Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 15:52 UTC

snowdreamtech / template

An enterprise-grade, foundational template designed for multi-AI IDE collaboration. This repository serves as a Single Source of Truth for AI agent rules, workflows, and project configurations, supporting over 50 different AI-assisted IDEs with massive multi-language support.

Shell · Python · PowerShellMIT★ 15 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
#ai#enterprise#template

snowdreamtech/template holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (40/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Snowdream TechOrganization
17 followers79 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,399 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,399
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv0.15.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases8.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars15
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

17Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.945

Issue & PR responsiveness

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
12.3/30PR acceptance — 65/158 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs65
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs93
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
9/25Owner reach — 17 followers of snowdreamtech
25/25Track record — 79 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginsnowdreamtech
public_repos79
account_age_days2,602
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://snowdreamtech.github.io/template/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, enterprise, template
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://snowdreamtech.github.io/template/
docs_sitehttps://snowdreamtech.github.io/template/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

75Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .aider.conf.yml, .claude/CLAUDE.md, .clinerules, .cursor/rules/rules.md, .cursor/rules/rules.mdc, .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_snowdreamtech.init.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.agent-context.update.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.analyze.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.checklist.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.clarify.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.constitution.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.commit.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.feature.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.initialize.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.remote.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.validate.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.implement.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.plan.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.specify.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.tasks.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.taskstoissues.mdc, .cursorrules, .gemini/GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/rules.instructions.md, .goose/.goosehints, .windsurfrules, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.aider.conf.yml, .claude/CLAUDE.md, .clinerules, .cursor/rules/rules.md, .cursor/rules/rules.mdc, .cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_snowdreamtech.init.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.agent-context.update.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.analyze.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.checklist.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.clarify.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.constitution.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.commit.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.feature.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.initialize.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.remote.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.git.validate.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.implement.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.plan.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.specify.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.tasks.mdc, .cursor/rules/speckit_speckit.taskstoissues.mdc, .cursorrules, .gemini/GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/rules.instructions.md, .goose/.goosehints, .windsurfrules, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,471
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs, ruff.toml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Shell without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/32 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes1,378
source_files_sampled32
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

15GitHub stars
3contributors
2,399commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 15:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 189

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 189 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@algolia/abtesting1.20.0indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.54.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.54.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.86indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.138.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.38indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.38indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.54.0indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.18indirect
npmpreact10.29.2indirect
npmproperty-information7.2.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.4indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite8.1.3indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.38indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with snowdreamtech/template. Read them side by side →

94MemoriLabs/MemoriMemori is agent-native memory infrastructure. A LLM-agnostic layer that turns agent execution and conversation into structured, persistent state for production systems. Built for enterprise, Memori works with the data infrastructure you already run, no rip-and-replace, and deploys across managed cloud, single-tenant cloud, VPC, and on-premises.Exceptional99langchain-ai/langgraphBuild resilient agents.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99WordPress/gutenbergThe Block Editor project for WordPress and beyond. Plugin is available from the official repository.Exceptional99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.