Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 02:26 UTC

statamic / importer

Import content and data from XML or CSV with support for WP + Gutenberg.

PHPMIT★ 18 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

statamic/importer holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

StatamicOrganization · verified domain
412 followers77 public repossince Apr 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagiststatamic/importerv2.2.04,8033350 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume — 54 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year54
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year20
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 50 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~42.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release50
mean_days_between_releases42.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20/60Stars — 18 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars18
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.1/80Monthly downloads — 4,803 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesstatamic/importer
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads47,156
monthly_downloads4,803
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.92
How it's scored
37.9/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 83/88 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs83
open_issues5
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.902
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.8/25Owner reach — 412 followers of statamic
25/25Track record — 77 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers412
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginstatamic
public_repos77
account_age_days5,251

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 50 days ago
20/20Version history — 33 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesstatamic/importer
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish50

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsimporter, statamic-addon
has_wikino
homepagehttps://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
docs_sitehttps://statamic.com/addons/statamic/importer
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
1/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages8
affected_by_severityhigh 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 96 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://statamic.com/llms.txt)
25.5/40Legible commit history — 44 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://statamic.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.478
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/62 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes36,381
source_files_sampled62
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

18GitHub stars
9contributors
54commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
5open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712024-122025-052025-09
Major 0Minor 2Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 02:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
2SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagiststatamic/cms^6.25composer.json
Packagistspatie/simple-excel^3.7composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler^7.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/css-selector^7.1 || ^8.0composer.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.2.4package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.2.4package.json
npmuniqid^5.4.0package.json
All dependencies 104

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tailwindcss/vite4.2.4direct
npmtailwindcss4.2.4direct
npmuniqid5.4.0direct
Packagistspatie/simple-excel—direct
Packagiststatamic/cms—direct
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—direct
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler—direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.127.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-rc.13indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npm@statamic/cms0.0.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.2.4indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.2.4indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.6indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.33indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.33indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.21.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmjiti2.6.1indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin3.1.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.12indirect
npmrolldown1.0.0-rc.17indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmvite8.0.10indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
npmvue3.5.33indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-ray—indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 96 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.11indirecthigh35.1.16
postcss8.5.12indirecthigh28.5.23
vite8.0.10indirecthigh28.0.16

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.