Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 11:53 UTC

thephpleague / commonmark

Highly-extensible PHP Markdown parser which fully supports the CommonMark and GFM specs.

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 2,968 stars⑂ 214 forkssince Sep 2014View on GitHub ↗

thephpleague/commonmark holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (61/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

946 followers159 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistleague/commonmark2.10.013,532,59514410 days agoparsermarkdowngithubmdgfmcommonmarkflavoredgithub-flavored

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume114 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year114
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 10 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~51.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag2.10.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases51.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

91Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
56.3/60Stars2,968 stars
19.4/25Forks214 forks
8.4/15Watchers33 watchers
Inputs used
forks214
stars2,968
watchers33
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads13,532,595 downloads/month across packagist
19.5/20Registry dependents844 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesleague/commonmark
dependents844
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads461,007,964
monthly_downloads13,532,595
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth96 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 75 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled96
top_contributor_share0.845
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance582/654 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs582
open_issues16
closed_issues365
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d19
issue_closed_ratio0.958
closed_unmerged_prs72
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
21.4/25Owner reach946 followers of thephpleague
25/25Track record159 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers946
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginthephpleague
public_repos159
account_age_days5,726
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history144 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesleague/commonmark
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://commonmark.thephpleague.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, commonmark, markdown, github-flavored-markdown, gfm, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://commonmark.thephpleague.com
docs_sitehttps://commonmark.thephpleague.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2.5/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Gold
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 75 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages47
unassessed_packages21
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 47 resolved dependencies against OSV. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md, tests/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.2/40Legible commit history44 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.473
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, tests/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,763
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice31 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.31
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/500 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes32,783
source_files_sampled500
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,968GitHub stars
96contributors
114commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
16open issues
Packagist, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 214 ⇿
0Stars
214Forks
95Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024021452014-102020-092026-07
Major 2Minor 15Patch 68

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 11:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
10CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Gold
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 75 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistleague/config^1.1.1composer.json
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher^1.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^2.1 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80^1.16composer.json
All dependencies 68

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 64 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistleague/configdirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php80direct
Packagistcebe/markdownindirect
Packagistcommonmark/cmark0.31.1indirect
Packagistcommonmark/commonmark.js0.31.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecatedindirect
Packagistembed/embedindirect
Packagisterusev/parsedownindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistgithub/gfm0.29.0indirect
Packagistmichelf/php-markdownindirect
Packagistnyholm/psr7indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistscrutinizer/ocularindirect
Packagistsymfony/finderindirect
Packagistsymfony/processindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
Packagistunleashedtech/php-coding-standardindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemscolorator1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemscsv3.3.6indirect
RubyGemsem-websocket0.5.3indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsforwardable-extended2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgoogle-protobuf4.35.1indirect
RubyGemshttp_parser.rb0.8.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll4.4.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-github-metadata2.16.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sass-converter3.1.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-watch2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsliquid4.0.4indirect
RubyGemslisten3.10.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmercenary0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsoctokit6.1.1indirect
RubyGemspathutil0.16.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrouge4.7.0indirect
RubyGemssafe_yaml1.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass-embedded1.102.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.3indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 47 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.