchSharp CPU - pure managed C# with hand-tuned AVX2/FMA SIMD kernels. Optional CUDA/OpenCL GPU acceleration.Good65PlayFab/CSharpSDKSDK for C#/.net environments other than UnityGood63josephmoresena/Rxmxnx.PInvoke.ExtensionsRxmxnx.PInvoke.Extensions is a comprehensive library designed to streamline and enhance the interaction between .NET and native P/Invoke methods.Moderate62Aptivi/MagicoMagic tricks for C# librariesModerate

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.32.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.