Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 15:50 UTC

1mancompany / OneManCompany

Build Your Agent Company with OMC

Python · JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 419 stars⑂ 83 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#one-person-company#openclaw#self-evolving#agent-team#one-man-company#claude-code#multiagent

1mancompany/OneManCompany holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (77/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated 18 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AI Native WolrdOrganization
16 followers31 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@1mancompany/onemancompany0.7.733,830418127 days agoaiagentmulti-agentlangchaincompanyone-man-companyai-nativeautonomous-agent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 18 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 991 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year991
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push18
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 25 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 127 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.7.73
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release127
mean_days_between_releases3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate
How it's scored
42.5/60Stars — 419 stars
16/25Forks — 83 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks83
stars419
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
47.8/80Monthly downloads — 3,830 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@1mancompany/onemancompany
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,830
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.545

Issue & PR responsiveness

53Moderate
How it's scored
23.2/42Issue resolution — 55% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 374/397 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs374
open_issues13
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.552
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.8/25Owner reach — 16 followers of 1mancompany
12.2/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers16
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_login1mancompany
public_repos31
account_age_days229

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 127 days ago
20/20Version history — 418 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@1mancompany/onemancompany
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish127

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://1mancompany.github.io/OneManCompany/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsone-person-company, openclaw, self-evolving, agent-team, one-man-company, claude-code, multiagent
has_wikino
homepagehttps://1mancompany.github.io/OneManCompany/
docs_sitehttps://1mancompany.github.io/OneManCompany/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 73 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,470

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 62 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.62
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.3/55Manageable file sizes — 19/388 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes677,463
source_files_sampled388
oversized_source_files19

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

419GitHub stars
8contributors
991commits, last 12 months
18days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
13open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'onemancompany' from its registry
  • OSV advisory lookup failed: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 83 ⇿
0Stars
83Forks
24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063757472026-032026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 24
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 15:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained25 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities73 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIfastapi>=0.115pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.34pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=13pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-core>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlanggraph>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-openai>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-anthropic>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-mcp-adapters>=0.1pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchdog>=4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIInquirerPy>=0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIdatasets>=4.8.3pyproject.toml
PyPIddgs>=8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIagent-client-protocol==0.9.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 101

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIfastapi0.133.1direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIlangchain1.2.10direct
PyPIlangchain-anthropic1.3.4direct
PyPIlangchain-core1.2.16direct
PyPIlangchain-mcp-adapters0.2.1direct
PyPIlangchain-openai1.1.10direct
PyPIlanggraph1.0.9direct
PyPIloguru0.7.3direct
PyPImcp1.26.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.13.1direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrich14.3.3direct
PyPIuvicorn0.41.0direct
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0direct
PyPIwebsockets16.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.84.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick-option-group0.5.9indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.5indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdotty-dict1.3.1indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.46indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttptools0.7.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.13.0indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint4.0.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-prebuilt1.0.8indirect
PyPIlanggraph-sdk0.3.9indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.7.7indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIonemancompany0.2.383indirect
PyPIopenai2.24.0indirect
PyPIopensandbox0.1.5indirect
PyPIopensandbox-code-interpreter0.1.1indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.7indirect
PyPIormsgpack1.12.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab6.5.0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.22indirect
PyPIpython-semantic-release10.5.3indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.2.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.2.0indirect
PyPIstarlette0.52.1indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItiktoken0.12.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.13.3indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.14.1indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIxxhash3.6.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: OSV advisory lookup failed: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with 1mancompany/OneManCompany. Read them side by side →

94MemoriLabs/MemoriMemori is agent-native memory infrastructure. A LLM-agnostic layer that turns agent execution and conversation into structured, persistent state for production systems. Built for enterprise, Memori works with the data infrastructure you already run, no rip-and-replace, and deploys across managed cloud, single-tenant cloud, VPC, and on-premises.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional95NVIDIA/NeMo-RelayMulti-language agent runtime and library for execution scope management, lifecycle events, and middleware on tool and LLM calls.Exceptional95MemTensor/MemOSSelf-evolving memory OS for LLM & AI Agents: ultra-persistent memory, hybrid-retrieval, and cross-task skill reuse, with 35.24% token savings and DeepSeek Harness support.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.