Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 11:45 UTC

slawlor / ractor

Rust actor framework

RustMIT★ 2,110 stars⑂ 127 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

slawlor/ractor holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Sean LawlorPersonal account
272 followers24 public repossince Oct 2014Meta

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioxtaskpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.4321575 days agoautomationcodesignmacosreleasextaskcommand-line-utilities
crates.ioractor0.16.5109,7258136 days agoactorractorasynchronous
crates.ioractor_macros0.16.53,246636 days agoactormacrosractorasynchronous
crates.ioractor_cluster0.16.52,2517036 days agoactorclusterractorasynchronous
crates.ioractor_cluster_derive0.16.52,2747036 days agoactorractor

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
15.8/18Commit volume57 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained28 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year57
human_commit_share0.79
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases81 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 36 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count81
latest_release_tagv0.16.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases26
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.9/60Stars2,110 stars
17.5/25Forks127 forks
8.2/15Watchers31 watchers
Inputs used
forks127
stars2,110
watchers31
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
67.6/80Monthly downloads117,496 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesractor, ractor_macros, ractor_cluster, ractor_cluster_derive
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads1,302,822
monthly_downloads117,496
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth34 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled34
top_contributor_share0.805
How it's scored
39.3/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
26.3/30PR acceptance245/279 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs245
open_issues7
closed_issues102
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.936
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.5/25Owner reach272 followers of slawlor
22.2/25Track record24 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers272
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginslawlor
public_repos24
account_age_days4,336
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history81 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesractor, ractor_macros, ractor_cluster, ractor_cluster_derive
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configractor/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/ractor
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/ractor
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained28 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories17
affected_packages6
assessed_packages100
unassessed_packages49
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 100 resolved dependencies against OSV. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history71 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.899
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,014
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, ractor/Cargo.toml, ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configractor/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance21 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, ractor/Cargo.toml, ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml, ractor_cluster_derive/Cargo.toml, ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml, ractor_example_entry_proc/Cargo.toml, ractor_macros/Cargo.toml, ractor_playground/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.21
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/128 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes58,298
source_files_sampled128
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)ractor_cluster/src/protocol/auth.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/control.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/meta.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/node.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesractor_cluster/src/protocol/auth.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/control.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/meta.proto, ractor_cluster/src/protocol/node.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

2,110GitHub stars
34contributors
57commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
81releases
1bus factor
7open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ractor_playground' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ractor_example_entry_proc' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'ractor_cluster_integration_tests' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 127 ⇿
0Stars
127Forks
68Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515012792023-012024-092026-05
Major 0Minor 11Patch 57

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 11:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 56
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobon3.9ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iostrum0.28ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-std1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractor_macros0.16.5ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iopot3.0ractor/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost0.14ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost-types0.14ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractor0.16.5ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractor_cluster_derive0.16.5ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket20.6ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.11ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1ractor_cluster/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21ractor_cluster_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1ractor_cluster_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3ractor_cluster_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractorractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractor_clusterractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.10ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-rustls0.26ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile2.1ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustyrepl0.2ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-glog0.4ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.iowebpki0.22ractor_cluster_integration_tests/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1ractor_example_entry_proc/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3ractor_example_entry_proc/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3ractor_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21ractor_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1ractor_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2ractor_macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4ractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractorractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.ioractor_clusterractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1ractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1ractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-glog0.4ractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3ractor_playground/Cargo.toml
crates.ioxtaskops0.4xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1xtask/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 149

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 116 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhowdirect
crates.ioasync-stddirect
crates.ioasync-traitdirect
crates.iobondirect
crates.iobytesdirect
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.iodashmapdirect
crates.iofuturesdirect
crates.ioonce_celldirect
crates.iopotdirect
crates.ioproc-macro-cratedirect
crates.ioproc-macro2direct
crates.ioprostdirect
crates.ioprost-typesdirect
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.ioractordirect
crates.ioractor_cluster_derivedirect
crates.ioractor_macrosdirect
crates.ioranddirect
crates.iorustls-pemfiledirect
crates.iorustyrepldirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.iosha2direct
crates.iosocket2direct
crates.iostrumdirect
crates.iosyndirect
crates.iotokiodirect
crates.iotokio-rustlsdirect
crates.iotracingdirect
crates.iotracing-glogdirect
crates.iotracing-subscriberdirect
crates.iowebpkidirect
crates.ioxtaskopsdirect
crates.iobacktraceindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iofunction_nameindirect
crates.iogetrandomindirect
crates.iojs-sysindirect
crates.iopasteindirect
crates.ioprost-buildindirect
crates.ioprotoc-bin-vendoredindirect
crates.ioserial_testindirect
crates.iotokio_with_wasmindirect
crates.iotracing-testindirect
crates.iotrybuildindirect
crates.iowasm-bindgenindirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futuresindirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-testindirect
crates.ioweb-timeindirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.26.2indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.25.9indirect
npm@puppeteer/browsers2.10.0indirect
npm@tootallnate/quickjs-emscripten0.23.0indirect
npm@types/node22.14.1indirect
npm@types/yauzl2.10.3indirect
npmagent-base7.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmast-types0.13.4indirect
npmb4a1.6.7indirect
npmbare-events2.5.4indirect
npmbare-fs4.1.2indirect
npmbare-os3.6.1indirect
npmbare-path3.0.0indirect
npmbare-stream2.6.5indirect
npmbasic-ftp5.0.5indirect
npmbuffer-crc320.2.13indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchromium-bidi3.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.0indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer6.0.2indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdegenerator5.0.1indirect
npmdevtools-protocol0.0.1425554indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescodegen2.1.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmextract-zip2.0.1indirect
npmfast-fifo1.3.2indirect
npmfd-slicer1.1.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmget-uri6.0.4indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmip-address9.0.5indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjsbn1.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlru-cache7.18.3indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnan2.22.2indirect
npmnetmask2.0.2indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpac-proxy-agent7.2.0indirect
npmpac-resolver7.0.1indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprogress2.0.3indirect
npmproxy-agent6.5.0indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmpump3.0.2indirect
npmpuppeteer24.6.1indirect
npmpuppeteer-core24.6.1indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.1indirect
npmsleep6.1.0indirect
npmsmart-buffer4.2.0indirect
npmsocks2.8.4indirect
npmsocks-proxy-agent8.0.5indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.1.3indirect
npmstreamx2.22.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmtar-fs3.0.8indirect
npmtar-stream3.1.7indirect
npmtext-decoder1.2.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtyped-query-selector2.12.0indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmws8.18.1indirect
npmxvfb0.4.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyauzl2.10.0indirect
npmzod3.24.2indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 100 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
basic-ftp5.0.5indirectcritical45.3.1
extract-zip2.0.1indirecthigh2
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
tar-fs3.0.8indirecthigh23.1.1
ws8.18.1indirecthigh28.21.0
ip-address9.0.5indirectmoderate210.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.