Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 20:56 UTC

Gitlawb / zero

The coding agent that answers to you, your model, your machine, your rules.

GoMIT★ 1,669 stars⑂ 184 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

Gitlawb/zero holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Security (66/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GitlawbOrganization
1,038 followers18 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/Gitlawb/zerov0.8.0-822 days ago
npm@gitlawb/zero0.8.02,0313422 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 689 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year689
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases7.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52.3/60Stars — 1,669 stars
18.9/25Forks — 184 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks184
stars1,669
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonwindow_too_short

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
44.1/80Monthly downloads — 2,031 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Gitlawb/zero, @gitlawb/zero
dependents—
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,031
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 33 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled33
top_contributor_share0.309
How it's scored
33.3/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance — 654/757 decided PRs merged
5.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 9/22 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs654
open_issues48
closed_issues183
prs_merged_7d31
prs_decided_7d36
prs_merged_30d35
prs_decided_30d59
issue_closed_ratio0.792
closed_unmerged_prs103
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d9
first_time_prs_decided_30d22
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.7/25Owner reach — 1,038 followers of Gitlawb
10.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,038
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginGitlawb
public_repos18
account_age_days180

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/Gitlawb/zero, @gitlawb/zero
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://zero.gitlawb.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agent, ai, anthropic, cli, code-assistant, coding-agent, developer-tools, gemini, llm, mcp, ollama, openai, terminal
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://zero.gitlawb.com
docs_sitehttps://zero.gitlawb.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
2/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages5
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@gitlawb/zero@0.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 5 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,896
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 23 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.23
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, internal/agenteval/testdata/fixtures/zero-mini/go.mod, internal/perfbench/testdata/edit/go.mod, internal/perfbench/testdata/fix/go.mod, internal/perfbench/testdata/nav/go.mod, internal/perfbench/testdata/refactor/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes — 25/1,444 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes242,931
source_files_sampled1,444
oversized_source_files25

Key facts

1,669GitHub stars
33contributors
689commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
8releases
2bus factor
48open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-22: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 1669 stars today.
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 17 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 1,104 ★ / 184 ⇿
1,104Stars
184Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-22. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

02004006008001,0001,2001,1041834872026-072026-082026-09
Major 0Minor 8Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 20:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
4SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 4
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.1.1go.mod
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9go.mod
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/Microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-udiffv0.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/ultravioletv0.0.0-20260703014108-f5a850f9c2b7go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/ledongthuc/pdfv0.0.0-20250511090121-5959a4027728go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.45.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gomvdan.cc/sh/v3v3.13.1go.mod
npmagent-browser^0.30.1package.json
npmtuistory^0.10.0package.json
All dependencies 107

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 88 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.1.1direct
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9direct
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2v2.27.0direct
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-udiffv0.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/ultravioletv0.0.0-20260703014108-f5a850f9c2b7direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.7direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2direct
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.15direct
Gogithub.com/ledongthuc/pdfv0.0.0-20250511090121-5959a4027728direct
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2direct
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.45.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gomvdan.cc/sh/v3v3.13.1direct
npmagent-browser0.30.1direct
npmtuistory0.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/goldenv0.0.0-20260615092313-b57e5e6d29bbindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termiosv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/windowsv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-quicktest/qtv1.102.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260611194520-c48552f49976indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
npm@clack/core1.4.2indirect
npm@clack/prompts1.6.0indirect
npm@hono/node-server1.19.14indirect
npm@hono/node-ws1.3.1indirect
npm@opentui/core0.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-darwin-arm640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-darwin-x640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-linux-arm640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-linux-x640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-win32-arm640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/core-win32-x640.2.16indirect
npm@opentui/react0.2.16indirect
npm@resvg/resvg-wasm2.6.2indirect
npm@sec-ant/readable-stream0.4.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/merge-streams4.0.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmbun-ffi-structs0.2.2indirect
npmclone1.0.4indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdefaults1.0.4indirect
npmdiff9.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmerrore0.11.0indirect
npmexeca9.6.1indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmfigures6.1.0indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmget-stream9.0.1indirect
npmget-them-args1.3.2indirect
npmghostty-opentui1.5.0indirect
npmgoke6.12.3indirect
npmhono4.12.27indirect
npmhuman-signals8.0.1indirect
npmis-plain-obj4.1.0indirect
npmis-stream4.0.1indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmkill-port-process4.0.2indirect
npmmarked17.0.1indirect
npmnpm-run-path6.0.0indirect
npmparse-ms4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-key4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpid-port2.0.1indirect
npmpretty-ms9.3.0indirect
npmreact19.2.7indirect
npmreact-devtools-core7.0.1indirect
npmreact-reconciler0.33.0indirect
npmscheduler0.27.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmshell-quote1.9.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsisteransi1.0.5indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstring-dedent3.0.2indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmstrip-final-newline4.0.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.3.0indirect
npmwcwidth1.0.1indirect
npmweb-tree-sitter0.25.10indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmws7.5.11indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyoctocolors2.1.2indirect
npmyoga-layout3.2.1indirect
npmzigpty0.2.1indirect
npmzod4.3.6indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@gitlawb/zero@0.8.0 pulls in 5 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, npm.