Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 22:36 UTC

sipsorcery-org / sipsorcery

A WebRTC, SIP and VoIP library for C# and .NET. Designed for real-time communications apps.

C#Custom license★ 1,909 stars⑂ 528 forkssince Oct 2015View on GitHub ↗

sipsorcery-org/sipsorcery holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sipsorcery-orgOrganization
66 followers10 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume310 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year310
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year34
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases99 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~19.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count99
latest_release_tagv10.0.12
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases19.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.2/60Stars1,909 stars
22.7/25Forks528 forks
10.3/15Watchers71 watchers
Inputs used
forks528
stars1,909
watchers71
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.842
How it's scored
41/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance653/735 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs653
open_issues20
closed_issues829
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.976
closed_unmerged_prs82
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
13.1/25Owner reach66 followers of sipsorcery-org
18.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers66
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginsipsorcery-org
public_repos10
account_age_days2,008
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

73Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://sipsorcery-org.github.io/sipsorcery
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsvoip, sip, webrtc, rtp, stun, sdp, csharp, dotnet, ice, video-calls, communications
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://sipsorcery-org.github.io/sipsorcery
docs_sitehttps://sipsorcery-org.github.io/sipsorcery
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes25/1,372 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes873,898
source_files_sampled1,372
oversized_source_files25
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)examples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/invoices.proto, examples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/lightning.proto, examples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/router.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesexamples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/invoices.proto, examples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/lightning.proto, examples/WebRTCLightningExamples/WebRTCLightningGetStarted/Protos/router.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,909GitHub stars
100contributors
310commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
99releases
1bus factor
20open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 22:35 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 15 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 123

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptographyindirect
NuGetCommandLineParser2.9.1indirect
NuGetConcentusindirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.0indirect
NuGetDnsClientindirect
NuGetEmbedIO3.5.2indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.2.0indirect
NuGetFFmpeg.AutoGenindirect
NuGetFFmpeg.AutoGen8.1.0indirect
NuGetGoogle.Protobuf3.34.1indirect
NuGetGrpc.Net.Client2.76.0indirect
NuGetGrpc.Net.ClientFactory2.76.0indirect
NuGetGrpc.Tools2.80.0indirect
NuGetLanguageExt.Coreindirect
NuGetLanguageExt.Core4.4.9indirect
NuGetLivekit.Server.Sdk.Dotnetindirect
NuGetLivekit.Server.Sdk.Dotnet1.2.2indirect
NuGetLLamaSharp0.27.0indirect
NuGetLLamaSharp.Backend.Cpu0.27.0indirect
NuGetlog4net2.0.5indirect
NuGetlog4net2.0.8indirect
NuGetMakaretu.Dns.Multicastindirect
NuGetMakaretu.Dns.Multicast0.27.0indirect
NuGetMartinCostello.Logging.XUnit0.7.1indirect
NuGetMathNet.Filtering0.7.0indirect
NuGetMathNet.Numerics5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCodeindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CognitiveServices.Speechindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CognitiveServices.Speech1.49.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.WindowsServices10.0.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Httpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.1.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions3.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Consoleindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console10.0.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Kiota.Bundle2.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ML.OnnxRuntime1.24.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.DirectML1.24.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.5.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHubindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets1.23.0indirect
NuGetNAudioindirect
NuGetNAudio1.10.0indirect
NuGetNAudio1.8.4indirect
NuGetNAudio1.9.0indirect
NuGetNAudio2.3.0indirect
NuGetNBitcoin10.0.3indirect
NuGetNet.Codecrete.QrCodeGenerator2.1.0indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
NuGetNNostr.Client0.0.54indirect
NuGetorg.k2fsa.sherpa.onnx1.13.3indirect
NuGetPolyfillindirect
NuGetRestSharp114.0.0indirect
NuGetRestSharp.Serializers.NewtonsoftJson114.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog2.10.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCore10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Hosting10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Logging10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Logging3.0.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Settings.Configuration10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consoleindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console3.1.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.1.1indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Debug3.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.File7.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.XUnitindirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.XUnit3.0.19indirect
NuGetSharpGL.WinForms3.1.1indirect
NuGetSIPSorcery1.6.1indirect
NuGetSIPSorcery2.0.1indirect
NuGetSIPSorcery4.0.13-preindirect
NuGetSIPSorcery4.0.4-rcindirect
NuGetSIPSorcery4.0.47-preindirect
NuGetSIPSorcery.WebSocketSharpindirect
NuGetSIPSorcery.WebSocketSharp0.0.1indirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia1.1.9indirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia2.0.0indirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia4.0.14-preindirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia4.0.47-preindirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia.Encoders10.0.4indirect
NuGetSIPSorceryMedia.Windows8.0.7indirect
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.7indirect
NuGetSkiaSharpindirect
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.8indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linuxindirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.8indirect
NuGetstateless5.20.1indirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLineindirect
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager10.0.7indirect
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager4.7.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common10.0.7indirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common4.7.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Memoryindirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Securityindirect
NuGetSystem.Net.WebSockets.Clientindirect
NuGetSystem.Net.WebSockets.Client4.3.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Reactive6.1.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTupleindirect
NuGetWebSocketSharp-netstandard1.0.1indirect
NuGetWebSocketSharpFork1.0.4.0indirect
NuGetXamarin.Android.Support.Core.Utils28.0.0.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.Android.Support.CustomTabs28.0.0.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.Android.Support.Design28.0.0.3indirect
NuGetXamarin.Essentials1.5.3.2indirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.consoleindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.console2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.