Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 05:36 UTC

tacticians-academy / academy-library

Generates TypeScript data files for each Set of Teamfight Tactics.

TypeScriptISC★ 10 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2022View on GitHub ↗

tacticians-academy/academy-library holds a health index of 20 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (35/100) and lowest on Vitality (17/100). It was last updated 942 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

20
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

20
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 29 is calibrated to 23 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

1 follower3 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@tacticians-academy/academy-library0.33.026562953 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

17Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 942 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push942
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 62 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 953 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~72.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagv0.33.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release953
mean_days_between_releases72.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars — 10 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars10
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (ISC)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
32.3/80Monthly downloads — 265 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@tacticians-academy/academy-library
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads265
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

29At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of tacticians-academy
13.7/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logintacticians-academy
public_repos3
account_age_days1,703
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 953 days ago
20/20Version history — 62 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@tacticians-academy/academy-library
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish953

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

32At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — package.json ("eslintConfig")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscommunitydragon, cdragon, teamfight-tactics, tft
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories37
affected_packages12
assessed_packages155
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 8, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 155 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — package.json ("eslintConfig")
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
0/55Manageable file sizes — no source files detected
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes—
source_files_sampled0
oversized_source_files0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

10GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
942days since last push
62releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 05:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities26 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 155

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap1.2.6indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.10.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.14indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.15indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@ky-is/eslint-config2.5.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.9indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.4indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node20.11.25indirect
npm@types/semver7.5.8indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils7.1.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys7.1.1indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.2.0indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer4.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff4.0.2indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.0indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfetch-blob3.2.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.3.1indirect
npmformdata-polyfill4.0.10indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.1indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch9.0.3indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnode-domexception1.0.0indirect
npmnode-fetch3.3.2indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils1.3.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypescript5.4.2indirect
npmundici-types5.26.5indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmweb-streams-polyfill3.3.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 155 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.3.1indirectcritical23.4.2
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh85.0.12
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh85.0.12
braces3.0.2indirecthigh23.0.3
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
js-yaml4.1.0indirecthigh54.3.2
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
minimatch9.0.3indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
diff4.0.2indirectmoderate18.0.3
micromatch4.0.5indirectmoderate14.0.8

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.