Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 08:24 UTC

statamic / importer

Import content and data from XML or CSV with support for WP + Gutenberg.

PHPMIT★ 18 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

statamic/importer holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StatamicOrganization
406 followers74 public repossince Apr 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagiststatamic/importerv2.1.02,52932128 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume50 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year50
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases32 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 128 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~29.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release128
mean_days_between_releases29.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20/60Stars18 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars18
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.4/80Monthly downloads2,529 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesstatamic/importer
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads35,705
monthly_downloads2,529
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.874
How it's scored
37.9/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance80/85 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs80
open_issues5
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.902
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18.8/25Owner reach406 followers of statamic
25/25Track record74 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers406
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginstatamic
public_repos74
account_age_days5,197
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 128 days ago
20/20Version history32 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesstatamic/importer
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish128

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsimporter, statamic-addon
has_wikino
homepagehttps://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
docs_sitehttps://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/62 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes36,381
source_files_sampled62
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

18GitHub stars
10contributors
50commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
32releases
1bus factor
5open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 08:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagiststatamic/cms^6.5composer.json
Packagistspatie/simple-excel^3.7composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler^7.1composer.json
Packagistpixelfear/composer-dist-plugin^0.1.5composer.json
Packagistsymfony/css-selector^7.1 || ^8.0composer.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.2.4package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.2.4package.json
npmuniqid^5.4.0package.json
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.2.4direct
npmtailwindcss4.2.4direct
npmuniqid5.4.0direct
Packagistpixelfear/composer-dist-plugindirect
Packagistspatie/simple-exceldirect
Packagiststatamic/cmsdirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selectordirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawlerdirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.127.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-rc.13indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@statamic/cms0.0.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.2.4indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.6indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.33indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.21.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmjiti2.6.1indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin3.1.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.12indirect
npmrolldown1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmvite8.0.10indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
npmvue3.5.33indirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-rayindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.