Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 18:49 UTC

turnstonelabs / turnstone

PythonApache-2.0★ 1,250 stars⑂ 96 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

turnstonelabs/turnstone holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

turnstonelabsOrganization

32 followers9 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	turnstone	1.8.2	4,420	135	0 days ago	agent ai chat llm openai tools

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18.7/36	Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,866 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,866
human_commit_share	0.83
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	27

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v1.8.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	6.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

72Good

How it's scored

50.2/60	Stars — 1,250 stars
16.5/25	Forks — 96 forks
5.8/15	Watchers — 12 watchers

Inputs used

forks	96
stars	1,250
watchers	12
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate

How it's scored

48.6/80	Monthly downloads — 4,420 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	turnstone
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	4,420
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	15
top_contributor_share	0.975

Issue & PR responsiveness

55Moderate

How it's scored

21.8/42	Issue resolution — 52% of issues closed
29/30	PR acceptance — 848/877 decided PRs merged
2.6/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	848
open_issues	106
closed_issues	115
prs_merged_7d	12
prs_decided_7d	15
prs_merged_30d	37
prs_decided_30d	43
issue_closed_ratio	0.52
closed_unmerged_prs	29
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	5

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
10.9/25	Owner reach — 32 followers of turnstonelabs
8.3/25	Track record — 9 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	32
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	turnstonelabs
public_repos	9
account_age_days	187

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 135 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	turnstone
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 17 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
2/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	179
unassessed_packages	6
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 179 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 79 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.952
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, turnstone/sdk/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, turnstone/sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.14

Code legibility for models

76Good

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, turnstone/sdk/py.typed)
48.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 86/750 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	3,572,661
source_files_sampled	750
oversized_source_files	86

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

1,250GitHub stars

15contributors

1,866commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

106open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:turnstone@1.8.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 96 ⇿

0Stars

96Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 8Patch 46

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10

5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 18:48 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8	CI-Tests	17 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0	Dangerous-Workflow	dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
5	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
4	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 25

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	openai	`>=3,<4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	anthropic	`>=0.117,<1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.28`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx2	`>=2.7,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mcp	`>=1.27,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	starlette	`>=1.3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.34`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sse-starlette	`>=2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx-sse	`>=0.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`>=2.14.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`>=2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	alembic	`>=1.14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psycopg	`>=3.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	croniter	`>=3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	structlog	`>=24.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyJWT	`>=2.8`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	bcrypt	`>=4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`>=48.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	lacme	`>=1.2,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-frontmatter	`>=1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pypdfium2	`>=4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pillow	`>=10`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	altair	`>=6.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	vl-convert-python	`>=1.6`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	alembic	`1.19.1`	direct
PyPI	altair	`6.2.2`	direct
PyPI	anthropic	`0.125.0`	direct
PyPI	bcrypt	`5.0.0`	direct
PyPI	croniter	`6.2.4`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	direct
PyPI	httpx2	`2.12.0`	direct
PyPI	lacme	`1.2.0`	direct
PyPI	mcp	`—`	direct
PyPI	mcp	`1.29.1`	direct
PyPI	openai	`3.7.0`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	direct
PyPI	psycopg	`3.3.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	direct
PyPI	pypdfium2	`5.13.0`	direct
PyPI	python-frontmatter	`1.3.0`	direct
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.52`	direct
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.8`	direct
PyPI	starlette	`1.6.0`	direct
PyPI	structlog	`26.1.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.52.4`	direct
PyPI	vl-convert-python	`1.9.0.post1`	direct
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.148.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@standard-schema/spec	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/chai	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/deep-eql	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@vitest/expect	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/mocker	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/pretty-format	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/runner	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/snapshot	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/spy	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	@vitest/utils	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	chai	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	expect-type	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	siginfo	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	stackback	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	std-env	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	tinybench	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tinyrainbow	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.2`	indirect
npm	vitest	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	why-is-node-running	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	audioop-lts	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	discord-py	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	hatchling	`—`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	mako	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	narwhals	`2.25.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-binary	`3.3.5`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`—`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.5`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	slack-bolt	`1.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	slack-sdk	`3.44.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	turnstone	`—`	indirect
PyPI	turnstone	`1.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.24.5`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 179 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records