Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 12:49 UTC

slub / slub_digitalcollections

Templates, Styles and Configuration for Kitodo.Presentation based Digital Collections by SLUB Dresden

Less · HTML · PHPGPL-3.0★ 9 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗

slub/slub_digitalcollections holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SLUBOrganization

45 followers178 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	slub/slub-digitalcollections	v7.0.0	150	26	70 days ago	extension typo3 slub-digitalcollections

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.8/36	Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 355 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	355
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	43

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 26 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 70 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~56.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	26
latest_release_tag	v7.0.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	70
mean_days_between_releases	56.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk

How it's scored

14.6/60	Stars — 9 stars
10.7/25	Forks — 20 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	20
stars	9
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

33At Risk

How it's scored

29.1/80	Monthly downloads — 150 downloads/month across packagist
4/20	Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	slub/slub-digitalcollections
dependents	3
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	4,724
monthly_downloads	150
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 60% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	18
top_contributor_share	0.598

Issue & PR responsiveness

91Excellent

How it's scored

38.2/42	Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
29.1/30	PR acceptance — 318/328 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

merged_prs	318
open_issues	1
closed_issues	10
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	4
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	8
issue_closed_ratio	0.909
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12/25	Owner reach — 45 followers of slub
25/25	Track record — 178 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	45
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	slub
public_repos	178
account_age_days	5,241

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 70 days ago
20/20	Version history — 26 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	slub/slub-digitalcollections
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	70

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5	Code-Review — Found 8/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	185
unassessed_packages	4
affected_by_severity	high 4, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

39Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.7/40	Legible commit history — 66 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.725
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.09

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Less without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/22 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Less
largest_source_bytes	49,976
source_files_sampled	22
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

9GitHub stars

18contributors

355commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

26releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'slub-digitalcollections' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿

0Stars

20Forks

24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 5Minor 5Patch 14

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10

5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 12:49 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8	Code-Review	Found 8/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10	Contributors	project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`^12.4\|^13.4`	composer.json
Packagist	kitodo/presentation	`dev-main`	composer.json

All dependencies 189

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 187 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	kitodo/presentation	`—`	direct
Packagist	typo3/cms-core	`—`	direct
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.12`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.10`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.4`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.29`	indirect
npm	abbrev	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	array-each	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-slice	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	async	`2.6.4`	indirect
npm	async	`3.2.6`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	body	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.21`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	bytes	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	cli	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	colors	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	console-browserify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	continuable-cache	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	copy-anything	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	date-now	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	dateformat	`4.6.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	detect-file	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domutils	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	errno	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	error	`7.2.1`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	eventemitter2	`0.4.14`	indirect
npm	exit	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	expand-tilde	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	faye-websocket	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	findup-sync	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	findup-sync	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	fined	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	flagged-respawn	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	for-in	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	for-own	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	gaze	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	getobject	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.7`	indirect
npm	global-modules	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	global-prefix	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	globule	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	grunt	`1.6.3`	indirect
npm	grunt-cli	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-jshint	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-less	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-contrib-watch	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-known-options	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-legacy-log	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-legacy-log-utils	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	grunt-legacy-util	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	grunt-terser	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	homedir-polyfill	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	hooker	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	htmlparser2	`3.8.3`	indirect
npm	http-parser-js	`0.5.10`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	interpret	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-absolute	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-object	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-relative	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-unc-path	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-what	`4.1.16`	indirect
npm	is-windows	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	isarray	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isobject	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	jit-grunt	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.15.2`	indirect
npm	jshint	`2.13.6`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	less	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	liftup	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	livereload-js	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	make-dir	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	make-iterator	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	map-cache	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	needle	`2.9.1`	indirect
npm	needle	`3.5.0`	indirect
npm	nopt	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	object.defaults	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	object.map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	object.pick	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	parse-filepath	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	parse-node-version	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-passwd	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-root	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-root-regex	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	probe-image-size	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	prr	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.2`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`1.1.7`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`1.1.14`	indirect
npm	rechoir	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.10`	indirect
npm	resolve-dir	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safe-json-parse	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	stream-parser	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	string-template	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`0.10.31`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.51.2`	indirect
npm	tiny-lr	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	unc-path-regex	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	underscore.string	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	v8flags	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	websocket-driver	`0.7.5`	indirect
npm	websocket-extensions	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
braces	`3.0.3`	indirect	high	1	—
lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect	high	2	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.0.8`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
probe-image-size	`7.3.0`	indirect	high	1	`7.4.0`
qs	`6.15.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`6.16.0`
sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect	moderate	1	—
sprintf-js	`1.1.3`	indirect	moderate	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records