Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 01:00 UTC

spatialaudio / nbsphinx

:ledger: Sphinx source parser for Jupyter notebooks

Python · TeXMIT★ 471 stars⑂ 139 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNotebookhow this is determined
#jupyter-notebook#sphinx-doc#sphinx-extension

spatialaudio/nbsphinx holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (29/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

spatialaudio.netOrganization
162 followers61 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPInbsphinx0.9.81,658,20057230 days agosphinxjupyternotebook

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

70Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 57 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 230 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~116 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tag0.9.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release230
mean_days_between_releases116
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good
How it's scored
43.3/60Stars — 471 stars
17.8/25Forks — 139 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks139
stars471
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,658,200 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnbsphinx
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,658,200
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 51 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled51
top_contributor_share0.898

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good
How it's scored
30.3/42Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
26.5/30PR acceptance — 445/504 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs445
open_issues99
closed_issues257
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.722
closed_unmerged_prs59
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

89Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
15.9/25Owner reach — 162 followers of spatialaudio
25/25Track record — 61 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers162
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginspatialaudio
public_repos61
account_age_days4,455
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 230 days ago
20/20Version history — 57 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnbsphinx
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish230

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://nbsphinx.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjupyter-notebook, sphinx-doc, sphinx-extension
has_wikino
homepagehttps://nbsphinx.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttps://nbsphinx.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

29At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

17Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

47Weak
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
47.1/55Manageable file sizes — 1/7 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes78,270
source_files_sampled7
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

471GitHub stars
51contributors
33commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
57releases
1bus factor
99open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 00:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests25 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdocutils>=0.18.1pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2—pyproject.toml
PyPInbconvert>=5.3,!=5.4pyproject.toml
PyPInbformat—pyproject.toml
PyPIsphinx>=1.8,!=8.2.0,!=8.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPItraitlets>=5pyproject.toml
All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 164 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdocutils0.19direct
PyPIdocutils0.20.1direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPInbconvert5.6.1direct
PyPInbconvert7.16.6direct
PyPInbformat5.10.4direct
PyPIsphinx5.3.0direct
PyPIsphinx8.1.3direct
PyPIsphinx8.2.3direct
PyPItraitlets5.14.3direct
PyPIalabaster0.7.13indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbackcall0.2.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.13.5indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.6.3indirect
PyPIbleach6.1.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.2.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.16indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.0indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.60.2indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.5.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.4.5indirect
PyPIipykernel—indirect
PyPIipykernel4.2.2indirect
PyPIipykernel6.30.1indirect
PyPIipympl—indirect
PyPIipympl0.1.1indirect
PyPIipympl0.8.4indirect
PyPIipympl0.9.7indirect
PyPIipython8.12.3indirect
PyPIipython8.18.1indirect
PyPIipython8.37.0indirect
PyPIipython9.4.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets—indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.7indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.23.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2023.12.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.4.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client5.2.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.8.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab—indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.15indirect
PyPIjupytext—indirect
PyPIjupytext1.17.1indirect
PyPIjupytext1.17.2indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.7indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlatexcodec3.0.0indirect
PyPIlatexcodec3.0.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib—indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.5indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.2.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.1.7indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.4.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.5.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune0.8.4indirect
PyPImistune3.3.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.2indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInumpy—indirect
PyPInumpy1.24.4indirect
PyPInumpy2.0.2indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.2indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas—indirect
PyPIpandas2.0.3indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.2indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpickleshare0.7.5indirect
PyPIpillow12.2.0indirect
PyPIpkgutil-resolve-name1.3.10indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.8indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpsutil7.0.0indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpybtex0.25.1indirect
PyPIpybtex-docutils1.0.3indirect
PyPIpycparser2.22indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.1.4indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.0.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.35.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIrequests2.15.1indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.4indirect
PyPIroman-numerals-py3.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.20.1indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinx-codeautolink—indirect
PyPIsphinx-codeautolink0.12.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-codeautolink0.15.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-codeautolink0.17.5indirect
PyPIsphinx-last-updated-by-git—indirect
PyPIsphinx-last-updated-by-git0.3.8indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp1.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-bibtex—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-bibtex2.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-bibtex2.6.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp1.0.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp1.0.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml1.1.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter1.3.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItestpath0.6.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.4.0indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.7indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.13.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.14indirect
PyPIxarray—indirect
PyPIxarray2023.1.0indirect
PyPIxarray2024.7.0indirect
PyPIxarray2025.6.1indirect
PyPIxarray2025.8.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.20.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with spatialaudio/nbsphinx. Read them side by side →

96jupyter/notebookJupyter Interactive NotebookExceptional88mgaitan/sphinxcontrib-mermaidMermaid diagrams in yours sphinx powered docsExcellent87mljar/mercuryImpress your boss and turn a Jupyter notebook into a beautiful, shareable web app — no callbacks, no frontend, no rewrite.Excellent84executablebooks/myst-nbParse and execute ipynb files in SphinxExcellent81jupyter-lsp/jupyterlab-lspCoding assistance for JupyterLab (code navigation + hover suggestions + linters + autocompletion + rename) using Language Server ProtocolExcellent80nbQA-dev/nbQARun ruff, isort, pyupgrade, mypy, pylint, flake8, and more on Jupyter NotebooksExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.