Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-02 00:43 UTC

toptensoftware / RichTextKit

Rich text rendering for SkiaSharp

C#Custom license★ 429 stars⑂ 88 forkssince Jul 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined

toptensoftware/RichTextKit holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (26/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Brad RobinsonPersonal account
141 followers139 public repossince Jan 2010Topten Software

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetTopten.RichTextKit0.5.168-390 days agorichtextskiaskiasharpfont

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

26At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42.7/60Stars — 429 stars
16.2/25Forks — 88 forks
7.6/15Watchers — 24 watchers
Inputs used
forks88
stars429
watchers24
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
67.9/80Total downloads — 3,448,431 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesTopten.RichTextKit
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads3,448,431
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.259
How it's scored
26.4/42Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance — 20/25 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues29
closed_issues49
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.628
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.5/25Owner reach — 141 followers of toptensoftware
25/25Track record — 139 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers141
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logintoptensoftware
public_repos139
account_age_days6,107
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 39 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesTopten.RichTextKit
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
3/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
17.9/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: request 2.88.0 (moderate 6.1)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
34.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,295 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories10
affected_packages7
assessed_packages60
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 3, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 60 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.9/40Legible commit history — 11 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.111
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — RichStringSandbox/RichStringSandbox.csproj, Sandbox/Sandbox.csproj, SandboxDriver/SandboxDriver.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsRichStringSandbox/RichStringSandbox.csproj, Sandbox/Sandbox.csproj, SandboxDriver/SandboxDriver.csproj, TestBench/TestBench.csproj, Topten.RichTextKit.Test/Topten.RichTextKit.Test.csproj, Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 1/101 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes76,523
source_files_sampled101
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

429GitHub stars
13contributors
1commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
3bus factor
29open issues
npm, NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 88 ⇿
0Stars
88Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008122019-082023-022026-09

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-02 00:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmrequest^2.88.0BuildUnicodeData/package.json
npmunicode-trie^1.0.0BuildUnicodeData/package.json
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7RichStringSandbox/RichStringSandbox.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7Sandbox/Sandbox.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7SandboxDriver/SandboxDriver.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.6.1Topten.RichTextKit.Test/Topten.RichTextKit.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit2.4.1Topten.RichTextKit.Test/Topten.RichTextKit.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.2Topten.RichTextKit.Test/Topten.RichTextKit.Test.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7Topten.RichTextKit.Test/Topten.RichTextKit.Test.csproj
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.8.2.3Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.0.0Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.HarfBuzz2.88.7Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.7Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0Topten.RichTextKit/Topten.RichTextKit.csproj
All dependencies 60

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmrequest2.88.0direct
npmunicode-trie1.0.0direct
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.8.2.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.6.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.0.0direct
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.HarfBuzz2.88.7direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.7direct
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0direct
NuGetxunit2.4.1direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.2direct
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmasn10.2.4indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaws-sign20.7.0indirect
npmaws41.8.0indirect
npmbcrypt-pbkdf1.0.2indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.2indirect
npmdashdash1.14.1indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmecc-jsbn0.1.2indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextsprintf1.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.0.0indirect
npmforever-agent0.6.1indirect
npmform-data2.3.3indirect
npmgetpass0.1.7indirect
npmhar-schema2.0.0indirect
npmhar-validator5.1.3indirect
npmhttp-signature1.2.0indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmisstream0.1.2indirect
npmjsbn0.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema0.2.3indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmjsprim1.4.1indirect
npmmime-db1.40.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.24indirect
npmoauth-sign0.9.0indirect
npmpako0.2.9indirect
npmperformance-now2.1.0indirect
npmpsl1.2.0indirect
npmpunycode1.4.1indirect
npmpunycode2.1.1indirect
npmqs6.5.2indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsshpk1.16.1indirect
npmtiny-inflate1.0.2indirect
npmtough-cookie2.4.3indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmtweetnacl0.14.5indirect
npmuri-js4.2.2indirect
npmuuid3.3.2indirect
npmverror1.10.0indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 60 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
json-schema0.2.3indirectcritical10.4.0
form-data2.3.3indirecthigh24.0.6
qs6.5.2indirecthigh36.16.0
uuid3.3.2indirecthigh113.0.1
request2.88.0directmoderate13.0.0
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
tough-cookie2.4.3indirectmoderate14.1.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.