Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 08:02 UTC

toniantunovi / lucidshark

Ship AI-generated code without the fear

PythonApache-2.0★ 19 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗

#ai #claude-code #code-quality #devsecops #linting #mcp #sast #sca #security-scanner #coverage #duplication-detection

toniantunovi/lucidshark holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Toni AntunovicPersonal account

9 followers14 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

78Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
14.5/36	Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 617 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	617
human_commit_share	0.76
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	21

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 99 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~18.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	99
latest_release_tag	v0.8.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	2
mean_days_between_releases	18.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

26At Risk

How it's scored

20.4/60	Stars — 19 stars
5.8/25	Forks — 6 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	6
stars	19
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.962

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22/30	PR acceptance — 97/132 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 8/8 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	97
open_issues	0
closed_issues	3
prs_merged_7d	8
prs_decided_7d	8
prs_merged_30d	10
prs_decided_30d	10
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	35
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	8
first_time_prs_decided_30d	8

Ownership & stewardship

47Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.2/25	Owner reach — 9 followers of toniantunovi
20.6/25	Track record — 14 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	9
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	toniantunovi
public_repos	14
account_age_days	4,450

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://lucidshark.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 11 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ai, claude-code, code-quality, devsecops, linting, mcp, sast, sca, security-scanner, coverage, duplication-detection
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://lucidshark.com
docs_site	https://lucidshark.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 49 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	72
affected_packages	19
assessed_packages	281
unassessed_packages	8
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 12, moderate 5, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 281 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 74 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.974
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — tests/integration/projects/java-webapp/pom.xml, tests/integration/projects/rust-cli/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11	Static type checking — src/lucidshark/py.typed, tests/integration/projects/typescript-api/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	src/lucidshark/py.typed, tests/integration/projects/typescript-api/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.11
toolchain_manifests	tests/integration/projects/java-webapp/pom.xml, tests/integration/projects/rust-cli/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/lucidshark/py.typed, tests/integration/projects/typescript-api/tsconfig.json)
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 3/389 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	101,609
source_files_sampled	389
oversized_source_files	3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example

Inputs used

example_dirs	example
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars

3contributors

617commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

99releases

1bus factor

0open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'lucidshark' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿

0Stars

6Forks

65Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 2Patch 63

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 08:02 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	49 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 289

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 289 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin	`3.11.0`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin	`3.2.2`	indirect
Maven	org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin	`0.8.11`	indirect
Maven	org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter	`5.10.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`8.57.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/config-array	`0.13.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/object-schema	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@types/body-parser	`1.19.6`	indirect
npm	@types/connect	`3.4.38`	indirect
npm	@types/express	`4.17.25`	indirect
npm	@types/express-serve-static-core	`4.19.8`	indirect
npm	@types/http-errors	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/lodash	`4.17.23`	indirect
npm	@types/mime	`1.3.5`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/qs	`6.14.0`	indirect
npm	@types/range-parser	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@types/semver	`7.7.1`	indirect
npm	@types/send	`0.17.6`	indirect
npm	@types/send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/serve-static	`1.15.10`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/parser	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/scope-manager	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/type-utils	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/utils	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-flatten	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	array-union	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`1.19.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.3`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	depd	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	destroy	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`8.57.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`7.2.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	espree	`9.6.1`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	express	`4.17.1`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`13.24.0`	indirect
npm	globby	`11.1.0`	indirect
npm	graphemer	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`1.7.2`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.19`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.7.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.3`	indirect
npm	send	`0.17.1`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	slash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	statuses	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ts-api-utils	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	type-is	`1.6.18`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.16.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	utils-merge	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anthropic	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`—`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.33`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-anthropic	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-core	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-ollama	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-openai	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	langsmith	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mcp	`1.29.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	ollama	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	openai	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	posthog	`—`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller	`6.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`1.1.411`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	questionary	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.9.3`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.25.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.22`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.10`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	tiktoken	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.70.0`	indirect
PyPI	types-defusedxml	`0.7.0.20260504`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260815`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`1.26.4`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uuid-utils	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.52.4`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 281 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
body-parser	`1.19.0`	indirect	high	2	`2.3.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
flask	`2.0.0`	indirect	high	4	`3.1.3`
js-yaml	`4.1.1`	indirect	high	4	`4.3.2`
lodash	`4.17.19`	indirect	high	5	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`9.0.3`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
path-to-regexp	`0.1.7`	indirect	high	3	`8.0.0`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
qs	`6.7.0`	indirect	high	4	`6.16.0`
urllib3	`1.26.4`	indirect	high	18	`2.7.0`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
express	`4.17.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`5.0.0-beta.3`
requests	`2.25.0`	indirect	moderate	8	`2.33.0`
send	`0.17.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.19.0`
serve-static	`1.14.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.1.0`
cookie	`0.4.0`	indirect	low	1	`0.7.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records