Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 09:15 UTC

GoogleCloudPlatform / bank-of-anthos

Retail banking sample application showcasing Kubernetes and Google Cloud

Java · Python · HCLApache-2.0★ 1,438 stars⑂ 844 forkssince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗
#samples#kubernetes#reference-architecture#sample-app#fsi#google-cloud#gcp

GoogleCloudPlatform/bank-of-anthos holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (70/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Google Cloud PlatformOrganization
21,209 followers1,496 public repossince Nov 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

85Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
17.1/18Commit volume — 79 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year79
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year32

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 29 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~121.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tagv0.6.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases121.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

85Excellent
How it's scored
51.2/60Stars — 1,438 stars
24.4/25Forks — 844 forks
9.4/15Watchers — 51 watchers
Inputs used
forks844
stars1,438
watchers51
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 51 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled51
top_contributor_share0.543

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
39.3/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
23.9/30PR acceptance — 1,749/2,192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 16/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs1,749
open_issues19
closed_issues277
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.936
closed_unmerged_prs443
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach — 21,209 followers of GoogleCloudPlatform
25/25Track record — 1,496 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers21,209
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginGoogleCloudPlatform
public_repos1,496
account_age_days4,991
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cymbal-bank.fsi.cymbal.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssamples, kubernetes, reference-architecture, sample-app, fsi, google-cloud, gcp
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://cymbal-bank.fsi.cymbal.dev
docs_sitehttps://cymbal-bank.fsi.cymbal.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

74Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 16/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
2.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

98Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/66 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes34,773
source_files_sampled66
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,438GitHub stars
51contributors
79commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
29releases
1bus factor
19open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.google.cloud.anthos.samples:bank-of-anthos' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 09:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 16/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained19 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 130

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 130 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.auth0:java-jwt4.5.2indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.22.0indirect
Mavencom.google.cloud.tools:jib-maven-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavencom.google.cloud:libraries-bom26.84.0indirect
Mavencom.google.cloud:spring-cloud-gcp-dependencies5.13.11indirect
Mavencom.google.cloud:spring-cloud-gcp-starter—indirect
Mavencom.google.cloud:spring-cloud-gcp-starter-trace—indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava32.1.3-jreindirect
Mavenio.lettuce:lettuce-core6.8.2indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-bom1.17.0indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-core—indirect
Mavenio.micrometer:micrometer-registry-stackdriver—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.26.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.26.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.15indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine—indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core5.23.0indirect
Mavenorg.postgresql:postgresql—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-actuator—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-log4j2—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web—indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-dependencies2022.0.5indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-dependencies2025.1.2indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIbidict0.23.1indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIchardet7.4.3indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconfigargparse1.7.5indirect
PyPIcontacts0.1.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.2indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIflask3.1.3indirect
PyPIflask-cors6.0.5indirect
PyPIflask-login0.6.3indirect
PyPIfrontend0.1.0indirect
PyPIgevent25.9.1indirect
PyPIgeventhttpclient2.3.9indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.31.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.55.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.6.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-trace1.19.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.2indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.81.1indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.81.1indirect
PyPIgunicorn26.0.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIloadgenerator0.1.0indirect
PyPIlocust2.44.4indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.42.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-gcp-trace1.12.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-flask0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-jinja20.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-requests0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemy0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-wsgi0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-propagator-gcp1.12.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-resourcedetector-gcp1.12.0a0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.42.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.63b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.63b1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.28.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.12indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.3indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.6indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-engineio4.13.3indirect
PyPIpython-socketio5.16.3indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIsimple-websocket1.1.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy1.4.54indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuserservice0.1.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzope-event6.2indirect
PyPIzope-interface8.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with GoogleCloudPlatform/bank-of-anthos. Read them side by side →

95googleapis/google-cloud-javaGoogle Cloud Client Library for JavaExceptional98Netflix/metaflowBuild, Manage and Deploy AI/ML SystemsExceptional98cloud-custodian/cloud-custodianRules engine for cloud security, cost optimization, and governance, DSL in yaml for policies to query, filter, and take actions on resourcesExceptional98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional98bridgecrewio/checkovPrevent cloud misconfigurations and find vulnerabilities during build-time in infrastructure as code, container images and open source packages with Checkov by Bridgecrew.Exceptional97GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-sql-proxyA utility for connecting securely to your Cloud SQL instancesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.