Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:41 UTC

vivet / GoogleApi

C# .NET Core Google Api (Maps, Places, Roads, Search, Translate). Supports all endpoints and requests / responses.

C#MIT★ 587 stars⑂ 159 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗
#maps#places#search#coordinate#location#timezone#translate#distancematrix#directions#geocoding#road#geolocation#autocomplete#c-sharp#googleapis#roads#route

vivet/GoogleApi holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (62/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (24/100). It was last updated 96 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Michael VivetPersonal account
67 followers5 public repossince Jul 2011@Nano-Core @Vivet-Software

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

43Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

22At Risk
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 96 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
9/18Commit volume — 9 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year9
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push96
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

74Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 96 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~72 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv5.8.14
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release96
mean_days_between_releases72

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

72Good
How it's scored
44.9/60Stars — 587 stars
18.3/25Forks — 159 forks
8.3/15Watchers — 32 watchers
Inputs used
forks159
stars587
watchers32
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.949

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent
How it's scored
41.8/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 137/151 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs137
open_issues1
closed_issues272
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.996
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.2/25Owner reach — 67 followers of vivet
17.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers67
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginvivet
public_repos5
account_age_days5,484
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

36Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 17 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmaps, places, search, coordinate, location, timezone, translate, distancematrix, directions, geocoding, road, geolocation, autocomplete, c-sharp, googleapis, roads, route
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.4

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

13Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/626 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes41,421
source_files_sampled626
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

587GitHub stars
27contributors
9commits, last 12 months
96days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
1open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6CI-Tests6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.1GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.1GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http10.0.1GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions8.0.2GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http8.0.1GoogleApi/GoogleApi.csproj
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions8.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http10.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http8.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json10.0.1direct
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Git8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractions8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Binder8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.UserSecrets10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Abstractions10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Abstractions8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions8.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options8.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives10.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net4621.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net481.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net4811.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.Common8.0.0indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.0.2indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.0.2indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource10.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Pipelines10.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectors4.6.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.1.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web10.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.6.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with vivet/GoogleApi. Read them side by side →

84maximn/google-mapsGoogle Maps Web Services API wrapper for .NETExcellent94TanStack/router🤖 A client-first, server-capable, fully type-safe router and full-stack framework for the web (React and more).Exceptional89jannikmi/timezonefinderpython package for finding the timezone of any point on earth (coordinates) offlineExcellent86dereuromark/cakephp-geoA CakePHP plugin around geocoding tools and helpers.Excellent96elastic/elasticsearch-netThis strongly-typed, client library enables working with Elasticsearch. It is the official client maintained and supported by Elastic.Exceptional98algolia/instantsearch⚡️ Libraries for building performant and instant search and and discovery experiences with Algolia. Compatible with JavaScript, TypeScript, React and Vue.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.