Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-04 06:00 UTC

Ikalus1988 / MisakaNet

📚 A zero-dependency, git-backed micro-lesson library for AI Agents to asynchronously share and search verified debugging experience. | https://misakanet.org

Python · JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 521 stars⑂ 215 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ikalus1988Personal account
225 followers45 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmmisakanet2.41.12,869160 days agomisakanetdshdsh-plugindsh-pluginsdeepseek-harnessdeepseek-harness-plugincordisfailure-memorymcpskilllessons
PyPImisakanet2.41.12,452280 days agoai-agentknowledge-basebm25ragdistributed

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence — 20/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 4,713 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,713
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 59 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count59
latest_release_tagv2.41.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.1/60Stars — 521 stars
19.4/25Forks — 215 forks
7.9/15Watchers — 27 watchers
Inputs used
forks215
stars521
watchers27
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
49.7/80Monthly downloads — 5,321 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmisakanet, misakanet
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,321
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 84 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled84
top_contributor_share0.464
How it's scored
35.7/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
20.1/30PR acceptance — 1,176/1,757 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/12 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,176
open_issues145
closed_issues823
prs_merged_7d43
prs_decided_7d60
prs_merged_30d43
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.85
closed_unmerged_prs581
first_time_authors_30d7
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d12
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.9/25Owner reach — 225 followers of Ikalus1988
18.7/25Track record — 45 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers225
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginIkalus1988
public_repos45
account_age_days1,204
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 28 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmisakanet, misakanet
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 83 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://misakanet.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfailure-memory, mcp, agents, ai-agents, cloudflare-workers, d1, documentation, knowledge-base, llm, sqlite, mcp-server, action, dsh, dsh-plugin, dsh-plugins, cordis-plugin, deepseek-harness, deepseek-harness-plugin, dsh-external
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://misakanet.org
docs_sitehttps://misakanet.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages208
unassessed_packages11
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 208 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/misakanet-failure-memory.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/domains/claude.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/misakanet-failure-memory.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/domains/claude.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,011
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — vscode-extension/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 14 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsvscode-extension/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.14
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (vscode-extension/tsconfig.json)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 5/649 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes446,889
source_files_sampled649
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

521GitHub stars
84contributors
4,713commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
59releases
2bus factor
145open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'misakanet-lessons' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index npm:misakanet@2.41.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 215 ⇿
0Stars
215Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04080120160200240215132026-052026-072026-10
Major 1Minor 36Patch 12
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-04 05:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPImisakanet-core>=2.7.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 219

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 217 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPImisakanet-core—direct
PyPImisakanet-core2.7.0direct
npm@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler0.5.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/unenv-preset2.16.2indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260926.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260926.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260926.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260926.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260926.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.3indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-freebsd-wasm320.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.3.3indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-webcontainers-wasm320.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.35.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.35.4indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@poppinss/colors4.1.6indirect
npm@poppinss/dumper0.6.5indirect
npm@poppinss/exception1.2.3indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is7.2.0indirect
npm@speed-highlight/core1.2.24indirect
npm@types/vscode^1.80.0indirect
npmblake3-wasm2.1.5indirect
npmcookie1.1.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmerror-stack-parser-es1.0.5indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmminiflare5.20260926.1-alphaindirect
npmpath-to-regexp6.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.35.4indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript^5.0.0indirect
npmundici7.29.1indirect
npmunenv2.0.0-rc.24indirect
npmworkerd1.20260926.1indirect
npmwrangler4.144.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyouch4.1.0-beta.10indirect
npmyouch-core0.3.3indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIapify-fingerprint-datapoints0.15.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbrowserforge1.2.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcssselect1.5.0indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.3.1indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.6.1indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit13.0.3.0indirect
PyPIcurl-cffi0.16.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.7.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.28.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.165.10indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonschema—indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImcp—indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImisakanet2.39.0indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-committers-plugin-2—indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInarwhals2.25.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.2indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas13.1.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti13.0.85indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime13.0.96indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu139.20.0.48indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft12.0.0.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile1.15.1.6indirect
PyPInvidia-curand10.4.0.35indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver12.0.4.66indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse12.6.3.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu130.8.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.29.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink13.3.33indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu133.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx13.0.85indirect
PyPIorjson3.12.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpatchright1.62.1indirect
PyPIplaywright1.62.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotego0.6.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.7.2indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.9.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.1indirect
PyPIscrapling0.4.14indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers6.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItld0.13.2indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItorch2.13.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItransformers5.15.1indirect
PyPItriton3.7.1indirect
PyPItyper0.27.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIw3lib2.4.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 208 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.